...

Bicycle Accidents in Westmont

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of bicycle accidents can be a daunting task. Individuals often face physical, emotional and financial challenges that compound the complexities of their situation. As such, it’s essential to secure legal assistance from accomplished professionals who understand these intricacies—that’s where Carlson Bier comes in. Recognized as one of Illinois’ premiere personal injury law firms with extensive experience in handling bicycle accident cases, we pride ourselves on offering unwavering advocacy for our clients where they need us most—notably in Westmont. Our attorneys work tenaciously to secure rightful compensation while skillfully navigating complex laws surrounding bicycle accidents—holding responsible parties accountable and working tirelessly towards securing resources needed for recovery. With unparalleled expertise and relentless commitment to justice, choosing Carlson Bier is not only an option—it’s your best step forward in turning today’s hardship into tomorrow’s brighter future—the firm you want by your side after a bike accident.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Westmont Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our collective commitment to securing justice for individuals suffering from personal injuries is unflagging. As seasoned Personal Injury Attorneys based in Illinois, we have significant experience dealing with a multitude of cases – notable among them are Bicycle Accidents.

Bicycle accidents can be devastating, leading to severe injury and even death. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, approximately two percent of all motor vehicle crash deaths are bicyclists. Often unseen until it is too late, bicycles do not provide the same protection as vehicles making bicycle accidents potentially catastrophic.

Although bicycle riders follow many of the same traffic laws as motorists, the legal nuances surrounding bicycle accidents are often complex. These include properly identifying who is at fault for causing an accident or examining how liability insurance applies in such cases. It’s noteworthy that Illinois law states a cyclist needs to ride on designated bike paths unless passing another vehicle or preparing for a left turn or when necessary to avoid hazardous conditions.

To expand your understanding, here are some essential points regarding Bicycle Accidents:

– Every state has different rules about how compensation should be awarded after a bicycle accident.

– Many factors can later influence what damages you may collect–such as if you wore safety gear like helmets and pads.

– The common types of injuries suffered by cyclists include traumatic brain injury (TBI), fractures, lacerations, contusions or abrasions.

– Accident reconstruction experts could be used by both defendants and plaintiffs during litigation procedures.

Your rights as an accident victim deserve to be fully protected whether you were commuting to work by bike or enjoying a sunny recreational afternoon ride before tragedy struck. Our job begins where your distress started—we guide individuals through the somewhat overwhelming legal landscape immediately following these unfortunate incidents with empathy and acuity both.

The variables involved in bicycle accident cases require that they get analyzed through various well-honed legal lenses—each incident carries unique circumstances needing detailed attention; assigning negligence appropriately requires comprehensive analyses of traffic laws, insurance regulations, and situational contexts. At Carlson Bier, we do exactly that—meticulously analyze each case to ensure our clients receive maximum possible compensation for their ordeals.

Remember—one critical element in personal injury law involves the concept of negligence. For any bicycle rider injured due to another person’s negligence such as a motorist not giving bicycles three feet of clearance while passing, failing to yield at an intersection, etc., may be considered negligent. As per Illinois law, it is crucial in seeking legal redress.

That said, engaging suitable legal representation aids not just in understanding and asserting your rights but also eases the ordeal marginally by offering you assurances regarding competent handling of procedural requirements leading possibly to fair compensation. This is where our seasoned Personal Injury Attorneys bring you immeasurable value from their broad-spectrum knowledge amassed over years representing similar cases successfully.

Creating this content aimed at educating individuals like yourselves about Bicycle Accidents reiterates our pledge towards community service—even when ensuring potential clients possess adequate ammunition via information becomes vital; so you can make informed choices going forward after confronting adversities brought upon by bicycle accidents

With every moment passing post-accident potentially influencing your eligibility to claim damages—it becomes fundamentally important that you engage experienced personal injury attorneys promptly. We encourage clicking on the button below to find out what your case might be worth allowing us at Carlson Bier an opportunity proving how dedicated we are towards championing your cause with unrelenting diligence and unequivocal commitment.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Westmont Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Westmont

Areas of Practice in Westmont

Bike Collisions

Proficient in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Supplying professional legal advice for victims of grave burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Hospital Malpractice

Delivering specialist legal assistance for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Obligation

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal support to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Malpractice

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Tumble Incidents

Adept in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking redress for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Crashes

Incidents: Devoted to assisting clients of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Collisions

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Semi Mishap

Offering professional legal assistance for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Cognitive Harms

Expert in delivering specialized legal advice for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Crashes

Focused on legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Injury

Dedicated to supporting persons with paralysis, offering specialized legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer