...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Westville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experience significant peace of mind with Carlson Bier, your foremost defenders against medical malpractice. As an established attorney group in Illinois, we are tenacious advocates for victims seeking to hold those accountable for negligent medical behavior. Medical malpractice is a complex legal field; you deserve the meticulous expertise of our experienced attorneys who comprehend its intricacies thoroughly. Each case delves deep into painstaking research and keen investigative work to deliver amplified voices within courtrooms and negotiations alike. Carlson Bier champions comprehensive solutions regardless of circumstance complexity or hardship gravity – bearing substantial settlements reflecting damage extents appropriately.

Why choose us? Population size doesn’t determine our commitment intensity rather it magnifies it! Precisely why clients from communities such as Westville favor our services over others, serving as testament to our unmatched dedication amidst flourishing praise echoing through Illinois State’s corridors.

Distinctive quality lies at the heart of every action at Carlson Bier—we understand that situations involve not just facing bureaucratic giants but also reconnecting shattered personal aspects post-trauma; hence they all occupy equal importance on proactive measures compiling holistic results- that’s the overriding promise embedded in each interaction with us at Carlson Bier; your ally in medical malpractice battles!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Westville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with a focus on Medical Malpractice claims. As an Illinois-based legal firm deeply committed to our clients’ rights and well-being, we understand the emotional distress and financial burden that a serious injury can cause. Navigating through medical malpractice cases can be challenging as they require comprehensive understanding of both legal aspects and medical negligence specifics. That’s why our primary mission is to provide you with personalized assistance, extensive expertise, and dogged determination when advocating for your legal justice.

Medical malpractice occurs when any health care professional or facility deviates from standard practices in their field causing harm to the patient as a result of negligent actions or lack thereof. This could include misdiagnosis, improper treatment, failure to treat, delay in treatment or surgical errors among others. What makes these cases particularly complex is the requirement of clear demonstration that this deviation from standards directly led to the patient’s injury.

Key features of successful medical malpractice claims involve:

• Proving a doctor-patient relationship existed.

• Demonstrating how standard care was not provided by identifying what appropriate treatment should have been under similar circumstances.

• Highlighting how this breach in standard led directly to your injury.

• Presenting evidence of actual harm or damages resulting such as physical pain, mental anguish loss of wages or earning capacity or excessive medical bills due to further treatments.

To secure favorable outcomes in such intricate settings it becomes crucially important for you rely on experienced professionals specialized in this field who can dissect these points effectively on your behalf.

And at Carlson Bier we do exactly that; defend your rights assertively with utmost dedication while keeping empathy at heart.

Our legal experts take time comprehending each client individually understanding their concerns and requirement before developing custom strategies tailored specifically towards their unique situations.Our team meticulously investigates every facet gathering evidential support ensuring every loop hole is cogently covered for presenting strong hard-hitting arguments.

We are not limited to only medical malpractice cases. Personal injuries don’t just limit themselves to just one category and neither do we. Our professional commitment extends beyond into an array of personal injury law services such as motor vehicle accidents, wrongful deaths, worker’s compensation and product liabilities amongst others. We ensure the same level of determination, expert representation and pursuit for justice are maintained equally across all our service areas.

Remember, as a victim of any form of medical negligence or malpractice you have legal rights in Illinois that allow you to claim for damages deliberately inflicted.Parleying these rights successfully requires skilled understanding of legal nuances which is effectively facilitated by specialist lawyers at Carlson Bier.We shoulder your battles helping you reclaim what’s rightfully yours every step along the way. Compensation cannot undo the emotional trauma or physical pain but it can help alleviate some financial pressures and aid recovery.

Your trust in us equates serving justice for us. Don’t feel overwhelmed with uncertainty about your case worth.Carlson Bier offers free, no-obligation consultations where we assess your situation providing insights into possible outcome while also determining estimated value based on various factors specific to individual cases.All without any up-front fees unless successful results are obtained.Don’t delay reaching out further.Click on the button below right now! Find out how much your case is potentially worth today.Empowered with this knowledge take control back steering towards brighter healing horizons.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Westville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Westville

Areas of Practice in Westville

Cycling Accidents

Proficient in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Burns

Giving adept legal help for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Carelessness

Ensuring expert legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Accountability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, supplying professional legal support to customers affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Tumble Mishaps

Skilled in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Damages

Providing legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting sufferers of car accidents secure equitable compensation for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Incidents

Specializing in providing legal services for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Trucking Incident

Delivering experienced legal services for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for damages.

Worksite Incidents

Focused on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Neurological Harms

Expert in ensuring dedicated legal assistance for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Harms

Skilled in tackling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unfair Demise

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and experienced legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Harm

Dedicated to advocating for individuals with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​