...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Vandalia

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you are looking for a trusted, committed and experienced Dog Bite Injury attorney to handle your case in Vandalia, consider choosing Carlson Bier. We understand the pain, trauma and financial distress that dog bite injuries can cause. For years we have been steadfastly representing clients affected by dog bite incidents, ensuring they receive fair compensation for their suffering. Our team is highly skilled at navigating the complex civil litigation process involved with these cases. At Carlson Bier we believe in tirelessly advocating on behalf of our clients because justice matters most to us – money cannot undo emotional hardship but proper legal representation can bring peace of mind during difficult times. With every case handled, our expertise grows stronger; this has resulted solid reputation upheld through countless successful claims managed around Illinois over the past years.We make it easier for you – so why not choose expert help from Carlson Bier? Let us be your support so that you can focus on healing while we focus on winning!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Vandalia Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the emotional and physical trauma a dog bite can inflict. Garnering years of experience in Illinois, our committed personal injury attorneys stand ready to assist victims maneuver through the complex straits of legal action with ease and professionalism. Dog Bite Injuries, although perceived by many to seem simple or trivial, often present an array of convoluted legal intricacies which require robust expertise – this is where we excel.

Certainly, when it comes to Dog Bite cases under Illinois law, several pivotal facets invariably come into play:

• Identification of the dog owner: A primary step towards building your case involves exact identification of the dog’s rightful owner.

• Confirmation that you were legally where the incident occurred: To validate your claim it is essential that you are able to demonstrate an unequivocal right to be at the location at the time of said occurrence.

• Absence of provocation: The assurance that there was no provocation on your part leading up to the attack must also be established beyond reproach.

In essence, these three checkpoints form a milestone trio whose successful navigation paves way for affirmative compensation.

Acknowledging every pain point associated with dog bite injuries such as medical expenses incurred due to treatments like surgery or rehabilitation; lost wages if unable to work; mental distress – they all collectively intensify pain and suffering endured by victims post traumatic event. Our role at Carlson Bier is multi-fold, not only do we decipher complex legislation for you but are dedicated in ensuring fair compensation recovery.

We employ specialist strategies tailored around nuanced aspects each case manifests. For instance:

• Pain/Suffering Compensation: We explore avenues within Legal provisions in Illinois Law assigning value against non-economic damages.

• Medical Expense Recovery: Redressing medical expenses forms another crucial component across cases; from hospital bills through medication receipts brought under retrospective review.

• Loss earnings & Future Earnings impact estimation analysis done meticulously – providing realism laden financial loss evaluation accruing due to victim’s inability to earn at former capacity.

Incorporating expertise, experience and exemplary commitment – Carlson Bier stands as your beacon in navigating legal straits post an unfortunate event.

We understand that contemplating a lawsuit can be daunting, especially consider not knowing how much compensation you could legally be entitled upon winning the case. Our firm, however, makes this element of uncertainty smoother for victims or their family member/s who are pursuing lawsuits against dog owners whose negligence caused injury. That’s why we encourage all visitors interested in exploring value potential assigned for their unique case – to click on the button below. An estimated value projection shall help reveal tangible insight showcasing what you may stand to gain when your case is arbitrated successfully.

Committed in serving residents of Illinois State bound by proper jurisdictional laws; Carlson Bier stands ready and keen on perusing queries springing from any corner across the state. Proving ourselves time & again through our impressive track record has solidified our affinity towards ensuring justice delivery via apt compensation recovery under patronable Illinois Law frames.

Remember, a personal injury claim isn’t just about getting justice for past anguish but also safeguarding future potentiality torpedoed due to someone else’s reckless actions. Gain clarity over your legal position today – Click below and journey towards discernible peace of mind with us.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Vandalia Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Vandalia

Areas of Practice in Vandalia

Bike Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Damages

Offering skilled legal assistance for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Offering experienced legal support for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Liability

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing specialist legal support to customers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Neglect

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Slip Accidents

Skilled in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking redress for their harm.

Birth Damages

Offering legal support for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Accidents

Crashes: Dedicated to supporting clients of car accidents receive just recompense for damages and destruction.

Motorcycle Crashes

Specializing in providing representation for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Accident

Extending specialist legal assistance for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for injuries.

Construction Mishaps

Dedicated to assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cognitive Impairments

Committed to providing dedicated legal support for victims suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Adept at tackling cases for people who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal representation to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Injury

Dedicated to supporting persons with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​