FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Watson

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been involved in a pedestrian accident in Watson, the time to secure efficient legal representation is now. Your first consideration should be Carlson Bier, one of Illinois’s most accomplished personal injury law firms. We have an extensive track record focused on resolving complex cases related to pedestrian accidents assertively and efficiently while ensuring maximum compensation for our clients. Our expert attorneys understand the intricacies of such accident claims – from scrutinizing evidence to dealing with insurance companies or initiating lawsuits when necessary. At Carlson Bier, we advocate on your behalf through every step of what can often be a confusing and stressful process – focusing our efforts directly on safeguarding your interests while you recover physically and emotionally from your ordeal.

Using their years of experience handling similar situations, our team adopts strategic approaches that align best with each case’s specific needs making us unparalleled advocates for victims navigating these circumstances in Watson region. Choose confidence; choose expertise; choose Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Watson Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law services throughout the state of Illinois, including cases centered around pedestrian accidents. A wealth of experience and knowledge makes us well-equipped to tackle these complex situations with the dedication that our clients deserve.

Pedestrian accidents present a unique set of challenges for victims. These incidents can occur due to various factors such as distracted driving or negligence on behalf of drivers. Unexpected moments can change lives on an unimaginable scale, leading to physical harm, psychological trauma, financial strains as medical bills pile up and even wage loss due to inability to work.

Research indicates key causes for pedestrian injuries include:

• Distracted or impaired driver.

• Insufficient visibility or poor lighting conditions.

• Failure to observe traffic signals by both drivers and pedestrians.

• Pedestrians not using crosswalks correctly.

To illustrate further, negligent behavior from drivers could lead to harsh repercussions. For instance, a driver who fails to yield right-of-way at intersections could strike unsuspecting pedestrians crossing the road. Similarly, improper lane usage or reckless speeding can result in dire consequences.

At Carlson Bier our aim is not solely getting compensation for the immediate aftermath; our vision extends beyond that horizon. We strive toward ensuring security for your future too. Our focus encapsulates long-term implications —like ongoing rehabilitation costs— alongside present requirements including current medical expenses and coverage for lost earnings related directly due to accident-induced incapacitation.

Every case we handle is treated with distinct care comprehending each circumstance’s unique factors: severity of injuries received; potential requirement for future therapy or surgeries; extent and permanence caused by any disability.

On encountering such life-altering mishaps, details may slip through unnoticed during claim filing process which might result in biased settlements failing true justice delivery commensurate with their pain endured:

-Properly interpreting police accident reports are crucial: they provide significant perspective about parties involved and circumstances surrounding incident.

-Obtaining and analyzing medical records elucidate severity of injuries sustained; this is indispensable for calculating rightful compensation.

-Accurately determining degree of motorist’s neglect forms basis for acquiring recompense upheld by the law.

Adhering to prescribed statute of limitations is equally critical. In most personal injury cases in Illinois, legal action must be taken within two years from date of incident.

However, circumstances often dictate variances hence consulting with an attorney early can prove beneficial ensuring that no rights are forfeited due to time lapse. Proactivity could also aid evidence preservation adding greater weightage to your claim.

Confidently navigating through these challenges requires broad knowledge base combined with sharp acumen — traits our team at Carlson Bier possess inherently owing to numerous successful representations over decades.

As premier personal injury attorneys, we pride ourselves on personalized client attentiveness, maintaining transparency throughout proceedings keeping you apprised every step toward achieving justice that you deserve. Our commitment to pursuing fair compensation following pedestrian accidents embodies our firm’s overarching objective: advocating clients’ wellbeing amidst such tumultuous periods.

Our no-win-no-fee structure ensures that financial constraints never hinder your quest for justice; you only pay us if we successfully secure a resolution compensating your damages in line with Illinois law regulations.

Emotional turmoil coupled with paperwork burden might pose overwhelming obstacles during such distressing times. Lean on us as your compassionate ally steadfastly dedicated toward fighting on behalf precisely because we understand how imperative it is—financial recovery securing future stability paving way toward life restoration post-trauma.

Now take the initiative towards beginning that restorative journey landing equitable remuneration commensurate with ordeal faced till now: Click on the button below to learn what your case could potentially hold for you based upon factors discussed above. With Carlson Bier by your side, hope instills anew reignited afresh even amidst darkest despairs post pedestrian accident survival. Trust us today for that brighter tomorrow; you certainly deserve it and we pledge our dedicated efforts toward making it happen.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Watson Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Watson

Areas of Practice in Watson

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Supplying skilled legal services for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Hospital Negligence

Ensuring specialist legal services for victims affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Accountability

Managing cases involving problematic products, providing specialist legal guidance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall & Tumble Incidents

Expert in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their losses.

Birth Traumas

Delivering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Collisions

Mishaps: Concentrated on supporting individuals of car accidents get equitable settlement for harms and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Truck Accident

Delivering expert legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for losses.

Construction Site Crashes

Dedicated to assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Neurological Traumas

Specializing in offering expert legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in tackling cases for people who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Focused on legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unfair Death

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and professional legal support to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Expert in defending persons with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​