...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Wilsonville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be distressful, both physically and emotionally. It’s crucial to have legal assistance that is committed, experienced, and empathetic; characteristics we take pride in embodying at Carlson Bier. If you’re located in Wilsonville and need insightful advice on a Dog Bite Injuries claim, our team of specialists stands ready to assist. With thorough understanding of Illinois’ specific regulations related to these incidents, we aim for resolutions prioritizing your welfare. Numerous clients entrust their complex cases with us not only because of our expertise but also due to our commitment towards dedicated personalized service- each case handled with precision and sensitivity it deserves.Ought you seek great outcomes without compromise? Then let the seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier come alongside you during this challenging time & tirelessly advocate for your rights. As competent navigators through Illinois’ exhaustive laws pertaining Dog Bite Injuries cases- trust that your justice will never sink beneath technicalities when managed by Caldwell Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Wilsonville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we provide expert legal representation to those who’ve suffered dog bite injuries. We pride ourselves on being Illinois-based specialists with vast experience and a deep understanding of related laws about these traumatic incidents.

Dog bites can result in severe physical harm and overwhelming emotional distress. The aftermath often involves substantial medical bills for treatment and therapy that may include surgeries, vaccinations, cosmetic reconstruction, psychological counseling and physical therapy. Moreover, many victims require time away from work to recover fully, leading to economic stress due to lost wages.

Statewide data indicates thousands of people are bitten by dogs each year in Illinois. According to statutes, dog owners bear strict liability for any damages their pets may cause if the animal attacks or injures someone without provocation while they are peacefully conducting themselves in a location lawfully. When you or your loved ones become victims of such an unanticipated eventuality creating undue pain, it’s crucial you understand how dedicated attorneys like those at Carlson Bier can help seek the compensation you deserve.

• UNDERSTANDING LIABILITY: In Illinois, being mere negligent is not a prerequisite for holding the pet owner liable unless it falls under specific local regulations enforced where the incident occurred.

• SCHOLARSHIP OF ILLINOIS DOG LAWS: Decoding legalese can be difficult for laymen; our experienced lawyers effortlessly translate complicated legal language into simple terms.

• EXPERT REPRESENTATION: Our attorneys have handled numerous cases thus offer expert guidance during what could otherwise be daunting negotiation processes with insurance companies.

• PERSONALIZED ATTENTION: Every case brings its unique circumstances consequently requiring individual assessment. At Carlson Bier, every client receives customized advice from dedicated professionals throughout their process.

Apart from seeking reimbursement expenses directly ascribable to the injury sustained like hospital expenditure or property damage if applicable; suffering and agony endured should equally get factored into punitive claims since these episodes disrupt lives drastically emotionally as well physically causing notable disarray.

Moreover, Illinois’s unique Statute of Limitations stipulates a two-year timeframe starting from the injury date to file any related lawsuit. Consequently, time is of essence; reaching out to qualified attorneys promptly helps initiate timely proceedings for claims against culpable parties thereby ensuring apt retribution.

The repercussions following dog bite injuries are far-reaching; as one navigates this daunting journey towards recovery, dependable legal guidance forms an invaluable ally. Trusted by an extensive clientele in Illinois Carlson Bier boasts a strong legacy advocating tirelessly for victims seeking justice. Leveraging our proficiency within this niche we diligently monitor evolving jurisprudence assuring our clients stay ahead strategically while confidently dealing with adversities arising from such personal injury cases.

While no amount can truly compensate for the traumatic impact endured from these experiences, obtaining due financial relief does lighten some burdens off victims’ shoulders. If faced with dog bite injuries and considering steps ahead in terms of pursuing requisite compensation look no further than Carlson Bier – the champions fighting unflinchingly through uncertainty and confusion creating paths toward resolution aligning your interest.

Navigating rights after sustaining dog bites doesn’t have to be overwhelming; let us shoulder those troubles on your behalf. We’d invite you now, without obligation, to utilize the interactive feature below calculating preliminary estimations about what your claim could potentially secure financially. This confidential tool may help simplify decision-making processes confronting potential plaintiffs post-dog-bite injuries offering them prescient insights into their position whilst exploring legal avenues available hereunder the Illinois Dog Bite Laws. Click the button below now to see how much your case could worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wilsonville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Wilsonville

Areas of Practice in Wilsonville

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering skilled legal help for people of grave burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Delivering experienced legal support for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving unsafe products, extending expert legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Stumble Injuries

Expert in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking compensation for their harm.

Birth Injuries

Delivering legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Crashes

Accidents: Concentrated on assisting patients of car accidents receive fair compensation for harms and impairment.

Scooter Mishaps

Expert in providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Trucking Mishap

Extending specialist legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Construction Mishaps

Committed to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Head Injuries

Focused on delivering compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Adept at managing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unjust Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and expert legal representation to ensure justice.

Backbone Impairment

Focused on assisting individuals with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​