...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Vermont

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has been involved in a pedestrian accident in Vermont, the Carlson Bier Group is your perfect ally. As seasoned Pedestrian Accident attorneys, we possess vast knowledge and expertise to proficiently navigate complex legal landscapes surrounding such accidents. Carlson Bier is dedicated to securing full compensation for victims who have experienced pain, suffering, or loss as pedestrians. We understand how traumatic these incidents can be and handle each case with utmost empathy and confidentiality.

Our diligent team conducts thorough investigations thus ensuring all responsible parties are held accountable. Leveraging our extensive law practice combined with aggressive advocacy strategies, we endeavor to get justice served promptly without stretching the emotional scar of litigation processes.

At Carlson Bier not only do we offer expert consultation but also contingency-based services – there’s no fee unless we win your case! Because protecting pedestrian rights isn’t only our job; it’s our commitment.

Don’t let your rights go undefended after a pedestrian-related injury – opt for an absolutely free initial evaluation by reaching out to us today at Carlson Bier Group where fighting for you forms our core ethos.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Vermont Illinois

Carlson Bier Associates is one of Illinois’ top-tier law firms specializing in personal injury cases, proudly leading the legal fray on behalf of injured parties. We employ an astute and dedicated team of attorneys who tirelessly advocate for victims of pedestrian accidents, ensuring they receive due compensation. Our goal is to support you efficiently and wholeheartedly, should you become a casualty in this unfortunate incidence.

Pedestrian accidents can occur unexpectedly and result from various factors such as driver negligence including speeding, distraction or impairment, failure to yield the right-of-way at crosswalks or non-compliance with traffic signals. Severe weather conditions may also contribute towards creating risky environments susceptible to these incidents. In many situations, pedestrians stand an unequal chance against motorized vehicles which leaves them highly vulnerable to severe injuries like bone fractures, traumatic brain injuries or even fatal harm.

Effectively dealing with pedestrian accident cases necessitates an intricate comprehension of the state-specific laws and regulations governing such matters. For instance:

• In Illinois both drivers and pedestrians are legally compelled to exercise reasonable care.

• Not all circumstances may automatically deem drivers liable as contributory negligence may apply where pedestrians might also bear some fault.

• Claims ought to be filed within the stipulated statute of limitations (usually two years post-accident) otherwise they could be dismissed.

Comprehending these statutes can pose quite a daunting task – that’s why Carlson Bier is here for you. Our proficient attorneys possess an intimate understanding of Illinois’ pedestrian laws hence equipping us with unmatched litigation skills successfully utilized in numerous past representations.

Filing claims entails more than just proving liability; it involves appropriately quantifying losses suffered into monetary terms – compensatory damages. These reflect costs incurred due to medical bills, lost wages during recovery period as well as possible future financial ramifications brought about by prolonged treatments or per-haps disability-induced job loss. Non-economic impacts like pain suffering cannot be overlooked either; their subjectivity however complicates their valuation.

Fortunately, our legal experts also carry significant experience in pushing for maximum compensation while navigating these complexities. Using strategic methodologies and persuasive negotiation tact, we diligently pursue your rights to fair repayment and justice from those responsible.

Notably, pedestrian accidents may involve more than just individuals; sometimes corporations might be dragged into the equation too especially when examining vehic-ular malfunctions as the cause of accidents. In such scenarios, our firm utilizes its extensive resources in dissecting potential product liability issues – a testament to our holistic legal approach which ultimately facilitates comprehensive resolutions benefitting you holistically.

By choosing Carlson Bier Associates, you will gain an ally that keeps personal interests at heart through every litigation phase – right from comprehending what constitutes your eligibility for claims up until ensuring timely receipt full set-tlement proceeds under Illinois laws.

Every case is treated uniquely with a tailored strategy because we understand that each client bears distinct needs amid multi-faceted impacts precipitated by pedestrian accidents. Importantly, this leads us towards leveraging crucial details holding vast potentials of influencing courts’ decisions favorably on your behalf eventually delivering rightful satisfaction as deserved.

If you’re grappling with this unfortunate predicament wondering how much your claim could potentially fetch or perhaps seeking general legal redress over pedestrian accident matters – hesitate no further! Click on the button below now! Let’s muster all resources towards exploring how best Carlson Bier can serve your current needs optimally preserving your financial security amidst healing via subsequent recovery steps or management of lasting damages if any endured.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Vermont Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Vermont

Areas of Practice in Vermont

Bicycle Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Providing professional legal help for victims of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal assistance for victims affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Liability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, delivering adept legal assistance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Malpractice

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Slip Injuries

Adept in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking justice for their injuries.

Newborn Damages

Delivering legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Mishaps: Focused on guiding clients of car accidents get equitable recompense for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Truck Crash

Extending experienced legal advice for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for losses.

Building Accidents

Committed to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Focused on extending specialized legal support for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Proficient in managing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Committed to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Fatality

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and experienced legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Damage

Committed to defending clients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​