...

Bicycle Accidents in Watson

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When experiencing a bicycle accident, it’s crucial to retain reliable legal representation from the experts in the field. That’s where Carlson Bier comes in—providing unparalleled personal injury lawyer services focused on bicycle accidents. Our firm operates with an unwavering commitment toward protecting your rights and securing the highest possible compensation for your losses. We understand the complexities involved, ensuring that every case is adeptly handled. Why choose us? It isn’t just about our extensive experience or notable track record; it goes further to include personalized attention given to each client as we tirelessly fight on their behalf. Our success resonates across Illinois —we’re known for providing top-notch service when dealing with such specialized circumstances like yours—a bitter testament of bicycling incidents demanding justice and recompense from liable parties involved.. Turn this potentially stressful process into a seamless procedure by retaining Carlson Bier—the trusted authority on Bicycle Accidents law.Let us be your steadfast advocate; trust our expertise during this challenging time.Choose Carlson Bier—it’s simply synonymous with effective Bicycle Accidents legal support!

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Watson Illinois

Welcome to the web domain of Carlson Bier, a reputable personal injury law firm based in the great state of Illinois. Founded on core values of leadership, integrity, and justice, we are your competent partners passionately striving for fairness and compensation should you or a loved one ever become victims of unfortunate bicycle accidents.

Bicycle accident cases can be complex affairs due to multi-faceted factors like negligent drivers, uneven roads, faulty bicycle parts or even pedestrian interference. Our expertise lies in carefully dissecting these aspects to ensure maximum justice served. The process generally explores several key elements:

• Identification of liable parties: Determining who precisely is responsible for the accident requires investigating if it was due to driver’s negligence or poor infrastructure maintenance on part of local authorities.

• Perusal of critical evidence such as CCTV footage, eyewitness statements.

• Thorough analysis of medical paperwork: This entails reviewing your hospital bills, treatment details and foreseeing long-term implications affecting job security or mental health post-trauma.

At Carlson Bier, our legal maneuvers hinge on solid communication with clients backed by uncompromising dedication and respect towards their travails. We at all times keep stakeholders updated about case progressions while promptly addressing any concern raised.

Our professional responsibility extends beyond just judicial filings and courtroom representations; we join hands with clients tightly till they regain normalcy inch-by-inch after passing through untold hardships arising out of preventable accidents. For this reason we stay beside you during rehabilitation stages too – because helping you get back up not just symbolizes our work ethic but forms the basic necessity that motivates us every day!

The injuries arising from such incidents could range from minor scratches to spinal cord damage or traumatic brain injury leading to significant life-adjustments and huge financial burden. When guiding through these tricky paths we aim not just concentrate only on short-term aid received but a comprehensive coverage easing future burdens considerably too.

Moreover reputation plus results matter incredibly when pursuing settlements hence eons of combined experience rotating within the Carlson Bier family professes our ability to deliver. Our attorneys blend craft, perseverance and intellect aptly maneuvering critical legal landscapes to ensure you receive every dollar due.

A noteworthy point is that Illinois law doesn’t allow any form of advertisement implying service extension to towns or regions where the firm lacks a physical office presence. So we it is unnecessary at this point to mention any such implication – our reputation has already crossed borders without resorting to such tactics.

Time on your side dwindles rapidly after an accident thanks to state stipulated deadlines for filing personal injury claims therefore acting fast benefits in several ways: preserving crucial evidence, tracking witnesses plus complying with statutory requirements. Hence once safely out from immediate medical purposes do contact us and let’s chalk out together the way forward!

Embracing lesser trauma and more peace-of-mind post-accident begins with a swift click below. We invite you now, yes right now; not tomorrow or day-after! Click on the button below to take your first step towards fact-finding about potential claim worthiness; because when recovery and relief matter so much then why delay even by an inch? You have everything to gain here – absolute transparency coupled with caring professionals readily accessible round-the-clock ensuring that justice never sleeps regarding bicycle accidents involving you or dear ones! Just one contingent fee required if successful apart from initial consultation being absolutely free. Get started now – YES NOW – Equip yourself with Carlson Bier advantage today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Watson Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Watson

Areas of Practice in Watson

Bike Mishaps

Focused on legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Extending adept legal services for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Healthcare Negligence

Offering specialist legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Accountability

Handling cases involving faulty products, delivering adept legal support to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Slip Injuries

Expert in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking redress for their damages.

Childbirth Traumas

Extending legal help for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Incidents: Devoted to supporting sufferers of car accidents get just settlement for damages and damages.

Motorcycle Accidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Crash

Offering experienced legal services for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for injuries.

Building Site Incidents

Dedicated to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cognitive Harms

Focused on delivering expert legal representation for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in handling cases for clients who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Death

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and skilled legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Damage

Focused on representing victims with vertebral damage, offering expert legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer