Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Utica

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the unfortunate event of a slip and fall accident in Utica, prompt action can make all the difference. Turn to Carlson Bier – a premier personal injury law firm whose outstanding record speaks volumes of their prowess in handling such accidents effectively. Their seasoned attorneys proactively analyze your case’s unique aspects to ensure you receive full compensation for damages suffered. Acknowledged for their meticulous approach in accumulating substantial evidence and constructing fail-proof defense strategies, they are widely regarded as formidable advocates within the realm of Slip And Fall Accidents litigation. As relentless champions fighting on behalf of victims, Carlson Bier routinely secures favorable verdicts reflecting their commitment to justice and professionalism. They meticulously handle all facets associated with these complex claims—painstakingly sifting through medical records or negotiating settlements–to alleviate clients’ stress during such difficult times, reinforcing why countless individuals entrust them as their preferred legal companions when navigating challenging Slip And Fall scenarios in Utica area.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Utica Illinois

As a seasoned personal injury law firm, Carlson Bier provides vigorous representation for victims who have been injured due to slip and fall accidents. These accidents can occur anywhere – supermarkets, restaurants, office buildings, private residences- causing serious injuries that range from minor cuts and bruises to severe fractures and long-term disability. As the victim of such an ordeal, it’s crucial to understand your rights in seeking the compensation you rightfully deserve.

Slip and fall incidents are categorized under premises liability claims in Illinois state laws. Property owners – both public and private – have a legal obligation to maintain safe conditions on their property or warn visitors about potential hazards. When they fail to do so, leading to an accident and subsequent injury, they can be held accountable for negligence.

Here are some pivotal aspects of slip-and-fall cases:

• Evidence is crucial: Photographs of the scene immediately following the incident can illustrate what caused the accident while detailed medical records prove the extent of your injuries.

• Timeliness matters: Illinois imposes a statute of limitations which allows two years from-date-of-injury to file suits against negligent parties. The sooner you initiate proceedings with us at Carlson Bier, the better we can start gathering substantial evidence for your case.

• Severity counts: The impact on your life post-accident greatly influences claim amounts; this could range from temporary pain through recovery period disruption up-to long-term health issues preventing return-to-work.

While these points lay down a clear path before you navigate through processes involved with filing claims after slip-and-fall accidents; understanding specific legal jargon or complex procedures may pose challenges especially when dealing with recovery—physical or mental trauma—as victims often do post-such incidents. For getting best possible outcomes from such personal injury cases, having capable legal representation — like our team at Carlson Bier — will help safeguarding your interests while providing smooth sailing during court proceedings or settlement negotiations.

Our commitment extends beyond just courtroom advocacy. At Carlson Bier, we believe in holistic representation for our clients. Our competent lawyers not only relentlessly pursue your claim but also guide you through each step of the legal process – answering queries, decoding convoluted terms or procedures – we are there with you throughout.

Having handled myriad personal injury cases within Illinois, including numerous successful slip and fall cases, our depth of experience equips us to deliver results that exceed expectations systematically. Remember: each case is unique and warrants individual attention while processing evidence or debating negligence — an aspect that forms second-nature to our seasoned team.

In summary, dealing with a slip-and-fall accident can prove taxing on many fronts—emotional distress due to physical condition post-incident, crumbling medical bills combined with work-absence resulting loss-of-pay; during such demanding times it becomes vital to find someone who can expertly guide through labyrinthine legal alleys towards rightful compensation for incurred hardships.

At Carlson Bier, we strive continuously aiming for stellar outcomes benefitting clients involved with personal injury cases — their satisfaction serves as the true testimony to our commitment and dedication maifested via hardship purposedly undertaken while battling against negligent entities causing undue pain and suffering.

Are you grappling after a debilitating slip-and-fall incident? Is mounting paperwork from healthcare providers adding stress to already painful bodily injuries? Let us help navigate these choppy waters. Please click the button below—our dedicated professionals will evaluate circumstances regarding your particular accident followed by offering initial assessment about potential value associated with resultant claims—and start taking steps towards recouping what rightfully belongs to you!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Utica Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Utica

Areas of Practice in Utica

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Expert in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Extending adept legal help for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Healthcare Carelessness

Delivering expert legal assistance for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, extending professional legal guidance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Mistreatment

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Tumble Accidents

Expert in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking recovery for their suffering.

Infant Wounds

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Incidents: Dedicated to aiding patients of car accidents obtain just recompense for hurts and losses.

Scooter Incidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Big Rig Collision

Delivering adept legal assistance for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just claims for losses.

Building Crashes

Concentrated on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Neurological Injuries

Specializing in offering specialized legal advice for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Skilled in handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Committed to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Undeserved Passing

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and adept legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Expert in assisting individuals with paralysis, offering dedicated legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer