FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Wataga

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When suffering from spinal cord injuries, securing sound legal representation can significantly impact the outcome. Carlson Bier, a distinguished and esteemed group of personal injury lawyers in Illinois, stands as an exceptional choice for upstanding representation. They demonstrate both unparalleled knowledge and profound understanding in handling delicate circumstances that arise with these injuries. Focusing on achieving justice for victims grappling with spinal cord damage, their dedicated team relentlessly pursues full compensation to cover medical expenses and any associated costs. With extensive experience at the heart of their practice and a proven track record tackling complex spine-related cases, they are experts you can count on. Their commitment is rooted strongly in your well-being: Getting you fair treatment while ensuring all negligent parties are held accountable is our goal – it’s not just about winning; it’s about protecting rights too! In Wataga or anywhere else within reach across Illinois state lines – one name springs to mind when seeking dependable legal help: Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Wataga Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a group of committed Personal Injury Attorneys operating in Illinois, striving to ensure that the individuals who are victims of unfortunate circumstances get the justice they deserve. One area of personal injury law that is both complex and requires specialized knowledge revolves around spinal cord injuries. Spinal cord injuries can have profound impacts on an individual’s daily life – from impairing physical mobility to causing substantial pain and discomfort leading to emotional distress.

A spinal cord injury occurs when there is damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal. This can often result in changes in strength, sensation, and other body functions below the site of the injury. These changes may lead to severe collateral health issues including respiratory diseases, chronic pain, bladder and bowel dysfunction among others.

In our experience as seasoned legal practitioners within this field, there are several key ways by which these catastrophes could occur:

• Motor vehicle accidents: A significant proportion of such injuries happen during automobile crashes.

• Falls: Especially for adults over 65 years old

• Violence: Approximately 15% arise from violent encounters involving knife or gunshot wounds.

• Sports: High-impact sports participation might also contribute significantly

• Medical/Surgical misdirections – instances where malpractices might occur

Regardless of how it happened, if you or your loved ones have suffered spinal cord damages due to someone else’s negligence or intentional harm; realize that seeking legal recourse is entirely within your rights. It becomes imperative then for victims and their families not only understand their entitlements but also be assured sufficient compensation based on the severity and long-term impact created by such debilitating conditions – And this is where Carlson Bier comes into play!

The initial shocks and confusion following incidents causing crucial spine shatterings could leave victims perplexed about necessary steps towards claiming justification. We’ll guide you through negotiations with insurance companies (who’re naturally skewed towards minimizing settlement payouts), court proceedings, if it has to come to that point, and understanding complexities surrounding spinal cord injuries legal framework. Prima Facie, accident responsibility, medical evidence connecting injury with the incident – we are right beside you navigating these intricacies.

• Accident Responsibility: It’s crucial to prove that the other party was responsible.

• Injury Due To Incident: For successful claim settlement establishing a direct link between the injury and accident is essential.

• Adequate Medical Evidence: Robust medical certifications corroborating your claims enhance possibilities of adequate compensations.

As every case is unique in its occurrence and impact; hence having skilled empathetic attorneys like ours at Carlson Bier could improve your odds exponentially towards securing apt restitution. Keep in mind that even minor spinal injuries can have lasting impacts exacerbating expenses both in economic terms (like loss of income) or non-economic implications (such as pain suffered); so don’t delay while asserting your rightful dues – Your health matters!

You can count on us to fight tirelessly for your justice because at Carlson Bier – We believe in you and value what’s best for you most. Our commitment doesn’t just stop at equitable redressal, but also involves enlightening our worthy clientele about detailed aspects pertaining to personal injury law – specifically those around heart-rending spinal snappings.

Finally, suffice it to say from years of assimilated experience if you’ve been subjected to any form of this ruthless type of harm; the path towards proper recompense could involve significant complications venturing onto it alone. But here’s where lawyers like us make all the difference!

Intrigued by how much YOUR case might be worth? Click on the button below now and get an estimated approximation immediately from one of our seasoned experts absolutely free! With Carlson Bier representing you – Nothing gets left behind when exploring desired indemnities following such life-altering experiences!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wataga Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Wataga

Areas of Practice in Wataga

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Damages

Giving skilled legal services for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Physician Carelessness

Offering expert legal assistance for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Accountability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, offering specialist legal support to victims affected by defective items.

Aged Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Fall Injuries

Specialist in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking compensation for their losses.

Birth Injuries

Supplying legal help for households affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Accidents: Focused on aiding victims of car accidents get just payout for wounds and destruction.

Bike Collisions

Focused on providing legal support for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Big Rig Incident

Providing professional legal services for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for damages.

Construction Site Incidents

Focused on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Brain Harms

Expert in extending dedicated legal support for patients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Adept at managing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Committed to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Wrongful Fatality

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and skilled legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Damage

Expert in supporting individuals with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​