FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Ursa

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

With a focus on Spinal Cord Injury law, Carlson Bier offers unparalleled legal expertise. Our attorney group is committed to pursuing justice for those affected by serious spinal cord injuries in Ursa. We leverage our extensive knowledge and years of experience navigating the intricacies of Illinois legislation to advocate effectively on your behalf. Dealing with the aftermath of a spinal cord injury can be an uphill journey; physical hurdles, medical expenses, loss of work – all call for financial recompense through legitimate channels in Ursa’s demanding court system. This is where Carlson Bier asserts its prowess: every case we undertake reflects the level of meticulous care and dedication synonymous with our firm’s high standards in personal injury law. Our commitment is unwavering; towards securing compensation commensurate with your sufferings, and ensuring that favorable outcomes aren’t limited just to settlements but extend beyond – right up till complete recovery and rehabilitation are achieved! Trust Carlson Bier when it comes to your path toward justice after a Spinal Cord Injury.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Ursa Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we have not only specialized in personal injury law but have also developed significant experience and expertise in handling cases of Spinal Cord Injuries. Your spinal cord is one of the most crucial components of your entire body, serving as a conduit for transmitting signals between your brain and the rest of your body. An injury to this indispensable part can lead to severe consequences such as paralysis, loss of sensation and mobility issues.

Spinal cord injuries typically result from either a sudden traumatic blow or damage due to disease. There are two main types: complete injury resulting in total loss of sensory and motor function below the level; incomplete injury where there is some remaining function. Subsequent complications can include difficulty breathing, chronic pain, bladder or bowel control problems – nearly every aspect of life gets afflicted by these injuries.

Along with physical hardships, victims may also face immense financial strain caused by medical expenses diagnosis to rehabilitation to ongoing care necessary to manage these critical conditions. This is further compounded by their inability to work or perform regular activities post-injury which significantly affects livelihoods.

• Carlson Bier’s team comprehends deeply how difficult it can be for spinal cord injury victims.

• With decades-long experience advocating strongly for our clients’ rights we understand the medical intricacies involved.

• We fight diligently ensuring that you get fair compensation covering current & future medical costs psychological anguish and lost wages.

While filing a spinal cord injury claim may seem daunting Carlson Bier makes it easier by guiding you through each step from investigation gathering evidence negotiations with insurers or parties at fault up until representing you robustly in court if needed.

Our expert attorneys use comprehensive knowledge, seasoned negotiation skills along with aggressive courtroom strategies when required ensuring best possible outcomes for your case. We aim at taking off legal burdens so you focus on healing physically emotionally getting back into routine life while we tackle all legal aspects relentlessly striving towards bringing justice to life-altering incidents caused due negligence or intentional misconduct.

As your committed legal stewards, we meticulously investigate every case to pinpoint the exact cause of injury and detect any negligence or wrongdoing. Our professional attorneys assemble compelling cases with in-depth evidence collection reviewing medical records working closely with experts such as trauma doctors neurologists life care planners economists therapists, etc. then diligently pursue rightful compensation you deserve for suffering injustice.

By collaborating seamlessly between our team members and maintaining open communication lines ensuring that clients are updated at every stage throughout the process has fostered a respect-based relationship resulting in enhanced client trust on Carlson Bier over years.

We firmly believe everyone should receive strong representation especially during tough times when facing potent adversaries like large corporations or insurance companies. Thus, we operate primarily on contingency basis meaning you don’t pay unless we win obtaining a favorable settlement or jury verdict for you.

At Carlson Bier, the depth of our understanding goes beyond just laws – it extends into empathy compassion knowing how spinal cord injuries can topple lives affect families. We aim not only to get justice through legal means but also work towards creating awareness about severity level preventive measures focusing on societal safety and well-being while leaving no stone unturned holding accountable those responsible for jeopardizing others’ lives recklessly.

Here at Carlson Bier, if there’s one statement which echoes in our halls everyday – “Our Clients Come First”. So why wait longer? Push that button below learn exactly what worth your case is! Start reclaiming control today with us by your side where looking after YOU remains OUR prime focus always. Let’s walk this path towards justice together. Because everyone deserves their day in court and their chance at reparation for the wrongs inflicted upon them.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ursa Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Ursa

Areas of Practice in Ursa

Cycling Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Providing skilled legal advice for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Physician Incompetence

Delivering professional legal support for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Liability

Handling cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal assistance to clients affected by harmful products.

Senior Malpractice

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble & Tumble Occurrences

Adept in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Wounds

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on assisting individuals of car accidents gain appropriate remuneration for wounds and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Big Rig Collision

Ensuring specialist legal support for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Focused on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Brain Impairments

Specializing in delivering expert legal services for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Adept at addressing cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Expert in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unjust Passing

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and expert legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Damage

Dedicated to defending persons with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440