Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Waterman

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries in Waterman, securing the services of a competent, reliable legal firm is crucial. Carlson Bier’s team of skilled personal injury attorneys are specialists in navigating complex Dog Bite Injuries cases. They offer an exceptional understanding of Illinois law and can effectively handle your case to deliver deserved compensation for physical harm and emotional trauma endured. It’s their wealth of experience that distinguishes them as a foremost choice amongst those seeking justice following such unfortunate incidents. Through thorough investigation, tireless fact-finding efforts and their seasoned litigation prowess, they take every stride within their power to win your unique case.Their commitment goes beyond just fighting cases; Carlson Bier provides advice on preventive measures against future attacks too; information often neglected yet crucially beneficial for locals’ safety.In short, it’s hardly about being close physically.Rather,it’s about close involvement & expertise.Turn to the best when you seek professional help related to Dog Bite Injuries – Consider Carlson Bier; devoted champions set on delivering due justice without geographical bounds.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Waterman Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are deeply committed to helping our clients navigate through the challenges they face following a dog bite injury. With headquarters right in Illinois, we provide unmatched legal representation with unrivaled dedication. Dog bites can lead to severe physical and emotional trauma that could impact the quality of your life. You should not have to bear these burdens alone; you need an experienced personal injury attorney at your side.

Several scenarios often lead to dog bites – from encountering an unrestrained pet while walking down the street or visiting a friend’s home unaccustomed to strangers – unexpected incidents can result in serious injuries. One moment you’re enjoying a stroll on Chicago’s magnificent avenues: the next, you could be navigating overwhelming medical bills while recuperating from painful wounds.

Key things to note when dealing with dog bite injuries:

• In Illinois, the owner of the dog is liable for all damages related to an attack if the person bitten did nothing to provoke it. This aspect of “strict liability” makes it easier for victims in Illinois compared to some other states where you must prove negligence.

• Medical attention should be sought promptly after any bite incident even if it appears minor initially; infections can swiftly follow creating complications. Proper documentation of your injuries is vital when building a compelling case.

• Emotional trauma from vicious attacks could manifest into post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), hence seeking professional counseling is advisable and such costs could be recovered as part of your claim.

• Lastly, never negotiate directly with insurance companies without consulting with an attorney first — insurers usually try settling quickly with lower-than-merited amounts before a victim realizes their long-term requirements.

Carlson Bier’s expertise extends beyond traditional courtroom battles; we also ensure our clients obtain full access to necessary resources aiding recovery journey— form finding top medical specialists ensuring appropriate therapy regime is developed— our hands-on approach addresses more than just legalities involved but also assists rebuilding lives impacted by these unexpected events.

Our team of personal injury lawyers combines decades’ worth insight understanding intricacies dog bite laws in Illinois, which places us uniquely to advocate powerfully on your behalf. We believe the pivotal purpose of our work is to champion for justice ensuring you regain control over your life following such a tumultuous incident; hence, we devote ourselves fully underpinning that commitment every step of the way.

At Carlson Bier, we empathize deeply with this significant chapter in your life; nonetheless are committed strongly to helping transform it into part of an empowering journey — one where resilience triumphs adversity. Through strategic legal representation coupled alongside compassionate counseling – we aim at securing not just financial stability enabling swift recuperation but also emotional closure from harsh memories such incidents inevitably plant.

We understand no two cases are alike thus always offer personalized services moulding our representation to fit individual circumstances guaranteeing best possible results. We assess all details thoroughly using firm’s extensive resources paving path for a solid foundation upon which successful claims can be built – maximizing potential compensation figures especially if severe scarring or disfigurements are involved as part of injuries sustained.

Overwhelming? Perhaps. But remember, you don’t walk this path alone. As your trusted personal injury attorneys based out of Illinois – we’ve made it our mission to stand by you during these trying times aiding with compassion and competency equally balanced– bringing hope amidst despair easing burdens while advocating fiercely seeking rightful reparations owed towards pain inflicted and suffering endured.

Dedicated support waits ahead– right at your fingertips; click the button below and let’s embark together discovering what your case is worth – allowing potential compensatory figures outline conceivable pathway visualizing renewed future post such distressful u-turn unanticipated chapters often add to life’s dramatic narrative scripts.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Waterman Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Waterman

Areas of Practice in Waterman

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Burns

Giving skilled legal advice for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Offering experienced legal assistance for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Fault

Addressing cases involving problematic products, offering professional legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Aged Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Tumble Mishaps

Expert in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Neonatal Damages

Providing legal aid for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Dedicated to guiding individuals of car accidents obtain equitable recompense for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Offering adept legal services for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Building Site Incidents

Engaged in representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Neurological Injuries

Focused on offering professional legal support for victims suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at addressing cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unfair Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and skilled legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spine Harm

Committed to advocating for patients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer