Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Utica

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can be life-altering, and this is when the experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier enter your journey towards justice. As observers of accurate Illinois laws, we are committed to offering you skillful representation, acting as staunch advocates amidst challenging times. Our focus on Spinal Cord Injuries extends beyond just legal rhetoric; it’s about delivering unwavering support for our clients seeking fair compensation in Utica’s courtrooms.

Why trust us? At Carlson Bier, competence meets compassion while championing your rights – that’s not merely a promise but part of our professional code. We ensure every case gets personalized attention and remains under expert supervision until closure. Cutting-edge legal strategies coupled with an empathetic approach towards each client set us apart.

Victims of Spinal Cord Injuries demand more than contentment with financial restitution; they deserve understanding too. And who better to provide these essentials than seasoned attorneys like those at Carlson Bier? So if you or a loved one has suffered such trauma relating to spinal cord injuries – don’t face it alone, take advantage of the exceptional advocacy only we deliver among personal injury lawyers serving Utica.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Utica Illinois

Welcome to the Carlson Bier page, your number one personal injury law firm in Illinois. Our seasoned team of attorneys is dedicated to not only handling your legal needs but also providing comprehensive insight and education on personal injury matters. The focus today will be on spinal cord injuries (SCI), a delicate subject that affects many lives every day.

Spinal cord injuries can be life-altering events with severe consequences, impacting victims physically, emotionally, and financially. These types of injuries typically result from sudden damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of their spinal canal – causing permanent changes in strength, sensation, and bodily functions below the site of injury. Understanding its complexities is key as a patient or caregiver navigating through legal options for compensation.

Understandably these incidents occur under various circumstances ranging from automobile accidents, falls, sports-related injuries, industrial mishaps to violent encounters. Many sufferers might find it challenging dealing with medical bills and rehabilitation costs post-injury as well as grappling with possible partial or total disability.

• Physical Therapy: This plays an essential role in managing SCI. The goal usually involves improving physical functioning while maintaining good overall health.

• Occupational Therapy: Often coupled with physical therapy helps ensure the injured person can perform regular daily living activities.

• Medical Care: Regular checkups represent a substantial part necessarily aimed at preventing secondary issues like muscle contractures etc.

• Assistive Devices: Wheelchairs or walking aids may be necessary depending on the severity of SCI which are crucial for independent movement but pose additional costs.

Given these factors significant financial burden becomes apparent; hence we want you fully aware making informed decisions when seeking solicitation services.

At Carlson Bier our commitment goes beyond representing victims against those responsible for SCIs irrespective of accident type. It’s about ensuring clients enjoy full justice for every pain endured & each penny spent towards recovery consequently improving their quality of life immensely after suffering a debilitating incident.

Our duo approach first involves relentlessly pursuing appropriate reimbursement for the victim on various paths like recovery of lost wages, footing medical bills thereby watering down the chance for you to bear any out-of-pocket expenses. Secondly, we dedicate time to educate & help you comprehend legal complexities when dealing with SCI thus making life easier post-litigation.

Our award-winning team of attorneys boasts extensive experience in these types of cases and has a unique understanding of the hurdles SCI victims face daily. With our compassionate approach and dedication to strong work ethics, we ensure clients are treated with utmost respect while tirelessly fighting for their rights.

We have garnered an impressive track record across Illinois through professional service delivery that bolsters claim strength leading us towards maximizing your deserving damages. We extend our dedication into demonstrating a compelling argument on your behalf holding responsible parties accountable ensuring every bit of payable compensations is reclaimed by our esteemed clients.

In summary encapsulating Carlson Bier firm’s core values from robust litigation skills backed up by widespread spinal cord injuries knowledge providing comprehensive understanding necessary when tackling such sensitive claims; stands tall as Illinois top personal injury law office.

Accidents causing SCIs can be extremely daunting transforming lives drastically but partaking in quick-recovery processes commences by asserting the rightful legal steps safeguarding your interests ensuring fair compensation rather than suffering alone.

Interested in finding out more about how much your case may be worth? Pivotal decisions begin here! Simply click on the button below encouraging opportunities comprising free case reviews offering great clarity on probable step-forward actions based upon pertaining facts fostered creating lasting solutions combating spinal cord injuries aftermaths.

Let Carlson Bier translate decades’ worth experience helping people just like you redeem hope teaching power perseverance not withholding tremendous changes profound deviations encountered during such unfortunate incidents because panicking isn’t an option although grace resides within surviving reality’s harsh blows transcending beyond human comprehension.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Utica Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Utica

Areas of Practice in Utica

Bike Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Extending expert legal advice for victims of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Hospital Carelessness

Extending specialist legal assistance for patients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Liability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal help to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Stumble Incidents

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking compensation for their injuries.

Neonatal Damages

Supplying legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Incidents

Incidents: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents gain just recompense for wounds and harm.

Scooter Accidents

Focused on providing legal services for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Big Rig Collision

Ensuring adept legal representation for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Traumas

Specializing in extending specialized legal services for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at tackling cases for people who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Specializing in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Demise

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Focused on supporting patients with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer