...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in West Garfield Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate event that you or a loved one suffer from dog bite injuries, Carlson Bier specializes in this particular niche of personal injury law. We understand the trauma and potential long-term impact these incidents can inflict. As trusted partners in securing your rights and compensation, we bring our expertise to West Garfield Park victims. Our expert lawyers are exceptionally trained to contend with complex laws surrounding dog attacks. At Carlson Bier, compassion guides our approach as we recognize how such an ordeal affects your well-being. With a robust track record handling dog bite injury cases across Illinois, peace of mind will accompany your choice when you engage us for legal representation post-dog attack injustice.We equip ourselves with extensive knowledge and updated legislation insights regarding biting events involving dogs throughout Illinois state communities.so.There’s no question about it! When it comes to navigating through a formidable dog-ownership landscape following distressing encounters,your case deserves nothing less than exceptional advocacy – which is just what Carlson Bier offers!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in West Garfield Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that being a victim of a dog bite injury can be both a traumatic and stressful experience. As Illinois’s premier personal injury attorneys, our mission is grounded in offering top-tier legal representation to individuals grappling with the aftermath of such incidents. Dog bites can lead to severe physical injuries, emotional trauma and significant financial burdens due to medical bills. Our commitment lies in advocating vigorously for your rights while ensuring you attain the rightful compensation you deserve.

In the state of Illinois, dog owners are held accountable under what is known as “strict liability” law. This essentially means that if their dog attacks or injures another person without provocation, they stand liable for damages irrespective of whether or not the animal had any prior reported vicious behavior. It’s crucial that victims understand this aspect as it significantly determines how claims associated with dog bite injuries are handled.

External wounds such as scratches and punctures are often the most visually evident consequences following a dog attack. Internal injuries including broken bones or nerve damage might take longer to manifest but can have long-term repercussions on one’s health:

– Visible cuts or lacerations may necessitate stitches resulting in sizable medical bills.

– Infections at the site of the wound or radiating throughout the body could potentially require hospitalization.

– Traumatic psychological effects could warrant ongoing therapy sessions.

– Loss of income resulting from an inability to work during recovery.

At Carlson Bier, we are skilled in identifying these often-overlooked costs when formulating comprehensive claim strategies designed specifically around your needs.

Our team comprehends well how formidable navigating through legalese may seem especially when dealing with post-injury stressors: insurance claims processing complexities; understanding relevant legislations; calculating precise compensation figures – all imperative components demanding thorough attention which cannot be undermined. We commit ourselves wholeheartedly into ardently representing your case so you can prioritize recovering stress-free.

Moreover, it’s worth noting that there is a timeframe within which you must report your case to remain eligible for compensation in Illinois. The statute of limitations for dog bite cases affects the window within which legal proceedings must be initiated, therefore contacting us promptly ensures that all legal requirements are met without any inadvertent delay jeopardizing your rightful recourse.

The Carlson Bier team pledges commitment towards delivering uncompromising professional aid throughout each step involved in obtaining a fair settlement. We practice transparency and dedication to keeping our clients informed about all important updates regarding their cases.

Indeed, having strong legal support at your side can make the difference between settling for less than what you deserve or securing just recompense allowing you unburdened healing journey. And this is where we step in as an ally, championing for your rights while holding responsible parties accountable.

Navigating dog bite injuries can feel overwhelming; but with Carlson Bier’s expertise guiding you through every crucial aspect of your claim’s trajectory, it doesn’t have to be. Ensuring optimal handling of such sensitive cases driven by compassion and proficiency defines our firm’s approach embodying relentless pursuit for justice paired with extensive client-focused care.

We invite you now to take the next decisive step towards reclaiming control over this distressing episode in life. Click on the button below to find out how much your case is worth. Let us stand alongside you; place your trust in our experienced hands unwaveringly devoted towards achieving substantial financial relief and closure positive impact on fostering smooth transition beyond this adversity onto brighter horizons ahead.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For West Garfield Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in West Garfield Park

Areas of Practice in West Garfield Park

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Burn Wounds

Extending skilled legal assistance for people of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Physician Malpractice

Offering experienced legal representation for victims affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, providing professional legal assistance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Slip Mishaps

Professional in handling trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking justice for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Incidents: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents get just compensation for wounds and losses.

Bike Collisions

Focused on providing representation for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Semi Incident

Delivering expert legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for harms.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Cognitive Harms

Expert in delivering expert legal representation for patients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Specialized in handling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unfair Passing

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and expert legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Injury

Expert in advocating for individuals with vertebral damage, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​