...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Virden

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one is dealing with the aftermath of a dog bite injury, having experienced legal representation can make all the difference. The team at Carlson Bier comes equipped with an arsenal of knowledge and experience to provide unmatched expertise in this domain. We understand that such incidents are traumatic not just physically but emotionally too, adding layers to already complex personal injury cases. Our understanding extends beyond traditional prosecution strategies as we work relentlessly towards ensuring maximum compensation for physical injuries as well as emotional distress suffered by our clients. Virden residents have trusted us due in part to our deep familiarity with Illinois law pertaining specifically to dog bite injuries which positions us uniquely within protection realms unavailable elsewhere. Swift resolution coupled with comprehensive counseling sets your recovery journey onto stress-free paths and restores normalcy sooner than expected from potentially catastrophic incidents like these. Choosing Carlson Bier translates into choosing dedicated professionalism targeted for impeccable resolution outcomes on Dog Bite Injuries frontiers.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Virden Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be a traumatic and complex experience, leading to extensive medical treatments and potential psychological damage. As such, understanding your rights as a victim can significantly ease the burden of this unfortunate situation. If you or anyone you know have been bitten by a dog in Illinois, Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys are here to help.

Firstly, it’s crucial to recognize that each dog bite injury case is unique. Consequently, how Carlson Bier approaches your case will differ based on the specific evidence involved and the unique circumstances of your incident. Professionals at our firm are well versed in Illinois statutory laws regarding animal injuries and can navigate the legal approaches accordingly.

Learning about common damages sought after a dog bite may prove integral for your comprehension:

• Medical Expenses: These cover past and future medical costs related to the injury.

• Pain and Suffering: You may seek compensation if the incident has resulted in significant physical pain or emotional distress.

• Lost Wages: If the injury caused you to miss work or impaired your ability to work, recover lost earnings might be possible.

• Property Damage: In instances where personal property got damaged during the attack (e.g., eyeglasses).

Understanding liability in an Illinois dog bite case is essential too. Under ‘strict liability,’ Wisconsin’s Dog Owner Liability Statute states that regardless of knowledge about their pet’s viciousness, owners bear responsibility for injuries their dogs inflict.

Another critical aspect comes with deciding if one needs professional legal representation when dealing with such cases. Though managing some smaller claims without professional guidance might seem feasible initially – given strict time bars for filing injury lawsuits (known as ‘statutes of limitations’), rapidly increasing medical bills or underestimation of long-term impact – it proves wise consulting professionals like us at Carlson Bier who understand these dynamics best.

Having seasoned experts advocating for you ensures efficient navigation through various procedures while also achieving maximum recovery amount possible given individual case scenarios. Additionally, this allows victims to focus on their recovery without the added stress of battling insurance companies and legalities alone.

To aid in your case, preparation is key. Keeping records relating to medical treatment, reporting incidents to local animal control authorities or police promptly (helpful for evidence strengthening), and reaching out professional attorneys as soon as possible can optimally position cases for success.

At Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys, we work on a contingency basis meaning that unless we succeed in obtaining compensation for you, no legal fees are charged – demonstrating our commitment to ensuring justice gets served while keeping victims’ interests at the forefront.

Intricacies surrounding dog bite injury laws require expert interpretative skills honed over years of experience which our professionals at Carlson Bier possess. Our commitment translates into not only striving towards outperforming expectations but also warming lives touched by these unfortunate incidences through empathy-driven services. By choosing us as your guiding light in navigating through this seemingly difficult juncture in life after dog bite injuries notably enhances the potential outcome.

For a clear perspective on just how much your case is worth and how we can champion your cause towards receiving due compensation amongst other helpful insights; do click on the button below and take an easy step forward with seasoned expertise guiding you at every stage. With Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys, peace of mind becomes more than attainable – it’s inevitable!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Virden Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Virden

Areas of Practice in Virden

Cycling Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Burn Traumas

Giving specialist legal assistance for victims of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Liability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal guidance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Abuse

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Trip Mishaps

Skilled in handling trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Newborn Injuries

Extending legal support for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Incidents

Accidents: Concentrated on aiding sufferers of car accidents receive equitable settlement for injuries and losses.

Scooter Collisions

Expert in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Trucking Crash

Delivering adept legal assistance for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for hurts.

Building Site Accidents

Engaged in representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Expert in offering compassionate legal advice for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Proficient in managing cases for persons who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unfair Death

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and skilled legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Trauma

Committed to supporting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​