Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Wheeling

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Consider the possibility of a pedestrian accident occurring in Wheeling; a looming danger, indeed. The services of an expert personal injury lawyer such as Carlson Bier are invaluable during such trying times. Having accumulated extensive experience in dealing with Pedestrian Accident cases within Illinois state boundaries, our team has proven their exceptional proficiency and commitment toward seeking justice for victims. Navigating through legal hurdles can be daunting without proficient guidance – that’s where we step into the scene to alleviate your stress and cultivate hope amid adversity. Our empathetic approach combined with aggressive litigation abilities make us uniquely qualified to champion your rights while holding accountable parties responsible for their actions. We aim to get you maximum compensation so that you can dedicate yourself fully towards recovering both physically and emotionally from this significant ordeal instead of worrying about legal matters . Trust in Carlson Bier’s pursuit of standing up against negligence on behalf identifiably innocent pedestrians greatly affected by unintended collisions or careless driving habits is paramount value which defines us amongst our competitors in Illinois landscape, ensuring optimal case outcomes every time.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Wheeling Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a highly experienced and dedicated group of personal injury attorneys based in Illinois specializing in helping victims of pedestrian accidents receive their due compensation. But what is a pedestrian accident? A pedestrian accident occurs when there’s an unfortunate collision between a motor vehicle and a person who was walking or running on the road or sidewalk. These accidents can result in serious injuries including but not limited to broken bones, internal injuries, brain damage or even fatalities.

As your trusted Illinois legal support team, our main objective at Carlson Bier is to educate you about the rights and legalities involved with pedestrian accidents. We believe that understanding these crucial points will help you build a strong case if you ever become a victim:

• Right Of Way:

In majority circumstances under Illinois law, motorists are required by law to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians crossing streets in marked crosswalks.

• Comparative Negligence:

The fault isn’t always entirely on one party. If both parties (the driver and the pedestrian) were negligent and contributed towards creating the accident situation, it falls under comparative negligence.

• Duty of Due Care:

Pedestrians also have a duty of reasonable care for their own safety. Their reckless actions such as darting into traffic without looking could lead them to be found partially or completely at fault for resulting injuries.

If individuals do become victims of such traumas caused by other’s negligence, they have every right to seek legal recourse.

The role Carlson Bier plays here is simplifying complex laws into comprehensible guidance which helps support your claim effectively. Our approach involves several critical steps. First off we aim at understanding each unique detail about your case – “Was it during broad daylight? Was there any alcohol influence?”, etc., All these factors need careful examination as they contribute heavily towards determining the strength of your case.

After this stage comes negotiating with insurance companies; no easy task considering how they’re typically not in favor of full compensation. Rest assured, our practiced Illinois personal injury lawyers come prepared with skills honed over years practicing law to ensure you get the maximum possible settlement.

In case negotiations do not garner satisfactory results, we’re ready and fully equipped to take your case to court. Our methodical preparation both facts-wise and strategy-wise ensures that we present a compelling case for you – fighting steadfastly for your rights and justified reimbursement.

Surviving a pedestrian accident can lead to physical injuries as well severe emotional distress, leaving victims reeling under medical costs while grappling with mental health fallouts. At Carlson Bier, we strive towards ensuring these struggles are addressed legally at least – securing rightful damages for loss of wages due to inability to work, pain & suffering endured because of consequential trauma, or even wrongful death claims pertaining to pedestrian accidents.

Our dedication is deeply rooted in the belief that all pedestrians have the right to safety on roads just as how motor vehicle drivers do; every client who walks (or rolls through) our doors is guaranteed thorough legal representation regardless of age, type of injury or degree of fault involved.

At Carlson Bier, our acknowledged expertise combined with empathetic approach assures that each pedestrian accident victim receives comprehensive support along their challenging journey. We invite you now – feel free click on the button provided below if you wish find out what your individual Pedestrian Accident claim could fetch you monetarily or simply seek further clarification about your doubts from us directly.We promise complete confidentiality coupled with competent advice tailored uniquely for you.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wheeling Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Wheeling

Areas of Practice in Wheeling

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Proficient in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Burn Damages

Extending expert legal assistance for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Malpractice

Delivering specialist legal services for clients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Managing cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal services to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Slip Incidents

Adept in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Birth Injuries

Supplying legal assistance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Crashes: Concentrated on assisting clients of car accidents get reasonable recompense for hurts and damages.

Motorcycle Accidents

Expert in providing legal advice for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Big Rig Accident

Ensuring specialist legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for harms.

Construction Site Crashes

Engaged in assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Impairments

Focused on ensuring specialized legal assistance for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at dealing with cases for victims who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Death

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and experienced legal support to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Harm

Dedicated to advocating for individuals with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer