...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Warrensburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a dog bite injury, turning to Carlson Bier is an optimal choice for legal representation in Warrensburg. Backed by extensive experience and comprehensive knowledge in personal injury law, we at Carlson Bier deeply understand how traumatizing such incidents can be. We handle each case with utmost diligence and empathy, guiding you through the complex laws related to dog bite injuries in Illinois. With a well-earned reputation for achieving favorable verdicts and settlements for our clients, we firmly strive to recuperate maximum compensation possible on your behalf – covering medical expenses, pain & suffering among others. Our commitment goes far beyond client representation; it echoes into creating safer communities by advocating for accountability of pet owners’ negligence that leads to painful infringements upon others’ rights. Choosing Carlson Bier epitomizes choosing unwavering dedication derived from tireless pursuit of justice specifically tailored towards victims of dog bite injuries seamlessly paired with top-class professionalism and unmatched expertise.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Warrensburg Illinois

At the law firm of Carlson Bier, we are staunch defenders of personal injury victims across Illinois. With a sterling reputation and years of professional experience, our team effectively handles an array of cases including that involving dog bite injuries. A dog bite can result in serious damage both physically and emotionally – adversely affecting your life in countless ways. It is vital to comprehend your rights and legal options following such distressing incidents.

The scope and impact of dog bite injuries can be extensive. On one hand, there might be physical damages – significant tissue loss, scarring or disfigurement, lacerations, puncture wounds, fractured bones and sprains, infection risks or even potential exposure to rabies. Likewise on the emotional side- trauma could develop into anxiety disorders or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). There may also be financial implications: substantial medical bills for treatment; lost wages due to time spent away from work; costs related to psychological counselling becomes inevitable as well.

Major key points for litigating a successful claim include:

•Establishing liable party: According to Illinois’ animal control law statutes, the owner is almost always held responsible for their pet’s actions.

•Proving negligence: The injured individual must demonstrate that the pet owner failed in their responsibility towards restraining/control their dog.

•Damages incurred should be proven: Concrete evidence like photos of injuries/ property damaged along with relevant medical records can substantiate this aspect.

Knowing these steps will empower you but enlisting legal assistance drastically enhances success chances. That’s where we step in! Our attorneys at Carlson Bier are experienced fighters who know every nuance about how insurance companies think & operate during these claims negotiations process.

We make it our mission here at Carlson Bier to fight relentlessly against insurance company tactics while guiding each client through this complex system ensuring they receive just compensation they’re entitled too. We understand that dealing with aftermaths impacts more than just your health—it affects life quality too.

Pursuing legal action might seem a daunting prospect, but the experienced team at Carlson Bier is here to make this journey as painless and fruitful as possible. We understand the intricacies of personal injury law like no other, particularly when it comes down to dog bite cases.

Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing a tireless advocate who will be at your side every step along the way – from collecting incontrovertible evidence that supports your case to relentless negotiation with insurance companies for rightful compensation. Our seasoned attorneys have a stellar track record of securing substantial settlements for clients suffering from accident injuries caused by others’ carelessness or negligence.

Remember, time is crucial in such instances- don’t delay getting assistance you desperately need! Potential limitations periods under Illinois Law could bar claims if not acted upon promptly so it’s recommended to consult an attorney soon after incidence occurs ensuring best chances for just compensation.

One final point worth noting is our focus on recovery—that’s why we strictly follow contingency fee setup—you owe us nothing unless we succeed in procuring fair compensation deserving rightfully established under agreement defined parameters.

So if you’re one among those who’ve experienced trauma due to a dog bite incident & considering next steps-legally? Wondering what amount your claim might possibly fetch out in terms of damages compensations? Take control of your situation by clicking the button below and find out how much may potentially be recoverable considering specific circumstances pertaining to your individual case!

Following this could just prove instrumental tipping point turning around seemingly adverse aftermaths prospects towards ultimately culminating into successful conclusion earning you peace of mind plus much-needed relief assuaging burdensome financial consequences post tragic ordeal undergone during such traumatic episodes! Click right away – let us help navigate through these times together starting now onwards.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Warrensburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Warrensburg

Areas of Practice in Warrensburg

Cycling Incidents

Expert in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Burn Damages

Giving adept legal services for patients of serious burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Medical Misconduct

Offering dedicated legal representation for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Obligation

Managing cases involving problematic products, offering professional legal services to victims affected by defective items.

Geriatric Neglect

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Trip Injuries

Skilled in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking justice for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Extending legal help for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Accidents: Committed to assisting victims of car accidents get reasonable recompense for damages and impairment.

Motorbike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Semi Crash

Ensuring professional legal support for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for injuries.

Building Mishaps

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Neurological Injuries

Specializing in delivering expert legal services for persons suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Skilled in handling cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Fatality

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and skilled legal services to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Specializing in supporting patients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​