Wrongful Death Attorney in Valmeyer

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you find yourself in a situation where you’re facing the aftermath of a wrongful death, trust in the expertise and commitment of our passionate legal team at Carlson Bier. Dedicated to serving Valmeyer residents relentlessly, we navigate through these tragic instances with compassion and astute legal proficiency. We prioritize your needs diligently, understanding that no amount can adequately compensate for your loss. However, obtaining justice is our driving force; ensuring those responsible are held accountable while managing financial burdens from medical costs or lost wages. Substantively experienced in Illinois’ complex wrongful death laws, we offer competence unmatched by others — honoring each case’s peculiarity with unique strategies designed for success backed by an impressive track record worth betting on. At Carlson Bier, meticulous attention to detail meets relentless pursuit of justice tor wrongful deaths – valiantly advocating for closure and delivering peace imperative during such tough times surrounding devastation left behind due to negligent actions of others causing fatal consequences.

About Carlson Bier

Wrongful Death Lawyers in Valmeyer Illinois

Navigating the aftermath of a traumatic event can be challenging, especially when it results in the loss of a loved one. When such tragic circumstances are attributed to another person’s negligence or intentional actions, they’re commonly recognized under the legal term ‘Wrongful Death.’ At Carlson Bier, we understand your pain and aim to assist you through this difficult period.

Wrongful death constitutes cases where an individual dies due to unlawful action or gross negligence of others. It falls under civil law and is separate from criminal homicide cases, even though both may overlap on certain occasions with similar facts. Should there be evidence suggesting wrongful death, survivors and family members can file a claim against those responsible.

One crucial point to remember is that wrongful death claims must be filed within a specified time frame after the person’s demise known as the statute of limitations. In Illinois, this window typically lasts until two years after the date of death. Exceptions exist for certain situations; however, waiting too long could potentially bar one from filing their claim.

There are numerous causes behind wrongful deaths – motor vehicle crashes account for a significant number followed by medical malpractice while slip-and-fall accidents also contribute significantly. Other causes can trace back to workplace incidents or defective products highlighting just how broad-ranging wrongful death scenarios could become.

Successfully arguing a wrongful death case involves proving several elements. First, demonstrating clear negligence or intent from defendants constitutes primarily instrumental argumentation aspects in most instances. Furthermore, drawing direct correlations between defended conduct and sustained injuries resulting in each tragic circumstance becomes essential along with detailing incurred financial expenditure wrought by every loss experienced during these unfortunate events throughout its entirety.

Wrongful death claims involve more than merely identifying responsible parties following tragic circumstances – they help families access much-needed repairative justice following profound personal losses bringing closure amidst overwhelming grief allowing fragments resemblance restored semblance normality return lives engulfed unimaginable sorrow consequence others’ negligent acts behavior patterns showcasing irresponsibility careless attitudes elsewhere entirely neglectful others’ safety general.

In wrongful death claims, various types of damages can be pursued. These include economic damages such as burial or funeral costs, lost wages the decedent would’ve earned in their lifetime and medical expenses incurred before death. Non-economic damages include emotional suffering, loss of companionship and consortium.

Taking on these complex issues by yourself may seem overwhelming; thus seeking professional assistance becomes imperative. Carlson Bier has been at the forefront of personal injury laws in Illinois offering a diligent team well-versed with judicial intricacies surrounding wrongful death cases. Our commitment extends to delicately handle your case understanding that this represents more than a legal dispute but deeply personal situation impacting numerous lives significantly during exceedingly trying times.

Our professional approach is founded on empathy combined with rigorous knowledge application delivering compassionate counsel necessary representing interests strong persistent representation court whenever such situations arise demanding our utmost attention dedication catering client’s needs requirements thoughtfully considerate manner ensuring they receive due compensation rightful claim acknowledging pain suffering experienced part deceased individuals family members alike left scarred unforgettable tragic events initiated irresponsible actions other parties involved.

We strongly believe each case deserves personalized service, expert legal advice and fierce courtroom representation; we provide just that enthusiastically whilst playing pivotal role throughout every step legal proceedings providing much-needed support strength past alleged ordeal while bringing wrongdoers justice simultaneously – serving dual goals effectively competently thereafter continuously onward subsequent steps forward from outset itself overall entirety incorporating every detail leaving significant stone unturned respect achieving desired outcomes success rates improving thereby substantially overall consistently rapidly progressively inevitably usual terms understood concerned invested parties largely immensely quite straightforwardly transparently relatively familiar generality most due openness clearly profoundly intensively holistically accurately without missing crucial aspects often neglected overlooked skipped elsewhenever elsewhere other firms altogether entirely completely thoroughly specifically aptly rightly so unfortunately indeed quite especially then thereupon upon consequently ensuing litigation disputes arguments submissions defences also oppositions mounting increasing growing troubling circumstances encountered faced directly indirectly through third-party interference disturbance interruption delay postponement.

Ready to learn more about your legal options? You’re only a click away. Click on the button below to find out how much your case could potentially be worth, and let Carlson Bier stand side by side with you through this arduous journey.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Valmeyer Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Wrongful Death FAQ​

Wrongful death occurs when a person’s death is caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person.

The following people may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit:

  • The spouse or children of the deceased
  • The parents of the deceased
  • The siblings of the deceased
  • The personal representative of the deceased’s estate

To prove a wrongful death claim in Illinois, the plaintiff must prove the following elements:

  • The defendant owed the deceased a duty of care.
  • The defendant breached that duty of care.
  • The breach of duty caused the death of the deceased.
  • The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the death of the deceased.

In a wrongful death lawsuit in Illinois, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include lost wages, medical expenses, and funeral expenses.
  • Non-pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the non-financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and loss of parental guidance.

The statute of limitations for wrongful death lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the death to file a lawsuit.

If you have any questions about your legal rights or options after a wrongful death, you should contact an experienced wrongful death attorney.

All Attorney Services in Valmeyer

Areas of Practice in Valmeyer

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Offering specialist legal help for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing expert legal assistance for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Obligation

Managing cases involving problematic products, offering skilled legal assistance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Stumble Incidents

Adept in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Birth Traumas

Delivering legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Incidents: Dedicated to assisting victims of car accidents obtain appropriate settlement for harms and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Collision

Ensuring adept legal advice for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for hurts.

Building Crashes

Dedicated to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Neurological Traumas

Expert in delivering expert legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Injuries

Adept at addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Fatality

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and experienced legal representation to ensure compensation.

Neural Damage

Focused on defending victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal representation to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer