FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Warren

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a spinal cord injury, your path may be fraught with uncertainty and challenges. At Carlson Bier, we provide expert legal support for victims suffering from these devastating injuries. Our seasoned attorneys are profoundly knowledgeable and experienced in the complexities and intricacies associated with spinal cord litigation procedures in Warren.

We prioritize the welfare of our clients while striving to obtain maximum compensation for their pain, suffering, medical expenses, loss of income along with other relevant costs related to their misfortunes. Drawing on our firm’s exemplary record in this distinctive area of law gives us an unrivaled ability to navigate these intricate cases assuring fair recompense.

Allowing you time and space to concentrate on healing and personal recovery is integral as we earnestly champion your rights within the complicated realms of insurance settlements or courtroom advocacy. Engaging Carlson Bier ensures compassionate counsel coupled with unparalleled dedication towards securing justice firmly anchored on a brilliant understanding of Warren’s judicial protocols surrounding spinal cord injuries.

Enjoin yourself today into purposeful partnership that prizes empowerment above all else – entrust your case at Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Warren Illinois

As a renowned law firm across Illinois, Carlson Bier commands specialization in personal injury law with an exceptional focus on Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI). SCIs are among the most serious and life-changing injuries that individuals can suffer; they often result from accidents, falls or acts of violence. The pejorative impact these have on quality of life, burdening victims both physically and financially is profound.

Miller Fallingsworth, one of our seasoned injury attorneys at Carlson Bier emphasizes that individuals suffering from SCI should understand the complexity and severity of these injuries to fully comprehend their legal rights. Typically, the symptoms of spinal cord injuries may not surface immediately following an accident but gradually deteriorate over time into debilitating conditions. These might include numbing or tingling sensation, loss of motor function, respiratory issues or even complete paralysis.

The severity and extent of physical damage largely depends upon where along the spine the injury occurred. For instance:

– An injury to cervical spinal cord could lead to quadriplegia — lack of control over both upper and lower body movements.

– Thoracic spinal cord injuries may afect trunk stability resulting in paraplegia – paralysis from waist down.

– Lumbar or Sacral spinal cord damages affect leg movements and might require walking aids for mobility.

SCIs not only drastically alter lives physically but entail skyrocketing medical costs for treatments such as multiple surgeries, physical therapy, pain management measures among others — posing significant financial strains onto victims and families alike.

A proficient attorney at Carlson Bier like Miller can make all the difference in tackling complex legislation associated with Spinal Cord Injuries while ensuring clients are awarded maximum compensation covering medical costs, lost wages due to impaired earning capacity as well as non-monetary aspects e.g., emotional distress implicated by loss-of-enjoyment-of-life in light of altered lifestyle post-accident.

It’s important for victims to be mindful that Illinois statute has specific deadlines named ‘Statute of Limitations’ for filing personal injury claims which generally dial down to two years, commencing from accident date. Prolonging could result in the court declining your case outright — hence emphasizing contacting a knowledgeable attorney like Miller promptly following an incident.

Having fought numerous such battles in Illinois courts, our lawyers at Carlson Bier fully comprehend the future difficulties and implications SCI victims face – helping guide through every step of the process with unrivaled expertise drawn from years of experience regarding spinal cord injuries and the accompanying compensation laws. Empowering victims with information about their case, communicating clearly and ensuring clients remain at forefront throughout is well-imbibed in our practice culture.

We stand committed to leverage our profound intricacy-awareness to aid clients navigate analyses medical reports, insurance negotiations, evaluate full extent of damages and suggest most suitable legal options available towards maximum feasible remedies.

If you or someone you know has sustained a debilitating spinal cord injury due to someone else’s negligence, allow us at Carlson Bier law firm to shoulder some burden off you by taking care of all legal aspects related to your claim while providing compassionate support during this stressful period. We make it a point that no victim should have undue stress about where next month’s rent or pending medical bills will come from when fighting bigger battles with their health.

Time is absolutely critical following accidents causing Spinal Cord Injuries for initiating lawsuit procedures as specific rules & deadlines exist under Illinois statute; no victim should be denied justice due to unawareness — seeking legal counsel gives best chance at receiving rightful compensation conveniently.

Dealing with SCI is challenging enough on its own without considering the added worries associated. Might we help alleviate these via practical legal solutions? Let’s ascertain what might be potentially achievable on the path ahead if we join forces on this journey! Find out how much your case could be worth – Click on this button below and let us get started right away!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Warren Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Warren

Areas of Practice in Warren

Cycling Accidents

Proficient in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Burns

Supplying expert legal assistance for people of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal support for victims affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Responsibility

Handling cases involving defective products, supplying specialist legal guidance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Slip Occurrences

Skilled in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking compensation for their damages.

Newborn Damages

Offering legal help for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Collisions: Committed to aiding clients of car accidents receive reasonable compensation for injuries and losses.

Bike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Big Rig Accident

Offering expert legal assistance for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for harms.

Worksite Collisions

Concentrated on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Brain Traumas

Focused on ensuring compassionate legal advice for patients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Proficient in managing cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Passing

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and experienced legal services to ensure fairness.

Backbone Impairment

Expert in assisting victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​