FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Westchester

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you need efficient representation for dog bite injuries in Westchester, let Carlson Bier provide the expert legal guidance and comprehensive support. Our dedicated team has established a remarkable track record of successfully handling these specific injury cases, assuring your rights are protected to pursue justice effectively. Dog bites can culminate in severe physical damage or debilitating emotional distress; we fully understand this at Carlson Bier. Hence, our committed attorneys go above and beyond to secure substantial compensation for both your immediate medical costs and any potential long-term implications related to the incident. We possess an impressive understanding of Illinois’ intricate dog bite laws which equips us with expansive knowledge that powers our professional prowess within this field. Given our specialized skills combined with a deeply personal approach to each case, we stand as an exceptional choice when seeking legal help for dog bite injuries in Westchester area.

So choose wisdom over hurt today; ensure peace tomorrow! Remember – “Your fight is ours too,” only at Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Westchester Illinois

Experience the professional and meticulous legal representation with Carlson Bier, your trusted personal injury attorney group in Illinois. As leading experts in our field, we specialize in a broad spectrum of personal injury cases encompassing diverse natures and themes. Journeying alongside our clientele journey, one pressing area within our expertise is Dog Bite Injuries – a surprisingly common occurrence with potential for severe physical impact and emotional distress.

Indeed, navigations through dog bite injuries are interlaced with complexities revolving around local laws, ownership negligence and insurance procedures. Rest assured that at Carlson Bier, we walk you systematically through these intricate processes to decode the multifaceted legalities into understandable terms. Our commitment lies deep in helping victims secure rightful compensation for medical bills, emotional turmoil, lost wages and other related concerns engendered by such traumatic events.

In engaging our committed representation on dog bite injuries, key features will be addressed succinctly:

• Thorough Investigation: We conduct an exhaustive probe into the incident’s circumstances to establish clear factual grounds.

• Identification of Responsible Party: Roosevelt Law Center identifies who is legally accountable for your injury – essential in achieving rightful compensation.

• Insurance Negotiations: Anticipate objective and persuasive negotiations with insurance companies on your behalf to claim fair indemnity.

• Legal Representation: Benefit from expert courtroom representation if going to trial becomes inevitable.

Reflect upon this knowledge with peace of mind knowing that Illinois law affirms strict liability on dog owners for any harm their pet inflicts unless the victim was provoking the animal or unlawfully trespassing at the time of attack. For example where an individual adjectives may include derogatory language or false representations regarding another person’s property or character.

As much as every case hinges upon its own unique factors like severity of injuries and determining liability party; typical compensations sought after includes payment for pain & suffering damages, past/current/future medical expenses including plastic surgery if needed along with income loss caused due to absence from work. In certain instances, you may even claim punitive damages if the dog owner’s negligence was particularly egregious.

Lastly, key aspects of Illinois Dog Bite Law that must be noted are:

• The statute essentially holds that dogs are not assumed dangerous until they have caused harm.

• If a victim can prove the owner could and should have known about the danger and yet didn’t take necessary precautions; higher compensations might be awarded.

• The legal deadline (statute of limitations) for filing such lawsuit is within 2 years from date of injury occurrence.

By encapsulating these technicalities cohesively at Carlson Bier, we guide victims to understand essentialities whilst pursuing their claims convincingly. With comprehensive knowledge working in synergy with uncompromised dedication; our aim fundamentally remains rooted towards helping victims achieve optimal legal compensation.

Navigate the labyrinthine journey of your dog bite injury case alongside our experienced team by clicking on the button below. At Carlson Bier, we proudly extend forth an entirely free consultation wherein we meticulously evaluate your unique circumstance offering you unparalleled insights into identifying potential compensations worth rightfully claiming against your situation.

Recognize strength in numbers? We do too. Harness crucial insights today by allowing us to assess how much your case might potentially be worth simply by clicking the ‘Free Case Evaluation’ button right below. Rest assured that it comes with utterly no obligations because at Carlson Bier, it’s all about getting YOU empowered for a decisively informed future!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Westchester Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Westchester

Areas of Practice in Westchester

Bike Incidents

Focused on legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Extending adept legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Providing experienced legal representation for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Fault

Dealing with cases involving defective products, supplying skilled legal guidance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Senior Misconduct

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Slip Accidents

Professional in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Injuries

Supplying legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Incidents: Devoted to assisting clients of car accidents gain fair remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Incident

Delivering professional legal assistance for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for hurts.

Building Site Collisions

Committed to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Neurological Harms

Dedicated to delivering compassionate legal support for patients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Proficient in handling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Undeserved Passing

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Injury

Committed to representing victims with paralysis, offering dedicated legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​