...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Wataga

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of a dog bite injury can be challenging and harrowing, no matter where you’re located. It’s crucial to have an experienced team by your side – Carlson Bier epitomizes just that. As accomplished personal injury attorneys with extensive knowledge in Illinois law, our main endeavor is offering strong support coupled with effective legal tactics during such trying times. Dog bite injuries are complex cases we excel at; understanding how traumatic the experience could be, we ensure empathy comes combined with expertise for every client’s case.

Carlson Bier takes key pride in top-notch advocacy when it comes to dog bite injuries. We believe each case deserves personalized legal guidance suiting individual needs which is why our diverse skill set stands unmatched in navigating Illinois’ stringent laws surrounding this specific form of personal injury.

For excellent representation unrivaled by peers and exceptionally tailored service put forth towards obtaining rightful compensation for your sufferings from a vicious dog attack, consider partnering up with Carlson Bier – Your trusted ally in pursuing steadfast justice against unwarranted harm.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Wataga Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your trusted Illinois based personal injury law group, we have developed an unparalleled expertise in a diverse field of personal Injury claims–one of these is Dog Bite Injuries. When dogs display dangerous behaviors leading to injuries or harm, it’s critical to know that you can legally seek and obtain redress for such distressing incidents.

Dog bites not only inflicts physical damage on an individual; they can also result in potentially debilitating psychological trauma. The subsequent medical treatments often required, including surgeries or therapy sessions, subsequently introduce unexpected financial burdens as well. Each year in the United States almost 4.5 million people are bitten by dogs with numerous people suffering serious injuries requiring specialized medical treatment – emphasizing the significance of this issue.

The circumstances surrounding dog bite cases vary greatly and navigating through the complexities of law might seem daunting without professional guidance. This is where our team at Carlson Bier becomes undeniably invaluable. As knowledgeable practitioners in Personal Injury Law with focus on dog-related harm, we understand all aspects pertaining to these situations such as:

• Understanding the Illinois One-Bite Rule: Unlike some states, Illinois doesn’t follow the one-bite rule wherein a pet owner might be exempt from liability if their pet has never shown any “dangerous propensity” or hasn’t bitten anyone before.

• Strict Liability Dog Bite Statute: Under section 16 of Illinois’ Animal Control Act, dog owners may be liable for bodily harm caused by their pets regardless of previous behavior trends.

• Claims against landlord: If a landlord knew about aggressive tendencies yet allowed its continued residence signifies neglect,, victim could potentially press charges against both the owner and possibly, landlord too.

Navigating these intricacies become an added trauma atop already pressing concerns post-incident which is why entrusting your legal protection to competent entities like Carlson Bier provides much needed alleviation. Drawing upon our deep skills repository allows us present optimal strategies tailored specifically for your claim.

Furthermore, we understand the gravity of each situation and offer a commitment to unwavering support from the moment you reach out to us until case resolution. A client-centered outlook is ingrained in our approach which makes it indispensable for us to prioritize personalised guidance, advice and explanation at every juncture ensuring open lines of communication throughout probable legal proceedings.

Additionally, working on contingency basis implies: We only get paid if and when you do. This ensures singular focus on achieving positive outcomes for your individual case as quickly as possible without burdening clients with upfront legal fees.

Injury cases are won by rapid response wherein immediate consultation can drastically increase chances of successful claim filing hence Carlson Bier’s dedicated team being readily available around-the-clock proves immensely beneficial.

Our personal injury lawyers are adept at assessing if damages were caused because someone else was negligent or careless applicable through careful evidence aggregation and vigorous negotiation; Commitment to ensuring we apprise our clientele enabling effective informed decision-making underpins all we do at Carlson Bir.Attaining rightful compensation relieving weighty financial pressure brought about medical expenses – an endeavor solidifying how indispensable sound legal counsel truly becomes.

We invite readers ready to take next step in finding exactly what their case could potentially be worth by offering quick, accurate and comprehensive evaluation easily achievable via clicking button below.If inflicted due dog bite in Illinois; Don’t hesitate! Click now – Let’s lay foundation stone annotated journey towards potential compensation realisation together.Constant readiness awaits patrons existing or new ensuring stellar aid provision from industry leading experts right here at Carlson Bier – Your trusted personal injury law group.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wataga Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Wataga

Areas of Practice in Wataga

Cycling Crashes

Focused on legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Scald Wounds

Providing specialist legal assistance for victims of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Medical Carelessness

Offering experienced legal representation for persons affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Obligation

Taking on cases involving problematic products, extending skilled legal guidance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Abuse

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Trip Injuries

Professional in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking restitution for their suffering.

Infant Injuries

Providing legal aid for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding clients of car accidents secure reasonable payout for injuries and damages.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Truck Collision

Extending expert legal assistance for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just claims for harms.

Construction Site Crashes

Engaged in advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Brain Injuries

Dedicated to delivering compassionate legal services for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Expertise in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Undeserved Loss

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal services to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Expert in assisting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​