...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Wapella

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to seeking justice for dog bite injuries, the unwavering support of a dedicated lawyer can make all the difference. Carlson Bier is your go-to law firm in Illinois for exceptional representation. Our experienced attorneys specialize in personal injury law and are particularly skilled at handling complex dog bite cases with utmost precision and efficiency. We comprehend how traumatic such incidents could be and focus on advocating aggressively for our clients’ rights, ensuring they receive appropriate compensation for physical or emotional trauma caused due to negligent pet owners. At Carlson Bier, we’re committed not only to serving you as professionals but also empathizing with what you might be going through as individuals who deserve nothing short of fair treatment. Even though Wapella is outside our immediate jurisdiction, we assure that this isn’t an issue regarding your access to impeccable legal service; because where there’s need of justice due to such misfortunes, we extend our expert advice and assistance without hesitation or boundations pertaining geographic proximities when considering Illinois State Law.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Wapella Illinois

Dog bite injuries, besides being exceptionally frightening, can be seriously damaging. Reputable for providing patrons with thorough and pertinent information, our law firm Carlson Bier specializes in personal injury cases, particularly dog bite injuries based on Illinois statutes.

Knowing your legal rights after suffering a dog bite is crucial. In Illinois, the responsibility for a dog attack usually falls upon the canine’s owner or caretaker unless they can confirm that you provoked the animal or were trespassing on their property when the incident occurred. If this isn’t evident, then victims do not need to provide proof of negligence but only demonstrate possession by the defender at injury time.

Dog bites often inflict temporary or permanent physical harm. Even minor harms such as punctures and lacerations require medical attention to prevent further issues like infections and diseases. If left untreated, these conditions could escalate into life-threatening ones such as Cellulitis or Capnocytophaga infection.

The psychological effects should also not be underestimated – Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and fear of animals can significantly affect normal living following a traumatic encounter with an aggressive dog.

Achieving compensation has several aspects to consider:

•   Medical Expenses: These include visits to ER, vaccination shots like Tetanus and Rabies if necessary, hospitalization costs, cost of future medical treatments if complications arise from the initial injuries.

•    Lost wages: This represents an entire income loss during recovery time which would result in financial distress.

•    Pain & Suffering: There is no fixed scale deciding how much one should get compensated for pain inflicted mentally/emotionally/physically due stress caused by injury trauma.

•    Legal fees and court costs: Victims should not carry burdensome monetary losses while seeking justice; hence these expenditures may be claimable depending on various factors linked to case specifics.

Choosing an adept attorney specializing in personal injury laws can turn out to be beneficial for victims choosing litigation routes. Lawyers at Carlson Bier are experts in these cases and can meticulously collect evidence, investigate circumstances, estimate justifiable compensation amounts and artfully negotiate with opponent parties.

By aligning with us, victims gain benefit from our vast experience of representing varied dog bite cases where we have secured satisfactory outcomes seeking justice for our clients. Our efficacious strategies, result-driven approach has earned us multiple accolades as excellence-carriers in personal injury law across Illinois.

Crucially, our free consultation service will enable individuals to initially evaluate their case with an expert attorney without any obligation. This not only creates a trusted relationship environment but also helps the victim understand the legal processes involved ahead of commencing court filings.

Legislation concerning dog bites may alter from state to state which complicates understanding essential factors affecting your situation. Hence entrusting professionals having profound knowledge sobre this area eases overcoming such perplexities and ensures required legal standards are met promptly while catering for victim rights – that’s what we assure at the Carlson Bier Law Firm.

Don’t let the complex process impede your pursuit of justified compensation – every dollar counts when it comes to dealing with trauma or managing finances after a dog attack incident. The compassionate team at Carlson Bier is ready to guide you through this complicated journey towards obtaining necessary restitution.

Before drawing closure on tackling Dog bite injuries’ topic content, recognitions need focusing upon importance around offering immediate medical attention and prompt pursuits toward legal aid if faced by such unfortunate situations; needless to emphasize that timely actions would multiply success rates seeking deserved compensations against perpetrators causing pain/suffering unjustly.

Curious about evaluating your individual case? Click on the button below to commence justice-seeking endeavors contributing positively towards recovering peace stolen by unwanted occurrences: ascertain how much worth does your particular case bears via interacting with one of Carlson Bier’s competent attorneys today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wapella Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Wapella

Areas of Practice in Wapella

Cycling Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Providing adept legal advice for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Medical Malpractice

Delivering experienced legal assistance for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Accountability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, extending adept legal support to customers affected by defective items.

Elder Neglect

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Stumble Accidents

Professional in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking redress for their damages.

Childbirth Damages

Supplying legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Incidents

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting sufferers of car accidents gain reasonable payout for damages and impairment.

Motorbike Accidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Truck Crash

Providing adept legal advice for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for injuries.

Building Crashes

Concentrated on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Cognitive Injuries

Expert in delivering expert legal services for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Wounds

Adept at managing cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unfair Demise

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and expert legal assistance to ensure redress.

Neural Injury

Committed to assisting patients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer