Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Wamac

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Being a pedestrian shouldn’t equate to danger, yet the sad reality is that accidents do occur. In Wamac and across Illinois, individuals often suffer grave injuries due to negligent drivers. At Carlson Bier, we have committed our practice to safeguard these victims’ rights. Our experienced team of Pedestrian Accident attorneys understand the complexities surrounding these cases and diligently work for their clients, fighting tirelessly until justice is served. With an impressive track record in personal injury law spanning several years throughout Illinois, selecting us means pairing with tenacious advocates who have your best interest at heart.

Navigating personal injury claims can be tricky; hence you need professional support from trusted lawyers like those at Carlson Bier. We are recognized for innovative solutions shaped by extensive knowledge of Illinois traffic laws and awareness of local courtroom intricacies. Empathetic yet firm when needed, we strive to make this journey less daunting while pushing towards optimized settlements or verdicts.

If you’re seeking relentless representation after a devastating Pedestrian Accident in Wamac—we invite you: choose excellence—choose Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Wamac Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the aftermath of a pedestrian accident can be chaotic and distressing. As experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our aim is to support victims by providing them with robust legal representation while also offering compassionate guidance through this tumultuous period of their lives.

Pedestrian accidents occur when someone walking along or crossing the road is hit by a vehicle. The impact can result in severe injuries that lead to enormous medical expenses, loss of wages due to inability to work and other economic losses such as rehabilitation costs. It could also lead to non-economic damages like pain and suffering or loss of enjoyment in life due to disability caused by the accident. Understanding your rights as a victim plays a critical role in ensuring you receive the full compensation due to you under state law.

• Pedestrians have the right-of-way: In many instances where pedestrian-involved accidents occur, it’s noted that pedestrians usually have the right of way. Regardless if they were at an intersection or not, drivers are obligated by law to let pedestrians pass first.

• Driver Negligence: Often these accidents happen because drivers fail to observe basic traffic rules like stopping for red lights or stop signs, exceeding speed limits, distracted driving among others.

• Comparative Fault Rule: Illinois operates on what’s called a “comparative negligence” rule which means even if you were partly responsible for your accident; you may still recover damages from any other party who was more at fault than you were.

• Statute of Limitations: Illinois statute sets a time limit within which an injured pedestrian must file their lawsuit against those believed negligent (two years from when the injury occurred).

With Carlson Bier standing beside you every step of your journey post-accident, we ensure that all complex laws relating to pedestrian accidents are simplified for easy comprehension. Our dedicated team works relentlessly building strong cases addressing each specific aspect unique to your situation.

At our firm, we understand that dealing with insurance companies can be intimidating. This is why we effectively negotiate on your behalf, leaving no stone unturned to ensure you receive the compensation you deserve. Whether it’s dealing with reluctant insurance companies or pursuing a lawsuit, Carlson Bier does all it takes to get justice for our clients.

We’re thorough in our preparation for each case; reaching out to relevant witnesses, reviewing medical records meticulously and consulting accident reconstruction experts if need be; thereby guaranteeing every possible detail is covered explicitly and ensuring maximum benefits are secured.

Our dedicated team holds vast experience aiding clients through the complex procedures of filing lawsuits against errant drivers liable for pedestrian accidents. We tirelessly strive towards serving the interests of those injured due to the negligence or recklessness of others.

As one of Illinois’ leading law firms specializing in personal injury litigation, we’ve helped numerous pedestrians secure their rightful compensation and would be honored to represent you in your fight for justice. At Carlson Bier, we believe every person deserves a fair chance at seeking redressal following an unfortunate incident involving pedestrian accidents.

Taking that crucial first step may seem overwhelming after an accident. However, remember time is critical when lodging a claim or lawsuit post-accident as statutory limits apply. Therefore know this: While you focus on recovery from physical and emotional distress resulting from your accident – legal matters surrounding your claim shouldn’t add more stress onto you.

If guided expert help by professionals who genuinely care about securing your interest appeals to you then click on the button below now. Let’s talk about how much your case might be worth so that together, we can start taking progressive steps towards reclaiming control over the situation life presented unexpectedly at you!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wamac Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Wamac

Areas of Practice in Wamac

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Burn Injuries

Extending professional legal advice for individuals of major burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Hospital Negligence

Ensuring professional legal assistance for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Obligation

Managing cases involving dangerous products, providing professional legal support to individuals affected by harmful products.

Elder Abuse

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Slip Injuries

Adept in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Childbirth Wounds

Delivering legal help for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Accidents: Concentrated on helping sufferers of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Committed to providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Truck Incident

Delivering professional legal support for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for losses.

Building Mishaps

Engaged in assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cerebral Injuries

Focused on ensuring compassionate legal assistance for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Expertise in tackling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Undeserved Fatality

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and expert legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Damage

Specializing in advocating for persons with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer