...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Watson

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a dog bite injury can be an ordeal that demands the expertise of apt legal assistance. Carlson Bier, a prestigious personal injury law firm in Illinois, is exceptionally equipped to handle Dog Bite Injuries cases ensuring swift and fair compensation for your trauma. Our prowess in the interpretation and articulation of complex laws governing such incidents sets us apart from our contemporaries. We bring forth years of experience by accomplished attorneys who have represented numerous clients successfully, cementing their trust in Carlson Bier’s unparalleled commitment towards justice. As experts dedicated to winning you rightful recompense, we meticulously evaluate each case with detailed scrutiny offering personalized guidance throughout the legal process. Close proximity does not define competence; hence it matters little where our office stands physically as long as we stand firmly by your side attempting tirelessly to turn odds into favorables legally and ethically within Watson territory. Facing dog bite injuries? Choose Carlson Bier because here your peace is our priority!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Watson Illinois

At the law firm of Carlson Bier, our passion for justice and commitment to our clients enables us to deliver comprehensive legal services in a wide spectrum of personal injury cases. Located right here in Illinois, we’re your dedicated advocates in dog bite injuries, extensively practiced and with a deep understanding of this area of personal injury law.

Thousands fall victim to dog bites annually across America, leading to severe physical and emotional tolls that no one should have to endure unnoticed or uncompensated. Dog bite lawsuits can become intricate, often involving complex questions about animal behavior, insurance policies, homeowner’s responsibility and so forth. This is precisely the reason why you need experienced professional guidance like ours.

A fundamental aspect to note is that Illinois follows what’s commonly referred as ‘Strict Liability’ in relation to dog bites or attacks. If an individual sustains injuries from an unprovoked attack by a canine directly or indirectly (being knocked over or chased into harm), under most circumstances, the owner is legally accountable regardless of any previous indications of dangerous tendencies by the animal involved.

When dealing with such incidents there are salient factors you should remember:

• Seek Immediate Medical Attention: Your health takes precedence; furthermore records from prompt medical care substantiate your claim.

• Document The Event As Thoroughly As Possible: Photos capturing visible wounds/injuries support your case significantly.

• Report To Animal Control Authorities: It’s essential for public safety protocols and supplements your claim through official reports.

• Identify The Dog And It’s Owner: Vital information relating not only towards accountability but also regarding vaccination procedures if required.

Our objective at Carlson Bier is enabling victims make informed decisions during their time of distress caused by these unfortunate incidents. With adept negotiation skills and vast litigation experience under our belts, we represent your interests with zealousness tempered by strategic catechism pursued relentlessly until justified restitution has been attained on behalf of client who has suffered due such negligence.

Illinois statute of limitations offers a timeframe of two years from the date of the dog bite incident till when one could file a lawsuit for personal injury claims. We will ensure you are not only within these prescribed boundaries but also well ahead in terms of preparedness and substantial, provable material required to propel your case towards rightful fruition.

The spectrum of possible recuperation after an incident like this extends beyond physical signs of distress. It includes loss of income, past & future medical expenses and emotional distress which is often overlooked aspect despite holding clear relevance under Illinois law. Our team works diligently to hold parties responsible accurately accountable envisaging means to restore sense normalcy back into victims’ lives post such traumatic events, client-centric approach being pivotal driving force every juncture.

Our legal roadmap emphasizes nurturing transparency between ourselves and our clients; offering holistic lawyers-client relationships founded on trust, empathy and our unwavering commitment to reach fair trials, mediation settlements based on comprehensive evaluation procedures that necessarily include each unique circumstance surrounding such incidents.

At Carlson Bier experience meets passion with determination pursued relentlessly until justice has been served rightfully. The momentary satisfaction derived from quick offers made by insurance companies without knowledgeable review can have grave repercussions later blocking potentially larger damages deserved rightfully. Trust us as we work tirelessly serving you best interests helping comprehend complexities navigating through nuanced negotiation realms while always standing alongside lending supportive shoulder throughout challenging times placing clients’ welfare at heart prior professional obligation.

Determining what’s exactly owed due such injuries requires tactful analysis coupled with deep understanding intertwined with intricacies among both statutory guidelines along topical knowledge negotiating with insurance companies bringing forth most favorable results for those whose rights been violated due rash negligence others. For detailed scrutiny allowing us figure optimal legal recourse fostering much-needed peace mind conceiving powerful lasting impact long term, we invite readers click button below finding out worth exact case restoring faith justice system resilience unmatched assured universe legal possibilities undeterred obstacles coherence leading victory against irresponsible parties. At Carlson Bier, we aren’t merely legal representatives–we’re partners in your journey towards restoring justice and peace of mind. Your cause is our calling.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Watson Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Watson

Areas of Practice in Watson

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Extending skilled legal services for patients of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Medical Malpractice

Ensuring dedicated legal support for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Obligation

Handling cases involving dangerous products, supplying professional legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Fall Incidents

Skilled in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Wounds

Offering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Accidents: Focused on aiding individuals of car accidents get appropriate recompense for wounds and damages.

Bike Collisions

Committed to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Big Rig Collision

Providing professional legal assistance for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Worksite Incidents

Engaged in assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Committed to ensuring expert legal assistance for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Damages

Adept at managing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Focused on legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Passing

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and expert legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Harm

Focused on defending clients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​