FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Versailles

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has been traumatized by a dog bite injury in Versailles, Carlson Bier’s seasoned personal injury attorneys can navigate the complexities of the legal process for you. At Carlson Bier, we understand that handling such sensitive cases requires both competence and compassion. We deploy our vast experience in Illinois state law to ensure your rights are upheld thoroughly under the strict standards of statue 510 ILCS 5/16 – The Animal Control Act. Our hard-won reputation stems from an unwavering dedication to securing full compensation for physical trauma, medical expenses, lost earnings and emotional distress that dog bites often cause in victims’ lives.

Our approach leverages aggressive advocacy backed by meticulous investigation as we strive towards attaining maximum settlements or verdicts for each case assigned to us at Carlson Bier. Trusting our firm is choosing expertise reinforced with empathy; it means walking through reparative justice knowing there exists a champion fighting genuinely on your behalf against Dog Bite Injuries negligence. Choose wisely; choose Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Versailles Illinois

At the law firm of Carlson Bier, we understand that dog bites are terrifying experiences that can lead to serious physical and emotional trauma. Based in sunny Illinois, our team is composed of expert personal injury lawyers who specialize in dog bite injuries. We always aim to provide more than just legal representation but also guidance, counseling, and education for victims facing this situation.

Dog bite injuries come with various implications and severity levels. Puncture wounds may seem minor at first glance but left unattended could result in severe infections leading to prolonged pain or worse disability. Victims also oftentimes find themselves dealing with psychological distress due to the incident’s traumatic nature – developing fear towards animals or experiencing nightmares.

There are three critical points about dog bite laws in Illinois you should know:

• Strict Liability Rule: Illinois operates on a ‘strict liability’ rule regarding dog bite incidents which means that the owner is held responsible when their pet harms another individual.

• Provocation: However, if it is established that an injured party provoked the dog leading to an attack, then they might not be entitled to compensation.

• Time Limitations: Lawsuits relating to these injuries must be filed within two years from the incident’s date under Illinois’ statute of limitations.

We believe that understanding these key factors can help arm victims with knowledge — turning them into empowered individuals capable of asserting their rights. Our attorneys here at Carlson Bier are committed experts adopted over years studying and journeying through actual cases so we can best equip you during this trying time.

Investigation forms part of our initial steps – gathering evidence crucial for your claim such as medical records showcasing the extent of your injury; witness testimonials; documentation from animal control officers; pictures illustrating both wounds earned externally and internal injuries determined by X-rays or MRI results. All integral parts painting a wholer picture serving as reliable ammunition fighting in court proceedings resulting in deserved compensation on your end.

Preparation comes next where communication via consultations becomes critical in the process – not just between you and our team; but also with insurance companies involved. We exhibit relentless pursuit to reach settlements aligned with your rights as a victim, treating every negotiation with full force and highlighting your interest above all.

In cases that require going to trial – fear not. Our experienced attorneys are well seasoned in conveying compelling arguments within courtroom walls, contesting any contradiction pushed onto them relentlessly aiming for results beneficial on your end.

At Carlson Bier, we remain dedicated to partnering clients through one of their life’s most challenging encounters making it less daunting and resulting in victories they truly deserve. So why not start establishing ground today?

Remember: a blink can turn into an injury, yet days can mold into victory when spent partnering professional representation able to protect you from further torment linked with dog bite injuries. Your journey toward justice starts here at Carlson Bier.

To find out how much you could potentially receive after filing a case considering all losses encompassed by the incident (medical expenses; lost wages; emotional trauma) — click on the button below today! Partnership begins once ignorance ends so allow us to guide you towards realizing what you are entitled – claim what is justly yours now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Versailles Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Versailles

Areas of Practice in Versailles

Bicycle Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or risky conditions.

Flame Damages

Giving specialist legal advice for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Medical Misconduct

Ensuring expert legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Fault

Managing cases involving dangerous products, extending professional legal services to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Fall Injuries

Professional in handling trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their losses.

Birth Harms

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents obtain equitable remuneration for wounds and harm.

Motorcycle Accidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

18-Wheeler Incident

Offering professional legal advice for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for hurts.

Building Accidents

Concentrated on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Injuries

Expert in delivering expert legal representation for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Skilled in addressing cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog bites or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Committed to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unfair Loss

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spine Trauma

Specializing in defending patients with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440