Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Wamac

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with Dog Bite Injuries in Wamac, the esteemed Carlson Bier law firm stands above the rest. With an unparalleled track record in personal injury cases, they bring expertise and diligent service to every client. Their exceptional success rate testifies not only to their comprehensive knowledge of Illinois statutes but also to their unwavering commitment towards achieving justice for victims of dog bite injuries. Navigating through a challenging event such as this calls for legal representation that can transform adversity into resolution–and Carlson Bier does just that. They understand how traumatic a dog bite incident can be; thus, they thrive on ensuring each case is handled sensitively and strategically. Regardless of your location or extent of grievance, you deserve world-class assistance which honors your need for personalized attention while accessing nuanced state-specific laws related to dog-bite injuries: choose Carlson Bier where insight meets compassion when you most need it.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Wamac Illinois

Dog bite injuries, although unforeseen, present real and significant impacts on the individuals affected physically and emotionally. The Carlson Bier law firm specialized in personal injury has extensive experience providing robust legal representation for victims of dog bites across Illinois. Our team comprehensively understands the state’s laws surrounding these incidents to deliver personalized aid that meets individual expectations.

Such scenarios typically stem from owners failing to contain their pets adequately, which poses a risk to public safety resulting in serious harm or trauma. Dog bite injuries vary greatly but could involve puncture wounds, sprains or fractures from falls during an attack, infections from a wound left untreated, psychological trauma especially in children and facial scarring.

In 510 ILCS 5/2.18(a) compliance of the Illinois Animal Control Act (510 ILCS 5), it is incumbent upon every dog owner to prevent dog attacks or injuries inflicted by their pets unto other people. This accountability provides grounds for aggrieved parties seeking justice and compensation through litigation spearheaded by qualified attorneys such as our competent team at Carlson Bier.

The Carlson Bier law firm skillfully navigates clients through critical steps after a dog bite occurrence including;

1. Seeking medical attention immediately: Post-incident care strongly influences long term recovery processes along with establishing credible documentation for possible litigation.

2. Reporting the incident: Notify your local police department or animal control center promptly providing necessary information about the incident.

3.Maintaining records: Documenting comprehensive information about the event e.g., photographs of your injury, clothing worn during the incident enhances our ability to substantiate your claim correctly.

4.Procuring witness accounts: Those who attended you after occurrence corroborate evidence essential when pursuing fair compensation.

Our seasoned attorneys understand that every situation is distinctive; thus they are dedicated to each case’s unique aspects no matter how minor they may seem initially.Lightly scratched skin surfaces might escalate into severe infections unexpectedly needing extensive costly medical care and long-term treatment interventions.

The Carlson Bier law firm persistently works to secure justice and maximum possible injury compensation for our clients in adherence with Illinois legislation. This focused commitment aims at offsetting the incurred medical costs, lost wages during recovery time, aiding with rehabilitation needs such as counseling or physical therapy induced by an event avoidable if the pet owner observed responsible ownership policies. Our priority is a justified resolution of your grievances while relieving you of unnecessary stresses brought about by a traumatic experience undeservedly suffered due to unauthorized negligence.

Victims are protected under Illinois’s dog bite statute outwardly favoring those injured parties while holding errant owners liable for any unprovoked attacks resulting in injuries. The underlying objective seeks to reduce such occurrences impacting community well-being significantly. Expert legal representation by competent attorneys heightens successful case outcome chances ensuring affected individuals get fair compensation from sustained losses dutifully dispensed according to existing state laws.

The Carlson Bier personal injury attorney group stands ready to assist should someone close encounter unfortunate circumstances through a dog bite incident wherever one may be domiciled across Illinois . Engaging us ensures personalized attention accorded towards pursuing justice in an utterly professional manner because we genuinely care about each person reaching out seeking assistance.

We encourage you to click on the button below, but before doing that bear in mind we uphold exceptionally high work standards aligning our service provision packages with stipulated industry codes strictly governed by regulatory authorities including advertising restrictions where applicable according to 225 ILCS 410/3E-3(a) concerning falsely implying locations not physically present.

Our team looks eagerly forward to hearing from you soon as part of formulating how best Carlson Bier can most effectively aid navigating legislations presenting impenetrable labyrinths for numerous aggravated citizens entitled rightfully towards necessary restitution measures.

Your valid claims could be worth much more than initially anticipated! We attentively invite you now so together, let’s ascertain what your dog bite injury case is worth. Click the button below to learn more!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wamac Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Wamac

Areas of Practice in Wamac

Bike Accidents

Focused on legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Offering professional legal advice for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Medical Negligence

Providing experienced legal services for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal services to clients affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Neglect

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Slip Injuries

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking justice for their losses.

Infant Wounds

Offering legal guidance for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Accidents

Incidents: Devoted to supporting individuals of car accidents gain just payout for harms and harm.

Motorbike Crashes

Committed to providing legal support for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Truck Crash

Extending adept legal services for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Engaged in defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cerebral Injuries

Committed to extending professional legal representation for patients suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Harms

Skilled in managing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Death

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and skilled legal services to ensure fairness.

Spine Damage

Focused on advocating for patients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer