...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Westmont

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re a resident of Westmont grappling with a dog bite injury, turn to Carlson Bier – the gold standard for personal injury law in Illinois. Dog bite cases require meticulous attention to detail and strong representation which embodies strength and persistence. When selecting your legal advocate, consider the distinct qualities that set apart Carlson Bier; combining astute knowledge of Illinois laws governing dog bites, compassionate concierge-level customer service, and relentless pursuit of justice for our clients. Our firm understands the multiple dimensions impacted by such dangerous incidents – physical pain, emotional trauma, medical bills and more. For this reason we ardently strive to ensure victims receive rightful compensation through robust litigation strategies. We have proven repeatedly that when it comes to championing rights for dog bite injuries victims within Westmont or even across Illinois – nobody does it better than Carlson Bier! Choose us as your allies today in securing justice and turning around unfortunate circumstances into hopeful futures.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Westmont Illinois

Understanding the nuances of filing a personal injury claim after experiencing a traumatic dog bite incident can be overwhelming. Navigating through medical appointments, legal proceedings, and insurance claims necessitates expert assistance from reliable advocates like the personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier.

Dog bites not only cause physical harm but also inflict emotional trauma that can persist long after your injuries have healed. The repercussions range from minor puncture wounds to severe lacerations and possible life-threatening infections. Other possible consequences might include psychological distress, fear of dogs instilled in victims (especially children), aesthetic damage due to scars, and even long-term nerve damage.

The experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier specialize in providing empathic support along with aggressive representation for clients involved in dog bite incidents throughout Illinois. Knowledgeable about state regulations regarding pet ownership responsibilities, our team maintains upfront transparency concerning the strength of your case—avoiding any hidden surprises down the line.

Illinois operates under ‘strict liability’ laws when it comes to dog attacks. This means that an owner cannot evade responsibility by claiming they were unaware of their canine’s violent tendencies or arguing that the victim provoked the animal. If you’re bitten by a dog on public property—or lawfully present on private—establishing its ownership is all that’s required to hold them liable for damages incurred.

At Carlson Bier, we guarantee dedicated efforts put into every step essential for building robust cases:

– Assessing Medical Records: To establish clear connections between the attack and prorated injuries.

– Thorough Investigation: Collation of crucial evidence such as photographs of injuries or location where the event occurred becomes integral.

– Estimating Fair Compensation: Determining appropriate reparation amounts includes factoring in immediate medical expenses, future health care costs if prolonged recovery is anticipated, lost wages during recuperation periods and compensation for lasting emotional distress or disfigurement.

Often insurance companies are quick to offer minimal settlements without allowing sufficient time for the victim to fully appreciate the scope of their injuries and costs incurred. As specialists with extensive experience in dealing with such tactics, Carlson Bier will work tirelessly towards ensuring that victims receive appropriate compensation.

It’s crucial for victims to understand their rights under Illinois law: the statute of limitations for filing a dog bite injury lawsuit is two years from the date of occurrence. Missing this deadline can mean forfeiting rightful recompense claims altogether—which emphasizes how vital it is unwavering, expert legal help comes promptly following incidents.

We also advise potential clients that our attorneys operate by spending most of our practice time out-of-office engaging directly with those who need us. Therefore, it is important not to associate “location” with being present at a physical office space simultaneously offering high-quality service delivery. We’re here extensively throughout Illinois rather than any specific location per se.

Emphasizing your right to full recovery without worrying about its corresponding financial burden falls within our realm of expertise at Carlson Bier; creating stress-free recovery environments wherein we deal efficiently and effectively with all your personal injury claim demands while you recover peacefully.

Feel free to connect using the button below; it simply takes just a few minutes to fill out a brief questionnaire regarding your case specifics, allowing one of our expert attorneys gauge its worth accurately—so there’re no presumptions or false promises involved. Come explore why countless Illinois residents trust Carlson Bier for advice after dog bite incidences when seeking justice matters most. Leveraging over collective decades’ experiences handling numerous similar cases like yours definitely has perceivable advantages—and makes choosing us an expedient proactive decision moving forward amidst challenging circumstances further simplified.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Westmont Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Westmont

Areas of Practice in Westmont

Bicycle Accidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Supplying professional legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Medical Incompetence

Providing professional legal support for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, supplying specialist legal assistance to clients affected by harmful products.

Elder Mistreatment

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Stumble Accidents

Professional in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking restitution for their damages.

Newborn Wounds

Providing legal aid for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Crashes

Incidents: Committed to supporting victims of car accidents gain just payout for injuries and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal assistance for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Truck Mishap

Offering experienced legal representation for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for hurts.

Construction Site Incidents

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Brain Injuries

Focused on ensuring compassionate legal advice for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Injuries

Adept at addressing cases for clients who have suffered damages from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Committed to legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Loss

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and skilled legal representation to ensure restitution.

Backbone Injury

Dedicated to supporting patients with paralysis, offering expert legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​