...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in West Salem

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one encounter dog bite injuries in West Salem, it’s paramount that you put your faith in a seasoned and dedicated attorney. Look no further than Carlson Bier, an established personal injury law firm with a remarkable track record. Our attorneys have vast experience handling Dog Bite Injuries cases; they understand the plight faced by victims and are committed to ensuring fairness is served. At Carlson Bier, we prioritize our clients’ interests, seeking rightful compensation while easing their burden during such traumatic times. We meticulously review each case’s specifics to provide tailored legal solutions empowering victims as they navigate this challenging path towards justice. Offering exceptional knowledge of Illinois law related to dog bite incidents allows us to fight for maximum compensation on behalf of our clients effectively and efficiently. Professionalism aside, empathy defines our approach; we don’t simply represent you in court but also stand beside you in your pursuit of justice amid distressing situations. Heartfelt commitment combined with extensive expertise makes Carlson Bier the optimal choice for those grappling with Dog Bite Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in West Salem Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that being a victim of a dog bite can be an emotionally traumatic and physically painful experience. The sudden terror of an unprovoked attack, the sharp pain of canine teeth into your flesh, and the ensuing medical ordeal are not only deeply unsettling but can also lead to long-term issues such as trauma, infection or disfigurement. Our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys is based in Illinois and strives tirelessly to defend your rights and secure the compensation you deserve following a dog bite injury.

When you choose Carlson Bier to represent you, rest assured we have an in-depth understanding of the complex laws surrounding dog bites within Illinois. In compliance with state mandates, there are particular factors heavily enforced here which require us to prove:

– The defendant owned the dog

– The victim did not provoke the animal

– The victim conducted themselves peacefully

– That incident occurred while the plaintiff was legally on premises

Dog bites are a serious matter with profound implications for all involved parties. Notably, owners face strict liability for their pet’s actions under Illinois law: if their animal injures someone without provocation, they may have to bear financial responsibility regardless of previous knowledge about its viciousness. This could cover medical expenses, emotional distress damages, lost wages due to time off work recovering from injuries or undergoing treatments/surgeries among other potential costs.

Moreover, it’s vital to note that not all injuries may appear immediately post-bite – some conditions might manifest over time making it imperative to seek immediate professional medical attention even with seemingly minor injuries. Tracking these scenarios can also strengthen your case when fighting for recompense; documentation is key!

At Carlson Bier we champion advocacy and empathy above everything else. We firmly believe in delivering results that reflect fair recompense for your ordeal rather than what insurance adjusters deem tolerable amounts—a belief rooted firmly in our ethos as personal injury attorney specialists.

We navigate through the complex maze of legal procedures and insurance company strategies to ensure the best possible resolution for your case. We’re not just attorneys; we are your trusted advisors ensuring that every detail, however minor, is explored to its fullest degree.

As loyal advocates of dog bite victims in Illinois, you can count on us at Carlson Bier to fight for justice through seamless legal representation designed specifically around your individual needs. The trauma experienced in the aftermath of a dog bite should not be exacerbated by financial burdens or legal complexities – let us shoulder that burden while you focus on healing.

Estimating the value of your case could be daunting especially given the myriad elements potentially contributing to it but that’s where our expertise comes in! It’s not just about current medical bills—it includes potential future treatments, property damage if any, psychological counseling if needed due to post traumatic stress disorder and other intangibles like pain-suffering which need consideration too!

Inquisitive about what your own case might be worth? Would understanding this motivate your decision-making process towards seeking rightful compensation effectively/efficiently? We invite you then — click with confidence on the button below now for an insightful review into how much deserved reparations could truly encapsulate under competent guidance via Carlson Bier’s personalized approach tailored around each unique client scenario all within regulatory confines respecting state laws diligently. With Carlson Bier, peace-of-mind isn’t merely a prospect—it’s a guarantee!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For West Salem Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in West Salem

Areas of Practice in West Salem

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or dangerous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving specialist legal assistance for patients of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Liability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, offering professional legal services to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Abuse

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Slip Accidents

Adept in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking restitution for their damages.

Newborn Damages

Supplying legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Incidents: Focused on helping patients of car accidents gain fair recompense for damages and harm.

Motorcycle Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal support for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring professional legal advice for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for harms.

Worksite Collisions

Committed to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Neurological Injuries

Expert in delivering dedicated legal representation for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Passing

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal representation to ensure redress.

Backbone Trauma

Dedicated to representing patients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​