...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Venice

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier, a highly reputable personal injury attorney group in Illinois, specializes in handling Dog Bite Injuries with precision and compassion. With a remarkable record of securing justice for victims of dog bite injuries, Carlson Bier brings to the table years of expertise complemented by an empathetic legal approach. Their proficiency extends beyond ordinary boundaries as they meticulously analyze every nuanced aspect of your case ensuring thorough representation—keep trust firm and resolute that these attorneys fully comprehend both the emotional turmoil you may be experiencing along with the complex legal implications involved. Ensuring fair compensation is just one element; Carlson Bier’s equally critical aim towards making potentially intimidating courtroom scenarios understandable ensures clients receive comfort admixed with practical resolution strategies. Selecting Carlson Bier for your Dog Bite Injury claim represents an optimal choice—not merely reflecting our standing within Illinois but also asserting it as proof—an affirmation we consistently go above and beyond when championing our client’s rights in dog bite injury cases irrespective of geographical locations or circumstance complexities.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Venice Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in navigating the complex legal landscape of personal injury law. While our expertise spans the broad spectrum of personal injury fields, today’s focus is on dog bite injuries – an area that many may not consider until they are faced with such a traumatic incident. As Illinois-based attorneys with vast experience in this domain, we want to educate you about pack behavior and biting tendencies taken straight from canine science.

To begin, it’s essential to understand the severity and potential ramifications of dog bite incidents. They can be physically impactful and emotionally overwhelming for victims, leading to grave injuries including but not limited to deep skin wounds, bone fractures, infections (such as rabies), psychological trauma or at worst, fatalities.

There exist specific laws in Illinois concerning dog owners’ responsibilities and liabilities when their pet attacks another person. In Illinois under the Animal Control Act (“the Act”), if a dog or other animal bites or attacks a person without provocation while that individual is “in any place where he may lawfully be”, the owner can be held legally liable for their pet’s actions which includes full compensation for incurred medical costs and associated damages related due to emotional distress.

– Provocation being defined as deliberate harmful action against the animal.

– Lawful presence implying that victim wasn’t trespassing or committing a crime.

It’s crucial also to mention an important feature of “the Act”; its strictly liability driven nature meaning regardless whether or not a pet has shown prior signs of violent tendency; unless factors like provocation exists even then owner is held accountable for their pet’s actions.

Another critical point concerns time limits for filing lawsuits for dog bite cases; according to Illinois Statute of Limitations one has two years from date of getting bitten by a dog to file personal injury lawsuit. This warrants immediate taking up legal counsel post-injury so necessary steps get taken before it becomes too late potentially resulting in loss of opportunity for compensation recovery.

At Carlson Bier, we take an individualized approach to each case and client. Our goal is to steer you through the legal process with clarity, ensuring that your rights are well protected as per Illinois law regarding dog bites injury cases.

Us striving consistently for championing victim’s rights and getting justice served injects deeper meaning into our work beyond regular professional commitments. We’re a dedicated team who painstakingly understand specificities entailing dog bite injuries assuring relentless pursuit for compensation deserving clients ought to get.

Lastly, it’s important to keep in mind that every case differs slightly depending on the specifics of the circumstances surrounding each incident. The amount of potential compensation can vary greatly from one case to another based on variables like behavioural history of dog involved or degree and nature of damages sustained by victims amongst others.

It’s more than about healing wounds; its partial restoration normal life prior untoward incidence which is precisely what we at Carlson Bier seek entail achieving for our esteemed clientele against their fight seeking rightful restitution post dog-bite incidence.

If wondering what avenue could your cause possibly traverse legally speaking or wanting finding out how much potentially worth is your dog bite injury case click below button right away! At Carlson Bier, leading team personal injury attorneys based right in Illinois aiding successfully countless people just like you secure utmost deserved compensations waits ready evaluating your prospects thoroughly.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Venice Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Venice

Areas of Practice in Venice

Bike Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or dangerous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Extending expert legal services for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Medical Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal advice for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Responsibility

Handling cases involving dangerous products, supplying professional legal guidance to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Neglect

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Tumble Accidents

Specialist in managing trip accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking redress for their damages.

Newborn Injuries

Delivering legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Concentrated on guiding clients of car accidents get just compensation for hurts and harm.

Motorcycle Collisions

Committed to providing legal advice for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Crash

Offering experienced legal representation for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Engaged in representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Head Traumas

Expert in extending expert legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at managing cases for victims who have suffered damages from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Fatality

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and expert legal services to ensure restitution.

Spine Harm

Dedicated to advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​