Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Watseka

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve suffered a spinal cord injury, choosing the right legal representation can make or break your case. Navigating this complex field is more achievable when entrusted to Carlson Bier, an expert law firm recognized throughout Illinois for its expertise in personal injury claims with a significant focus on spinal injuries. With their extensive understanding of this unique area of law and decades-long experience in dealing with insurance companies, medical professionals and opposing counsel, they provide unwavering commitment to secure the maximum compensation you deserve.

Having successfully represented numerous clients afflicted by life-altering spinal injuries through no fault of their own; Carlson Bier stands as beacon advocating for justice one case at a time. Inherently empathetic yet undeniably aggressive- they strive hard to hold negligent parties accountable while ensuring that your unique pain and suffering does not go unnoticed.

Trust Carlson Bier’s adeptness in handling delicate matters like Spinal Cord Injuries; this proficiency comes from fighting tirelessly for victims across diverse scenarios — whether it be simple slip-and-falls leading to tragic outcomes or complex cases involving catastrophic auto accidents. Remember: When looking out for your best interests after experiencing such trauma, rely on none other than Carlson Bier – relentlessly championing rights one settlement at a time!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Watseka Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we hold particular expertise in the complex field of Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs), an area that demands our complete understanding and empathetic focus due to its life-changing implications for victims. A comprehensive knowledge of SCIs is essential to navigate through the intricacies of legal representation effectively.

Our team ensures our clients achieve a robust understanding regarding their conditions, which aids in creating a healthy attorney-client relationship while also empowering them to make informed decisions with regard to their cases.

Spinal cord injuries primarily occur due to sudden blows or cuts to the spine, often causing fractures or dislocation of vertebrae. The impact can vary profoundly; from temporary bruising or tear of the spinal cords resulting in limited mobility loss, neck pain and numbness—known as incomplete SCI—to severe damage leading complete paralysis—referred as complete SCI.

Key factors identifying the severity of Spinal Cord Injuries include:

• Location: Injury at any level could possibly lead one paralyzed from that point down. Higher injuries contribute towards more severe consequences such as quadriplegia, whereas lower ones usually result in paraplegia.

• Extent: Completeness determines whether it’s a total loss of sensory and motor function below injury level (complete) or partial where some functions remain operative (incomplete).

Employing this detailed understanding about SCIs allows us at Carlson Bier Associates, not only to build stronger cases but assist our clients’ journey through what may be an incredibly challenging period with assured compassion.

Furthermore, compensation for spinal cord injuries isn’t confined solely to present medical expenditure; future ongoing costs including physical therapy charges, adaptation requirements for homes/vehicles are significant considerations too alongside probable lost wages potentially running into millions over time if working capacity is affected.

As your trusted ally and counsel within these proceedings Carlson Bier’s dedication will be unswervingly focused on securing comprehensive financial relief facilitating you toward the best life achievable post-accident.

These legal implications, although seemingly overwhelming, are part of the territory for experienced attorneys. At Carlson Bier, we maintain meticulous precision ensuring you’re well-armed with every claim element – medical expenses, pain and suffering, loss of consortium and income – solidly substantiated in pursuit of nothing less than a just reimbursement.

Evidence plays a monumental role within personal injury cases as does familiarity and understanding regarding countless laws affecting your case’s outcome. We are cognizant about under which circumstances breach of duty causing the injury can be implored or how fault may be established using ‘reasonably prudent person’ standard among others establishing liability resulting in SCI.

Remember:

• Never accept any settlement offer without our consultation to prevent undervaluing your claim.

• Do not mistakenly presume auto insurance will suffice all required compensation—adequate recovery frequently necessitates filing suit against guilty party directly.

Availability is another key aspect at Carlson Bier where addressing client questions, informing them regarding their case progress retains utmost priority establishing effective communication channels making this difficult time somewhat easier.

At Carlson Bier Associates located in Illinois, we earnestly believe that individuals affected by Spinal Cord Injuries deserve knowledgeable representation dedicated towards genuine advocacy and justice-driven negotiations to guarantee fair compensation.

Don’t let these spinal cord injuries change your life more than it already has. Secure assistance from our specialized team who constantly strives so each case meets its true value—because you certainly don’t want to settle for anything lesser!

Estimated compensation values contribute considerably towards planning future steps accordingly hence if you wish identifying what your case potentially could merit—click on the button below equipping yourself with an additional tool when considering this significant decision.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Watseka Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Watseka

Areas of Practice in Watseka

Cycling Collisions

Proficient in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or dangerous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering professional legal services for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Extending dedicated legal representation for persons affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Obligation

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, offering adept legal assistance to customers affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Tumble Accidents

Specialist in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking compensation for their damages.

Infant Harms

Supplying legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Dedicated to supporting clients of car accidents receive reasonable compensation for harms and impairment.

Motorbike Collisions

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Trucking Accident

Providing specialist legal advice for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for hurts.

Building Site Accidents

Engaged in assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Expert in delivering expert legal services for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Proficient in tackling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Focused on legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Undeserved Passing

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and professional legal services to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Dedicated to supporting persons with paralysis, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer