...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Winchester

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered from a dog bite injury in Winchester, reaching out to the experienced lawyers of Carlson Bier is absolutely essential. Our team of professionals specializes specifically in incidents involving injuries caused by animals, particularly dog bites. We fully understand that these animal attacks can inflict severe physical and emotional damages, thus making our main objective securing the maximum compensation for our clients. Armed with an extensive knowledge of Illinois state laws pertaining to pet owner responsibilities and liabilities, we are well-equipped to navigate complex legal claims related to dog bites. Carlson Bier prides itself on offering compassionate representation while aggressively advocating for your rights during these trying times. Our attorneys’ combined experience and dedication assure approachability along with excellent results aiding rapid recovery for our clients affected by such unfortunate incidents within Winchester area boundaries. Trusting Carlson Bier means trusting not just the best personal injury lawyers but also safeguarding your post-incident life ensuring it’s handled most sensitively yet effectively under such circumstances.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Winchester Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to delivering proven legal guidance and compassionate support for our clients suffering from personal injuries, particularly those caused by dog bite incidents. As a renowned personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, we possess an in-depth understanding of the state’s specific laws pertaining to dog bites and other animal attacks. It is essential to share that every year, Illinois ranks highly among states with the most reported cases of severe dog bite injuries. Such instances result not only in physical harm but also psychological trauma that can last a lifetime.

In light of this harsh reality, realizing your rights as a victim under Illinois law is crucial. The State operates under the ‘strict liability’ rule when involving dog bite cases. Essentially, this means that regardless of whether a dog has shown previous aggression or if it is its first biting incident, the owner is legally responsible for any injury caused. This factual claim stands true unless they prove you provoked their pet or were unlawfully on their premises at the time of the attack.

While dealing with such situations often seems daunting, having seasoned experts like us at Carlson Bier makes a significant difference in navigating these emotional times and complex legal pathways. Of particular importance are several critical steps:

• Seek immediate medical attention: Dog bites pose risks beyond visible wounds as they may transmit diseases.

• Document your injuries: Photographs can serve as solid proof of severity.

• Report promptly: Connect with local authorities and submit an accurate account.

• Consult professional help: Secure expert representation early on for direct negotiation with insurance companies.

Understanding common defenses by opposing sides during dog bite claims helps build strong case strategies. Typical defensive angles utilized include arguing trespassing or provocation – both being scenarios where strict laws do not apply.

The outcome of pursuing compensation largely depends on the skilled crafting and strategic execution of your case; thus delicately banking upon experienced hands matters incredibly. At Carlson Bier, we remain devoted to ensuring each client’s rights get upheld and that they obtain the necessary compensation to cover medical bills, lost wages, as well as pain and suffering.

Possessing over decades of categorical expertise in handling dog bite injury claims has rewarded Carlson Bier with an exceptional track record. We combine our legal prowess with a client-centered approach – acknowledging the value of empathetic guidance through such tumultuous times. Our comprehensive support extends well beyond courtroom walls; it extends towards helping those affected heal not just legally but also emotionally, bringing about holistic recovery measures.

Every individual’s circumstances are unique when dealing with personal injuries like dog bites. The physical and emotional toll can be considerable, making your journey towards justice challenging yet essential for complete healing. With this understanding at heart, we tailor-fit every strategy to each client – their story becomes our responsibility until fair resolution is attained.

So whether you or someone you know has unfortunately become a victim of a vicious dog attack, remember that there is help available to assert your right under Illinois law. Discover more about your entitlements as a victim by seeking expert representation from Carlson Bier dedicated personnel who understand what you are going through on both legal and emotional fronts.

Boldly take your first stride toward justice by discovering what proper compensation paves way for future security following such traumatic incidents. Confidence in getting back on track starts here – Click on the button below to find out how much your case could be worth based on professional insights drawn from years of winning experiences in managing dog bite injury cases within Illinois state guidelines at Carlson Bier.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Winchester Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Winchester

Areas of Practice in Winchester

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Expert in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or perilous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Providing professional legal help for people of intense burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Physician Malpractice

Delivering specialist legal services for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Responsibility

Handling cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal guidance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Fall Accidents

Adept in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking restitution for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Extending legal assistance for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Incidents

Crashes: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents gain appropriate recompense for hurts and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Big Rig Accident

Offering expert legal assistance for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for harms.

Construction Incidents

Concentrated on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cerebral Traumas

Dedicated to providing specialized legal support for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Skilled in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unjust Loss

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and experienced legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Committed to representing persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​