Wrongful Death Attorney in Ursa

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the grueling aftermath of losing a loved one due to another’s negligence, Carlson Bier understands the pain and strives to offer compassionate legal support. We specialize in Wrongful Death cases where we diligently champion for justice, demanding compensation that reflects your loss’s depth. From investigating the accident diligently to negotiating relentlessly for your fair settlement, our expert lawyers navigate these complex claims with prowess that sets us apart from other firms handling personal injury matters.With proficiency gleaned over years securing maximum benefits for clients throughout Illinois, including Ursa residents; Carlson Bier stands as an exemplar in Wrongful Death law practice. Empathy matched with strategic nous distinguishes our approach towards every case we undertake. To speak directly with one reliable lawyer about how best they can help you secure justice after a tragic loss is reassuring. Choosing Carlaon Bier means placing trust in proven experts guided by the principal goal of making things right during incredibly tough times… Carlason Beir: because you deserve nothing less than excellence when everything feels wrong.

About Carlson Bier

Wrongful Death Lawyers in Ursa Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with a particular emphasis on wrongful death cases. Based in Illinois, we are well-versed with state statutes and legal procedures that govern such sensitive claims. Wrongful Death is a grave issue that carries both emotional turmoil for the surviving family and complicated legal considerations. The term refers to an unfortunate circumstance where due to someone else’s negligence or intentional act of harm results in another person’s untimely demise.

Illinois law provides specific regulations surrounding wrongful death claims which every claimant must understand for their case’s success. Under these directives, only certain individuals related to the decedent can file such a lawsuit. Typically this includes immediate family members like spouses, children, parents, and sometimes siblings. It is important noting that suing for wrongful death isn’t about laying blame but seeking rightful compensation for devastating losses which can vary from loss of companionship to financial cost burdens associated with sudden passing.

Having served numerous clients in the region has allowed us to grasp comprehensive understanding of applicable laws as well as exceptions relevant in such lawsuits. Some key details worth remembering include:

• Time limitations within which filing should take place (Statute of Limitations)

• Clear demonstration of negligence on part of accused party

• Tangible proof depicting effects on surviving kin e.g., financial implications resulting from lost earnings

Dealing with grief following loss while also trying to navigate complex legal frameworks takes its toll on survivors causing further distress. Our role at Carlson Bier ensures you do not walk this painful journey alone by providing expert counsel making sure your rights aren’t trampled upon during seeking justice.

Understanding complexity and weighty implications brought forth by wrongful death scenarios means our diligent team will carry out exhaustive investigations regarding each individual case ensuring every critical detail aligns cohesively leading towards successful litigation outcomes.

It’s worth acknowledging that next steps after facing an incident culminating towards wrongful death seem blurry filled with tear-filled confusion. As your legal advocates, our firm helps clear this confusion mapping out specific actionable steps of strength in light of Illinois law.

We advocate for maximum possible compensation duly matching the gravity traumatic loss inflicts on surviving loved ones. Compensation may cover several areas that include but not limited to:

• Loss of financial support derived from deceased.

• Costs associated with burial and funeral services.

• Loss experienced owing to absence of companionship or parental guidance.

It’s undebatable that no amount can truly take away grief mourning families undergo due to wrongful death incidences. However, we strongly believe pursuing these claims offers an ideal path towards rebuilding lives vaguely shattered by such injustices.

Litigating wrongful death lawsuits demands strategic expertise blended efficiently with compassionate understanding- hallmarks personifying each case we handle at Carlson Bier. We’re driven by single-minded pursuit of justice tirelessly dedicated towards uncovering truth crafting favorable outcomes for our clients.

If you or someone close to you is grappling under the weighty despair of a recent untimely passing due to another person’s negligence; know embarking on a lawsuit may seem too overwhelming a task amidst grieving period. This is precisely why reaching out for seasoned professional legal aid becomes imperative liberating you from potential legal hurdles working exclusively towards securing deserved rightful settlement directed towards alleviating some pain and setting course for future recovery.

At Carlson Bier, know beyond being just solicitors; deeply caring allies steadfastly committed guiding you through tumultuous waves seeking closure behind courtroom doors till justice is rightfully served proving dignity even after demise stands fiercely upheld!

Why not start your journey right here? Click the button below to evaluate your case’s worth now. Understanding what’s taking shape can help bring clarity moving forward providing slight relief amidst turbulent times. Procure peace today by allowing us serve as your beacon during stormy moments through unparalleled personalized service distinctly tailored around needs dictated arising form wrongful situations henceforth shielding you from further pain escalating duress.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Ursa Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Wrongful Death FAQ​

Wrongful death occurs when a person’s death is caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person.

The following people may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit:

  • The spouse or children of the deceased
  • The parents of the deceased
  • The siblings of the deceased
  • The personal representative of the deceased’s estate

To prove a wrongful death claim in Illinois, the plaintiff must prove the following elements:

  • The defendant owed the deceased a duty of care.
  • The defendant breached that duty of care.
  • The breach of duty caused the death of the deceased.
  • The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the death of the deceased.

In a wrongful death lawsuit in Illinois, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include lost wages, medical expenses, and funeral expenses.
  • Non-pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the non-financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and loss of parental guidance.

The statute of limitations for wrongful death lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the death to file a lawsuit.

If you have any questions about your legal rights or options after a wrongful death, you should contact an experienced wrongful death attorney.

All Attorney Services in Ursa

Areas of Practice in Ursa

Cycling Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or perilous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Extending expert legal services for individuals of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Healthcare Misconduct

Extending dedicated legal advice for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Accountability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, delivering expert legal help to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking recovery for their losses.

Birth Traumas

Supplying legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Mishaps: Committed to helping clients of car accidents secure appropriate payout for injuries and impairment.

Scooter Collisions

Focused on providing legal support for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Semi Accident

Offering specialist legal advice for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for losses.

Construction Incidents

Concentrated on advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Brain Impairments

Specializing in delivering specialized legal representation for patients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Specialized in handling cases for clients who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Dedicated to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unfair Fatality

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Neural Trauma

Expert in assisting persons with vertebral damage, offering expert legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer