FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Washington Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Dog bites can have dire and extensive consequences that extend beyond the physical harm. If you are a victim of such an unfortunate event in Washington Park, it’s vital to work with experienced attorneys who understand personal injury law intricacies like Carlson Bier. Our Illinois-based team guarantees adept representation, committed to secure fair compensation while focusing on your recovery process. Specializing in dog bite injuries, we grasp the trauma clients endure and offer compassionate yet relentless advocacy for your rights under state laws against negligent pet owners. We meticulously evaluate every case detail to build a compelling argument towards ensuring that all medical expenses, pain & suffering or loss of earnings resulting from the incident are duly compensated. Over decades practicing personal injury law across diverse jurisdictions including Washington Park area cases, Cook County Courts recognize Carlson Bier as respected advocates for their unwavering commitment to justice pursuit for dog bite victims. Choose us today because when it comes down to results-oriented legal assistance involving dog bite injuries–we’re unmatched!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Washington Park Illinois

In the realm of personal injury law, Carlson Bier has solidified its position as a trusted provider of legal aid in Illinois. Over the years, we have served countless clients who suffered hardships due to others’ negligence. As specialists serving Illinois residents, one particular area where our expertise shines through is handling cases related to Dog Bite Injuries.

Dog bites can lead to serious injuries and prolonged trauma—a predicament no person should have to wrestle with alone. That’s where our seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier come in: guiding victims every step of the way while navigating nuanced state laws that govern dog bite incidents. Whether it was a distressing encounter with an aggressive neighborhood pet or an unexpected assault from an escaping hound, our team is fully equipped to handle your unique circumstances.

It is essential for dog bite victims in Illinois to understand crucial components surrounding these types of injury cases:

• Victim Rights: Illinois law extends certain rights to individuals bitten by dogs—making it mandatory for offending owners—who failed in preventing their dogs’ aggressive behaviors—to bear associated medical costs.

• Legal Time Limits: Pursue your case promptly! Illinois enforces a strict statute of limitations regarding when you can file a lawsuit following a dog bite incident.

• Comparative Negligence Rule: In scenarios where victims contributed partly towards causing their injuries—for instance provoking the animal—the amount compensated might be reduced subjectively.

Our network extends across all towns and cities within Illinois’s jurisdictional boundaries—offering unrelenting support as you seek justice after falling prey to canine-induced harm—while making sure we respect state regulations about not impliedly locating ourselves within specific city limits without owning physical offices there.

At Carlson Bier, we are steadfast about ensuring adequate compensation that mirrors each client’s pain, suffering, lost wages among others coupled with future predictive losses such as rehabilitation needs or reduced earning abilities. We believe every battle becomes half won once clients receive expansive information about their rights, potential compensation amounts, and the legal path that lies ahead—a philosophy we strictly adhere to in our handling of personal injury cases.

Our team comprises skilled attorneys profoundly familiar with each intricacy associated with dog bite injuries. They are adept at showcasing evidence demonstrating another party’s negligence effectively—an essential aspect of proving liability which plays a foundational role in propelling your chances of securing settlements rightfully deserved.

We also provide guidance regarding interactions with insurance companies—entities known for trying to minimize claims or even dismiss them outright. With Carlson Bier by your side, you can navigate these negotiations confidently knowing that professionals who prioritize your best interests are on the case.

Involving an experienced attorney immediately after a dog bite incident greatly influences the overall outcome of your claims process towards favorability. As such, don’t let valuable time slip away and engage us right away so we have ample opportunity to gather indispensable evidence while it is fresh and readily available.

Our primary goal is offering you comprehensive understanding about the steps involved when pursuing Dog Bite Injury claims paired concurrently with offering top-tier representation should you need it—in order to protect against undue losses resulting from others’ irresponsible actions.

The next step? Find out what your case could be worth. Don’t settle for urgent medical care’s hefty bills without exploring every possible avenue towards adequate financial recovery led by committed law experts versed in Illinois’s specific personal injury codes. Even if you’re unsure whether proceeding legally is worthwhile, our team at Carlson Bier can provide detailed analyses pertaining to potential outcomes based on various scenarios—all designed exclusively around alleviating any lingering uncertainties.

So click the button below—empower yourself today by joining forces with Carlson Bier’s approachable lawyers determinedly steering Illinois residents through tumultuous personal injury terrains—in particular specializing in Dog Bite Injuries—with demonstrable excellence and well-practiced proficiency! Browse our site further, delve into enlightening testimonials from satisfied clientele—we are excited to take your case’s reins while doing everything possible in transforming a distressful plight into an opportunity for desired closure and compensation.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Washington Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Washington Park

Areas of Practice in Washington Park

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Flame Burns

Extending specialist legal help for patients of major burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Ensuring expert legal support for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal help to victims affected by faulty goods.

Elder Abuse

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Tumble Accidents

Professional in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking recovery for their losses.

Neonatal Wounds

Providing legal support for families affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Accidents: Concentrated on aiding individuals of car accidents receive reasonable settlement for wounds and harm.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Truck Crash

Ensuring professional legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for losses.

Construction Site Mishaps

Engaged in advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Impairments

Dedicated to delivering dedicated legal services for individuals suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in managing cases for clients who have suffered damages from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and experienced legal support to ensure restitution.

Neural Harm

Specializing in supporting victims with vertebral damage, offering professional legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440