FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Utica

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or your loved one has been a victim of dog bite injuries in Utica, trust none other than Carlson Bier to aggressively advocate for your rights. With extensive experience in personal injury law and specifically, dog bite incidents, we are fully equipped to handle the complexities that such cases entail. Our attorneys invest substantial time and resources into thorough investigations to ensure all facts of the case are comprehensively laid out before presenting them for litigation. We understand how traumatic these experiences can be; therefore our compassionate team provides consistent support while ensuring meticulous legal uptake on your behalf. Looking beyond the physical wounds, we delve into psychological impacts as well considering future medical costs with expertise making us stand out in what we do best – fighting for justice diligently and decisively! Striving tirelessly until fair compensation is secured indicates why Carlson Bier remains at forefront in handling dog bite injury claims across Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Utica Illinois

At Carlson Bier, a distinguished Personal Injury Attorney Group based in Illinois, we fully comprehend the magnitude of suffering and emotional distress caused by dog bite injuries. Experiencing such an incident can be traumatic, which is why our dedicated team of professionals are ready to guide you through the muddled legal complexities that may follow.

A dog bite injury isn’t just about physical harm; its ramifications are multifaceted. As such, it’s essential to understand that these cases involve not only medical but possibly psychological impacts as well. This lends complexity to determining rightful compensation. Fortunately, at Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with a particular emphasis on guiding victims of dog bite injuries.

In Illinois, ensuring owner responsibility for their pets is paramount in mitigating dog bite occurrences. However, when instances occur where this protection falls short — and results in pain or trauma inflicted upon individuals — certain legal parameters come into play:

– The Animal Control Act: In accordance with Illinois regulations under this act, pet owners inherit liability for any injuries or damages occasioned by their pets.

– Strict Liability Rule: A key attribute of personal injury law in cases concerning domestic animals like dogs implicates strict liability on the part of the owner if their pet causes harm.

One noteworthy aspect of handling such legal cases involves demonstrating evidence rather than proving negligence on behalf of the pet owner. Reduxing litigation challenges encountered due to approximating carelessness falls within our expertise.

Prevalency speaks volumes about how sustained we are towards these unique situations — understanding minor versus severe bites: puncture wounds and lacerations as opposed another dimensional variation involving infection risks and possible disfigurement consequences; timely medical attention need vis-a-vis managing long-term effects including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Our primary aim concerns your full recovery—both physically and emotionally—and ensuring you receive optimal compensation reflective of your experience.

Illinois adheres staunchly to traditional aspects of common law, which tends to favor the victim in cases like these. Variation within the spectrum ranges from straightforward medical expenses and lost wages to compensation for pain, suffering, and emotional distress. Formulating an exact amount can be a daunting task given the multifaceted factors that need due consideration. This is where our expertise translates into an unparallel advantage yielding results exceeding expectations.

Complying explicitly with Illinois state laws, we hold high regard for ethical advertising norms. As responsible members of legal society safeguarding client trust remains our paramount duty—exemplified by this clarifying announcement: while our influence extends statewide — readily serving clients far and wide across Illinois including locations like Utica — our physical presence remains anchored exclusively to trusted Carlson Bier locations established in cities stipulated by law.

Having maneuvered intricate legal networks fortified with comprehensive knowledge amassed over years of experience; we extend a practical promise riddled with hints of empathy and endless support required dealing with calamitous situations as such.

Gain closure after your traumatic ordeal inflicted by dog bite injuries without surrendering your rights or settling for less than fair compensation you deserve. Our professionally astute team at Carlson Bier extends their services transforming this prospect into reality ensuring justice prevail on unionizing terms balanced compassionately towards victims combating aftermaths involving post-traumatic stress disorder and psychological depression sustained during the incident.

Empowered by extensive know-how rooted deeply within corridors of personal injury law surrounding complexities coming part-and-parcel following dog bite incidents—we are here to advocate dedicatedly making sure you never feel alone waging battles against odds seemingly tipped unfavorably tilted either way!

Your pain endures beyond physical impressions; it imprints psychologically needing focused attention drafted judging severity proportions viewed through lenses concentrating light upon holistic healing covering aspects ranging physical recuperation unto establishing emotional equanimity redefining normalcy parameters realigning disrupted life scales rebalancing poised stability all over again.

Our free case evaluation tool empowers your search for justice. Click the button below and discover the true worth of your personal injury claim. With Carlson Bier, you’re assured of an experience grounded on personalized care and expert legal guidance—a beacon guiding your pursuit towards well-deserved compensation and a happier, healthier future.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Utica Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Utica

Areas of Practice in Utica

Cycling Incidents

Focused on legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Supplying specialist legal services for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Clinical Misconduct

Providing expert legal advice for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Accountability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, delivering specialist legal assistance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Malpractice

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Trip Occurrences

Expert in managing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking redress for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Accidents

Incidents: Devoted to aiding clients of car accidents secure just payout for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Accident

Providing expert legal representation for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for damages.

Building Incidents

Committed to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Neurological Traumas

Focused on extending professional legal services for patients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Demise

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and experienced legal services to ensure fairness.

Spine Trauma

Expert in representing victims with paralysis, offering compassionate legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440