...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Warren

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dog bite injuries occur in Warren, faced with complex legal procedures and uncertain outcomes, it is necessary to have a skilled advocate by your side. That’s where Carlson Bier expert advice comes into play. As leading professionals in the personal injury realm across Illinois, we bring forward years of experience handling such cases successfully. Renowned for our deep expertise on dog bite laws, we serve as rigorous representation equipped with an aggressive approach ensuring fair compensation for victims’ pain and anguish. Whether you were bit during a stroll or at someone else’s property in Warren , Carlson Bier will stand strong against insurance companies that aim to minimize your claim process recovery amount downplaying injury severity . Our dedication delivers deserved justice through precise articulation and assertive negotiation strategies while showing empathy towards clients facing trauma post dog bites incidents . Trusting Carlson Bier’s competent team ensures access to personalized counsel essential when pursuing rightful reparation following disgraceful canine attacks.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Warren Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in representing victims of personal injury cases such as dog bite injuries. As an established law firm based in Illinois, our focus is not only to secure justice but also to educate the public about the substantial implications and laws surrounding dog bite incidents. We firmly believe that awareness is the first step towards prevention, and our goal is to provide you with detailed educational content regarding this issue.

Dog bites can result in severe physical harm or emotional trauma and often lead to expensive medical treatments. Understanding certain key aspects of a dog bite injury claim can significantly affect the outcome of your case:

– Establishing Liability: The owner of a pet is usually held responsible for their pet’s action under Illinois state law, including any injuries caused by their pets.

– Proving Negligence: In some cases, it may be necessary for the injured party to prove negligence on part of the pet owner leading to the incident.

– Time Limitation (Statute Of Limitations): An injured party generally has two years from the date of injury to file a lawsuit against a negligent party involved in a dog attack.

Knowledge and understanding remain essential when considering filing claims for recovery after sustaining injuries from dog bites. On becoming victims, individuals often succumb under pressure due to lack of information regarding legal proceedings and critical legal fundamentals specifically tailored for incidents like these.

Carlson Bier prides itself on possessing comprehensive expertise adding immense value through easily understandable yet insightful content targeted at aiding prospective clients during such trying times. We elucidate complex terms simplifying all stages involved – starting from filing an initial claim until receiving rightful compensation lifting off associated stress experienced by injured parties.

We are well aware that each case comes with its own unique complexities requiring carefully studied strategies making sure no stone is left unturned while seeking just outcomes. Our adept team tirelessly works behind-the-scenes ensuring best possible representation leveraging extensive local know-how along with highly refined negotiation skills delivering unparalleled results.

Being result-oriented professionals, we recognize the value of effective communication and transparency keeping clients updated throughout every step. At Carlson Bier, you are never alone in your pursuit of justice; personal injury cases come bearing heavy emotional and financial challenges which is why our firm goes above and beyond to brew winning strategies backed by reliable information tailored for your specific circumstances.

In conclusion, visit our website and explore dynamic resources directly reflecting our commitment towards pursuing justice. We believe sharing knowledge about dog bite injuries pertaining to Illinois can help manage this unnecessary epidemic more effectively while potentially saving potential victims from physical pain or turmoil.

When faced with a personal injury lawsuit for a dog-bite injury, it’s crucial to have expert attorneys like those at Carlson Bier working on your behalf ensuring full protection under Illinois law that shoulders vast experience handling similar claims catering impeccable assistance during disruptive incidents.

Our mission extends well beyond courtroom walls – shaping a safer future imparting instrumental education regarding legal landscape surrounding issues these representing a vital part of same strategy. Feel free to use rich insights presented here as stepping stones leading toward the right direction where understanding meets action forging robust legal defences capable of withstanding any test brought upon by adversities endured after suffering from painful dog bites.

Are you interested to find out what your case is worth? Click the button below and get access to experienced lawyers ready to dedicate their efforts towards obtaining requisite restitution cultivating path leading towards compensation deserved addressing various aspects affected due past dog bite incident including medical expenses, lost wages along with pain suffered! Begin journey today armed valuable insight drawn out by seasoned experts from Carlson Bier awaiting eagerly assisting!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Warren Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Warren

Areas of Practice in Warren

Cycling Incidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Burns

Giving professional legal support for people of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Ensuring dedicated legal support for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Liability

Managing cases involving faulty products, supplying expert legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking justice for their damages.

Infant Injuries

Supplying legal support for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Dedicated to helping clients of car accidents gain fair settlement for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Specializing in providing legal support for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Big Rig Crash

Extending adept legal representation for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for damages.

Building Site Collisions

Concentrated on defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cognitive Injuries

Committed to offering dedicated legal representation for clients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Adept at dealing with cases for people who have suffered damages from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Focused on representing persons with backbone trauma, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​