FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Vandalia

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier is an esteemed personal injury law firm that understands the intricacies, complexities and trauma associated with pedestrian accidents. When it comes to such devastating circumstances, residents of Vandalia have come to appreciate the immense expertise and dedication this highly qualified group brings. Their capable legal team goes above and beyond in fighting for justice on behalf of those affected by a pedestrian accident, relentlessly advocating for rightful compensation every step of the way. With their extensive knowledge of Illinois laws surrounding these situations, Carlson Bier ensures you establish a compelling case tailored specifically to your unique circumstances. Their profound insights allow them to untangle all legal nuances strategically while creating personalized strategies that potentially lead to successful outcomes in courtrooms or at negotiation tables extensively improving your chances for victory. Carson Bier doesn’t just handle cases; they significantly invest in their clients’ lives because they genuinely care about making a difference where it truly matters – bringing light into seemingly hopeless situations after experiencing unanticipated pedestrian accidents in Vandalia.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Vandalia Illinois

Navigating the legal landscape after being involved in a pedestrian accident can be daunting, and that is why Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, brings to your service decades of experience dealing with such cases. We understand how emotionally challenging these circumstances can be for both victims and their families.

A pedestrian accident can occur due to various reasons such as distracted driving, reckless speeding, left-turn collisions or ignoring traffic signals. Yet many individuals remain unaware of their rights when confronting this traumatizing event. Those injured have the right to recover damages for medical bills, loss of wages due to inability to work during recovery and potential future earnings if the victim becomes permanently unable to continue one’s occupation along with compensation for emotional distress.

Designing a case strategy requires comprehensive understanding of state- specific nuances that distinguish Illinois’ Personal Injury Laws from other jurisdictions:

• The role of comparative negligence: It allows settlement distribution according to one’s involvement; therefore having dedicated representation ensures you are not unjustly declared ‘at fault’.

• Statutes of Limitations: An individual generally has two years from the date of injury to file a lawsuit in Illinois. Missed deadlines could unfortunately negate legitimate claims.

Despite public safety measures taken by government authorities like traffic calming installations and passenger protection laws – accidents occur. Understanding underlying reasons assists us in establishing liability so you’re justly compensated:

• Driver Negligence including texting while driving or DUIs are common causes.

• Intentional Recklessness where pedestrians are purposely targeted.

• Product Liability where malfunctioning auto-equipment leads to unintentional harm caused,

• Situational Accidents involving complex cases like jaywalking or child dart-outs require professional review.

Carlson Bier specializes in all kinds of personal injury lawsuits hinging on complete knowledge about Insurance Policies pertaining specifics within MedPay Coverages and Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Protection claim proceedings often disregarded by victims. Thorough comprehension of these facets guarantees cases are favorably presented to insurance adjusters or courtrooms, if it comes down to that.

We take our responsibilities seriously understanding the ripple effects pedestrian accidents have on lives. Our committed approach ensures open communication regarding case proceedings and transparent information regarding potential outcomes allowing you make informed decisions. We work tirelessly aiming for maximum possible return under Illinois law keeping in mind your need for physical and mental recovery alongside legal resolution.

Despite intricate collaboration with medical providers along-with expert investigators – we only charge fees when you win! This contingency-based model prioritizes your needs above everything else: You do not pay, unless you receive reparation. Ensuring unequaled service delivery, we operate based upon maintaining trustworthiness throughout client interactions.

Maintaining unwavering dedication paired with relentless commitment; Carlson Bier proves being more than just ‘a’ personal injury lawyer — We consistently strive towards becoming ‘your’ Personal Injury Lawyer here at home within state boundaries stretching from Mount Vernon to Springfield including numerous locations statewide baring Vandalia.

Don’t let stress delay your justice— Remember every single minute can be crucial in documenting evidence leading towards a solid testimony — Your immediate initiative can protect rights allowing rightful damage reclaiming shaping the difference between common vs. exceptional representation while rectifying unjust occurrences through legal means.

Ready to discover how much is your case worth? Well-informed decision-making is the initial step towards fair compensation! So choose action over anxiety by clicking the button below.”

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Vandalia Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Vandalia

Areas of Practice in Vandalia

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Extending adept legal services for patients of major burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Providing professional legal advice for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Responsibility

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending adept legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Trip Incidents

Adept in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their injuries.

Infant Damages

Supplying legal aid for families affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Mishaps

Accidents: Devoted to aiding victims of car accidents gain appropriate compensation for injuries and losses.

Motorbike Incidents

Specializing in providing legal advice for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Semi Incident

Providing specialist legal support for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for losses.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Specializing in ensuring compassionate legal services for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at managing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Demise

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and adept legal services to ensure compensation.

Neural Injury

Expert in advocating for clients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​