...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Wasco

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or your loved one suffer dog bite injuries in Wasco, turning to Carlson Bier can make all the difference. Our dedicated team of personal injury lawyers specializes in dog bite cases, providing valuable legal advice and aggressive representation. Drawing on deep knowledge of Illinois law governing such incidents, we fight relentlessly for the rights and interests of victims. We believe every victim deserves just compensation for their physical trauma as well as emotional distress caused by a dog attack. What sets Carlson Bier apart is our personalized approach that focuses on understanding each client’s unique situation thoroughly before crafting an effective legal strategy. We understand how debilitating these injuries are; hence our commitment goes beyond achieving financial remedy – it extends to ensuring medical recovery while offering comprehensive support throughout the legal process.

Choose us at Carlson Bier because we specialize in overcoming complex facets involving insurance companies and navigating complicated liability laws related to animal bites—trust in seasoned lawyers who commit unwaveringly toward securing justice for victims of Dog Bite Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Wasco Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our expertise doesn’t end at personal injury scenarios; we’re also equipped to handle unique cases such as dog bite injuries. As an established law firm in Illinois, we provide dependable legal assistance tailored specifically for victims suffering from the traumatic effects of these incidents.

Understanding that each case is different, one may wonder what a typical dog bite injury lawsuit entails. Often seen as minor issues by many unaware individuals, this situation’s gravity begins with recognizing the ongoing physical and emotional trauma. This understanding alone can entirely change how you approach subsequent stages of your pursuit for justice.

Experience shows several key factors typically influence the outcome of a dog bite case:

– Clear proof that it was indeed the defendant’s pet involved in the incident

– Evidence suggesting that there were no provoking actions from your end

– Documentation or testimonies to support that you had lawful presence on the property during the event.

One should efficiently present these points in court to establish a strong stand against the offender.

Even though most people dismiss dog bites as minor injuries, these occurrences leave deeper scars than meet the eye. Aside from causing visible physical damage – ranging from minor nips to severe wounds – they could lead to significant health complications if not promptly addressed. The first step towards placing an effectual claim involves establishing clear substantial medical evidence related to your injuries and associated expenses.

A critical aspect here is tracing potential permanent repercussions like stunted mobility or psychological distress alongside those directly visible attributions like cuts or bruising. At Carlson Bier, we house professionals skilled at comprehensively addressing all such aspects in-court so no detail escapes attention when fighting for rightful reparations.

Recognizing how deeply ingrained societal perception around ‘dog-love’ is, it becomes equally important that any legal claims surrounding a loved pet don’t fall prey to prejudiced attitudes prevalent outside courtroom walls either. Our tenacious team ensures you get treated rightfully as an aggrieved victim rather than an aggressor, aware that the law doesn’t stand lightly on animal cruelty.

While representing your case in court, we work diligently to establish that the pet owner’s negligence was directly responsible for the incident. By employing specific legal manoeuvres tailored around Illinois’ Animal Control Act and One Bite Rule, back by our strategic evidence representation, we then aim to better the compensation claim prospects for you—every tiny effort helping tilt courtroom scales in favor of the victim.

We also ascertain that any misperception about comparative negligence (which implies that because of your actions/contributions partially towards the accident, it might reduce your compensation) is adequately clarified. We ensure through proper defense mechanisms this Illinois-exclusive rule doesn’t diminish deserved settlement amount – let alone absolve culprits from their liability.

Each dog bite injury case carries its unique intricacies; however basic or complex they may be. Owing to countless such cases fought (and won!) over years spanning our practice history at Carlson Bier—an all-encompassing understanding reflects within our personalized approach towards handling each client’s demand with utmost dedication.’

Our clients are an integral part of our journey as we strive to offer them professional yet compassionate assistance while navigating deeply personal processes where success reigns supreme only when justice seizes victory.

Wondering how much compensations could potentially await at this journey’s end? Click on the button below! A world beyond mere numbers – one where peace and satisfaction reign begins here at Carlson Bier. Join us in reclaiming what rightfully belongs to you: dignity, security, and a rightful settlement for those undoubtedly grueling times after an unfortunate event like a dog bite injury. Let us help you find out how much your case is worth today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wasco Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Wasco

Areas of Practice in Wasco

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Extending professional legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Clinical Negligence

Offering experienced legal support for victims affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Accountability

Handling cases involving faulty products, providing expert legal support to consumers affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Neglect

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Fall Injuries

Expert in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking redress for their harm.

Neonatal Wounds

Supplying legal assistance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Mishaps: Dedicated to aiding clients of car accidents receive equitable remuneration for injuries and impairment.

Motorcycle Incidents

Committed to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Semi Incident

Delivering specialist legal representation for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for hurts.

Construction Site Incidents

Engaged in assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Damages

Dedicated to extending dedicated legal representation for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Damages

Expertise in handling cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and experienced legal services to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Injury

Specializing in assisting individuals with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​