...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in West Frankfort

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unpredictable event of a dog bite injury, it is crucial to have competent legal representation. The attorneys at Carlson Bier specialize in handling cases related to Dog Bite Injuries and have an enviable track record of success in Illinois. They understand that such incidents can lead to severe physical harm and emotional trauma. Therefore, their approach integrates not only aggressive courtroom tactics but also utmost empathy towards their clients. While keeping abreast with West Frankfort’s local laws and litigation environment, they craft strong defense strategies maximizing your chances for a favorable settlement or verdict. With Carlson Bier representing you, be assured of personalized attention from experts equipped with apt knowledge encompassing medical-legal aspects associated directly with dog bite injuries along with in-depth jurisdictional understanding of personal injury law by virtue of being seasoned lawyers based out of Illinois itself! Trust the reliable partnership offered by Carlson Bier- because when dealing with dog bites injuries; experience matters much more than proximity! Be its intense negotiations or comprehensive court trials — choose endless commitment over mere convenience.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in West Frankfort Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the complications and distress associated with dog bite injuries. As an established Illinois personal injury law firm, our goal is to provide clients like you with comprehensive knowledge, taking the guesswork out of legal processes. Operating within state regulations and laws, we strive to secure your rights should you fall victim to a dog bite incident.

Dog bites can give rise to numerous physical and psychological damages that extend beyond immediate injury. It’s critical to comprehend this wide-ranging impact so as not understate your predicament when seeking legal remedy:

• Severe Physical Injury- Dog bites might result in severe physical injuries such as broken bones or puncture wounds requiring immediate medical attention.

• Infection Risk- Due to bacteria present in a dog’s mouth, there’s also an increased risk of infection which may necessitate advanced medical procedures.

• Emotional Trauma- Many victims endure logistic emotional trauma following a dog-bite incident. This could manifest as recurring nightmares, fear of dogs, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

• Financial Aftermath- The financial burden submarines from expounding medical bills and potential loss of wages due to time off work for recovery.

Illinois follows strict liability laws concerning dog bites. As per Animal Control Act 510 ILCS 5/16 states the “owner is liable for civil damages if their pet attacks without provocation.” It implies the owner cannot escape responsibility by claiming they were unaware of their pet’s violent predisposition. Even more, you aren’t required to prove negligence on behalf of the pet owner – only that you did not provoke it towards resulting hostility.

Despite these solid ground rules set by Illinois’ laws regarding dog bites, winning a lawsuit remains nuanced and intricate. Numerous factors can potentially restrain or amplify compensation amounts depending on individual cases:

• Demonstration that no direct or indirect provocation took place

• Proof validating presence at location was justified

• Evidence affirming negligence by the dog’s owner.

At Carlson Bier, we dutifully navigate these complexities surrounding personal injury cases ensuring you receive a fair and just compensation compatible with the severity and consequences of your injuries. Our experienced attorneys leverage decades of experience working on similar suits to establish the best course of action for you.

Successfully building a winnable case pivots around timely evidence collection post-incident. Quick action enables crucial data collation, before any potential disappearance or degradation:

• Photographs capturing visible injuries and location

• Immediate medical attendance for subsequent record creation as official documentation

• Witnesses contacts (if any) at scene

We serve in tandem with our clientele to gather all necessary information, extending from immediate aftermath through long-term implications faced due to such distressing incidents.

It’s understandable that facing an unnerving incident like a dog bite might seem overwhelming setting off perplexing chain reactions in medical, legal, financial aspects alongside emotional turmoil. Let us assist you through this challenging journey where our expertise converts into your empowerment and knowledge enrichment aiding in objective decisions throughout your litigation seeking full recovery.

Explore the next steps toward winning rightful compensation via consulting our seasoned personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier. We vow to untangle the intricate web interconnecting liability laws relating to dog bite incidents in Illinois fostering swift justice bolstered by comprehensive subject matter knowledge back-up on-suit.

To explore more about how Carlson Bier can cater tailored assistance pertaining your specific circumstance straighten out complexity knots paving way towards secure rights enforcement, click on the button below — discover how much your case might be worth! Find solace entrusting experienced professionals navigating potent solutions combating unlawful inflictions whilst advocating your rights unwaveringly within Illinois jurisdictional ambit; remember “Justice delayed is justice denied.”

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For West Frankfort Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in West Frankfort

Areas of Practice in West Frankfort

Cycling Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Supplying adept legal assistance for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Physician Malpractice

Delivering dedicated legal assistance for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Obligation

Taking on cases involving defective products, providing expert legal guidance to victims affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Neglect

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Tumble Incidents

Specialist in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Harms

Extending legal support for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Crashes: Dedicated to aiding individuals of car accidents gain equitable payout for hurts and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Ensuring expert legal services for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for losses.

Construction Collisions

Committed to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Committed to providing compassionate legal services for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Traumas

Proficient in dealing with cases for people who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unfair Demise

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and experienced legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Damage

Expert in defending clients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer