FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Watseka

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the complex world of medical malpractice can be daunting. Trust Carlson Bier, a distinguished personal injury law firm, to guide you with expertise and dedication. We have a long track record for effectively representing clients throughout Illinois against negligent healthcare providers. Medical errors that are preventable not only negatively impact your health but also cause emotional trauma and financial strain. Our team goes beyond simply understanding the subtleties of state laws; we evaluate each case meticulously to build compelling arguments so that victims receive rightful compensation they truly deserve. What sets Carlson Bier apart is our personalized approach—every client’s story is unique and thus deserves individualized attention and strategy in pursuit of justice. Rest assured, when choosing us as your advocate in such critical circumstances involving medical negligence, you’re opting for unmatched legal representation aimed at favorable results driven by steadfast commitment towards every client’s well-being. Count on Carlson Bier—the staunch champions defending victims of medical malpractice across Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Watseka Illinois

Medical malpractice remains a significant concern within the healthcare industry. As such, Carlson Bier takes pride in serving as potential clients’ trusted ally, offering highly-qualified personal injury representation based exclusively in Illinois.

Inaccurate diagnoses, ancillary surgical errors, or mismanagement of medical records may all constitute grounds for a legitimate medical malpractice case. Indeed, the vast uncertainty and complexities tied to the health profession cause too many people pain and suffering—an extreme burden if borne alone.

Our team at Carlson Bier has devoted countless hours studying these very conditions to ensure comprehensive support for victims of medical negligence. Over time, we’ve developed an innovative approach that encompasses four fundamental steps in successfully navigating medical malpractice cases:

• Thorough Investigation: Every claim launched with us begins with an exhaustive investigation aimed at gathering all crucial information related to your case.

• Substantial Evidence: Following this initial inquiry’s completion, our seasoned attorneys employ their extensive knowledge and experience to align pieces into a compelling argument based on substantial evidential backing.

• Consultation with Medical Experts: Next comes consultation with top-tier professionals from specific field related sectors whose insights prove invaluable when corroborating clients’ claims.

• Presenting Your Case: Lastly, our seasoned litigators leverage every shred of evidence gathered meticulously throughout the process to build and advance bold yet admissible arguments before presiding courts.

The significance of seeking assertive legal intervention amidst such instances often can’t be overstated—thus why Carlson Bier excels at demystifying processes surrounding medical malpractices while advocating relentlessly for our clients’ interests.

We believe that no individual should suffer additional pain due to technicalities or unfamiliarity – by distilling down complex jargon into digestible forms; we endeavor to fight not just for justice but also against daunting litigation-related intimidation others might feel stuck under.

If you have observed or experienced any undue harm resulting from misdiagnosis, drug administration error, surgical blunders, inadequate follow-up care or other healthcare related negligence—we beseech you to make immediate contact with our capable team. Together we’ll evaluate the particulars surrounding your experience and examine potential legal recourse available favoring your situation.

In trusting us with your case, not only will you find support from an empathetic team that truly understands but also the assuring confidence of knowing you’ve enlisted rigorous representation characterized by aptitude and a reputable track record in Illinois.

Above all, every personal injury attorney at Carlson Bier is committed to ensuring clients receive due compensation commensurate with their distresses – never settling for less than the absolute best outcome. This commitment underscores our steadfast promise: standing as steadfast allies advocating tirelessly on behalf of those impacted most by unfortunate occurrences of medical malpractice.

Recovering from injuries brought about by medical practitioners’ errors should not involve additional suffering through convoluted legal procedures or daunting corridors of justice… You don’t have to navigate this journey alone—Carlson Bier will guide you through it gently yet determinedly… offering trusted advice while fighting relentlessly for what’s rightfully yours.

Therefore, if you believe that medical malpractice may have played any part in worsening your condition—it’s time to act decisively—the beacon light has been lit, assertion and tenacity speak loudest here; Neither fear nor unfamiliarity should perturb…

Now armed with this information are we suggesting a prospective course of action? Yes! Click on the button below right now and take charge—find out how much your case could potentially be worth. Your trust in us translates into actionable attestation affirming one’s inherent right to dignity and respect… before anything else… just remember: if we don’t win, you pay nothing! Let Carlson Bier be the forceful advocate prompt justice necessitates–you deserve it!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Watseka Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Watseka

Areas of Practice in Watseka

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Damages

Giving skilled legal support for patients of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring specialist legal assistance for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Obligation

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, supplying expert legal help to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Abuse

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Trip Occurrences

Specialist in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal assistance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents secure equitable compensation for hurts and destruction.

Motorbike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal advice for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Truck Crash

Providing professional legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for hurts.

Construction Mishaps

Dedicated to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Impairments

Focused on delivering professional legal services for patients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Proficient in handling cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Committed to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Passing

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and expert legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on representing individuals with backbone trauma, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​