...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Wayne

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Mitigating the catastrophic repercussions of spinal cord injuries is a cornerstone commitment at Carlson Bier. Our seasoned attorneys advocate fiercely for victims’ rights, working diligently to ensure they receive suitable compensation. Drawing on our comprehensive understanding and robust experience in Illinois’ legal landscape, we skillfully litigate complex cases involving distinct aspects of spinal cord injuries: paralysis, surgical errors, malpractice claims; indifference to patient needs; failure to diagnose or treat conditions promptly. Trusting your case with Carlson Bier means partnering with an empathetic ally who comprehensively grasps the emotional turmoil you navigate post-injury and aids in your journey towards recovery and reclamation of quality life by fighting tenaciously for justice throughout litigation proceedings. We aim for nothing less than maximum settlements or verdicts that equip our clients adequately cover medical expenses, loss of income, pain and suffering—staking out a pathway back from injury’s precipices. When seeking dependable legal representation following traumatic spinal cord injury experiences in Wayne city or elsewhere in Illinois – trust none but Carlson Bier because we turn relentless advocacy into meaningful results.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Wayne Illinois

As a leading personal injury law firm in Illinois, Carlson Bier has the expertise and dedication in representing victims of various injuries remarkably those emanating from spinal cord damage. Spinal cord injuries can lead to devastating changes in an individual’s life; therefore, it’s only fair that they are compensated adequately for their suffering and possible long term disability.

Spinal Cord Injuries regarded as one of the most severe personal injuries due to its tremendous impact on a person’s quality of life. They often occur through direct trauma to the spine during accidents or falls but can also arise from situations like medical malpractice where surgeries have gone wrong. This type of injury leads to different complications such as pain, sensory deficits, mobility issues, paralysis,and other related health issues.

If you or your loved one sustains a spinal cord injury because of someone else’s negligence or fault, it’s essential to understand your right to compensation. The legal aspects involve proving negligence and establishing liability against the party at fault:

• Proof must be provided by showing that the defendant acted negligently

• The negligent act resulted in an accident

• You suffered a spinal cord injury as a consequence of this accident

• Documentation of all the damages induced by this particular injury

Carlson Bier dedicated team offers full-service representation throughout every phase of your case including timely response and updates,research into case specifics,evidence collection,litigation,negotiation with insurance companies,jury trials when needed among others.

We understand that no amount reimbursed can ever fully compensate for loss,the physical discomfort,and emotional distress following a spine injury.But our goal is essentially about ensuring victims secure maximum damages possible.With monetary restraining factors, accessibility and affordability considerations,this helps cater for expensive medical treatments associated with these types.Myriad costs such as physical therapy sessions,specialized equipment,wheelchair accessibility enhancements at home,pain management care,future surgical operations,and expected lifelong related healthcare expenses.

Here at Carlson Bier, we apply in-depth knowledge and proficiency to successfully litigate spinal cord injury cases. Our confident attorneys have a strong command of the medical terms associated with these injuries. They have ample understanding about causes, symptoms, treatment options and prognosis for each type granting our firm the ability to explain all this to juries articulately—information that’s central during victim representation at court.

It’s noteworthy that personal injury law has boundaries set by statutes of limitation whereby victims are availed limited time within occurrence to file claims. If you think you’re eligible for damages recovery because of negligence or misconduct resulting in your spinal cord injury, do not delay seeking legal advice from competent attorneys such as Carlson Bier’s experienced team in Illinois.

Should you face life-altering consequences from a spinal cord injury,it is crucial to secure skilled legal help.You deserve fierce advocates who will press passionately and competently on your behalf.This is where Carlson Bier shines.Our battle-tested group will put their comprehensive expertise and resources into analyzing every facet of your situations,to craft strongest possible case.Conclusively,it is due to our commitment towards protecting rights while aggressively pursuing justice that makes us stand out.Your fight is our fight,and helping individuals regain control over lives after devastating events forms our core mission.

Crucial moments lie ahead—you’ve started learning about spinal injuries,the rights you hold,and potential compensation.Now it’s time to make an informed decision.We invite you take next step.Get in touch with us right away or simply click button below to find out what your case might be worth.Together, let’s ensure justice prevails! Don’t leave your fate up in the air.Start grabbing reins today with Carlson Bier by your side.Remember,time remains an essential factor—do not wait too long before taking action.Carlson Bier,a reliable partner towards road for recovery.We’re here for you,every step along the way.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wayne Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Wayne

Areas of Practice in Wayne

Cycling Crashes

Proficient in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Fire Injuries

Giving expert legal assistance for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Healthcare Carelessness

Extending experienced legal assistance for persons affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Obligation

Addressing cases involving problematic products, supplying expert legal services to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Slip Injuries

Specialist in handling trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking restitution for their suffering.

Infant Damages

Offering legal aid for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Mishaps: Dedicated to assisting clients of car accidents receive just compensation for hurts and impairment.

Bike Crashes

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Trucking Accident

Extending expert legal assistance for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for losses.

Worksite Accidents

Engaged in assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cerebral Injuries

Focused on providing compassionate legal services for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Injuries

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Undeserved Demise

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and adept legal services to ensure justice.

Backbone Damage

Committed to advocating for patients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer