...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Westville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Renowned throughout the state, the legal representation provided by Carlson Bier is second to none when it comes to dog bite injuries cases. Experience and determination are critical components in successfully navigating such a complex area of law, both of which we have in abundance. Within Illinois’ bustling legal realm, our dedicated attorneys exemplify trustworthiness and diligence affecting positive outcomes for their clients.

Entrenched within these fields, they understand that dog bites can lead to severe physical pain or even life-threatening consequences; emotional injury due to trauma is another impact often overlooked. Our team at Carlson Bier acknowledges these hardships, firmly advocating on behalf of victims seeking justice commensurate with their suffering.

Navigating intricate legislation on your own might not yield desired results; hence bringing expert lawyers like ours aboard can make an impacting difference in securing rightful compensation swiftly and efficiently. Committed towards excellence & proven track records aided by uncompromising work ethics puts us ahead amongst other personal injury lawyer firms lending credence while choosing us as your dependable counsel during taxing times dealing with Dog Bite Injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Westville Illinois

Expertly navigating the legal complexities surrounding dog bite injuries in Illinois, Carlson Bier offers exceptional representation ensured by our team of dedicated personal injury attorneys. We understand the physical trauma, frequent emotional distress, and substantial financial burden an unexpected dog bite injury can cast on victims. Our primary focus is to provide unwavering assistance throughout this challenging time.

Dog bites are a serious matter with approximately 4.5 million people bitten every year in the United States alone. Yet, what is even more concerning is that a significant portion of these incidents often result in severe injury or disease transmission like Rabies — making them far from trivial matters. At Carlson Bier, we believe it’s essential for each victim to be aware of their rights and potential avenues for obtaining compensation.

• Illinois adopts a ‘strict liability law’ related to dog bites that holds owners responsible for an unprovoked attack irrespective of whether the dog displayed prior viciousness.

• The Animal Control Act entitles you to seek damages if provoked aggression from the pet caused you physical harm while you were acting peacefully within your legal rights.

• Liability exemptions apply when provoking an animal into aggression; trespassing properties and professionals executing duties like veterinary services or mail delivery.

Our expert attorneys possess deep knowledge about these laws supplemented by years honed skills – assuring comprehensive evaluation of your situation to develop a personalized strategy that drives results. Furthermore, they will guide you carefully through different stages such as filing claims against parties involved, negotiating settlements on your behalf so that resulting medical costs or lost wages do not impose undue stress.

Beyond just understanding Illinois’s Dog Bite Laws, it pays dividends knowing about two key doctrines: contributory negligence and comparative fault which could significantly affect outcomes.

• Contributory Negligence bars plaintiffs’ recovery if their action contributed even marginally to instigating the incident e.g., harming or teasing animals before getting bitten.

• Comparative Fault allows damage claim reduction proportional to the victim’s fault but keeps compensation avenues open unless they are more at fault than dog owners.

These doctrines underscore why cases can be notoriously complicated, and guidance from qualified attorneys – like those at Carlson Bier – is indispensable to maximize potential compensation. We have a track record of securing full and fair recoveries for our clients through meticulous case handling.

Our injury law firm located in Illinois prides itself on providing meaningful support to victims of dog bite injuries. Over the years, we’ve handled countless similar cases successfully because we firmly believe that every victim deserves justice. Our team at Carlson Bier tirelessly works to establish owner’s liability, prove necessary elements required under the Animal Control Act whilst taking care of all legal proceedings seamlessly and promptly.

As reliable personal injury lawyers, we empathize with victims trying to navigate this distressing period post-injury but without clear understanding about exact compensations deserved or procedures involved. To help alleviate these concerns, we urge you to use our online tool specifically designed to calculate potential claim values relevant to your individual situation —which only requires relative few inputs reflective of your circumstances— obtaining an indicative figure real-time and stress-free!

We wish no one has ever got need professional representation following an unfortunate event such as a serious dog bite injury. However, if incidents occur unexpectedly causing physical damages demanding exceptional healthcare services or medical treatments leading consequent financial strains – remember that relief comes both via adept medication received from trusted healthcare providers as well as rightful compensations secured by reliable legal advisors.

Now that you grasp how rigorous yet compassionate our approach towards dealing with delicate matters like dog bite injuries is — it highlights why partnering with us should be your top priority during such overwhelming times. Assuring comprehensive legal coverage catered particularly for your case while protecting rights entitled under Illinois Law is what best defines us above everyone else.

Offering profound insights into complexities involved; educating about steps forward; explaining nuances related potential outcomes alongside absolute dedication towards recovering maximum compensations possible — is what Carlson Bier consistently delivers for every client we represent.

You’ve come a long way in understanding dog bite laws and legal avenues within Illinois. Don’t let question marks swirling around potential compensation keep you up at night. We invite you to click on the button below, utilize our insightful online tool now and discover how much your case could be worth! Remember – obtaining rightful compensation signifies an integral part of recovery post such distressing incidents; further amplified for us because ‘Your Recovery Is Our Reward’.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Westville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Westville

Areas of Practice in Westville

Cycling Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Providing adept legal support for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Medical Carelessness

Ensuring dedicated legal support for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Responsibility

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, supplying adept legal services to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Neglect

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Fall Mishaps

Expert in managing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking justice for their losses.

Birth Wounds

Extending legal guidance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Accidents: Devoted to guiding clients of car accidents gain equitable recompense for hurts and losses.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal services for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Accident

Extending professional legal support for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for losses.

Building Mishaps

Concentrated on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cognitive Traumas

Dedicated to offering expert legal advice for persons suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in tackling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and expert legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Impairment

Committed to assisting persons with paralysis, offering specialized legal services to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer