...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Windsor

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When navigating the complexities of a dog bite injury case, individuals in Windsor need legal representation marked by proficiency and attentiveness. The Carlson Bier firm welcomes such demands with their exceptional reputation in handling these delicate situations throughout Illinois. Our team comprises seasoned personal injury attorneys who have defended and championed countless victims of dog-related injuries. Leveraging substantial knowledge about local and state-wide legal standards, we are adept at decoding minute details to ascertain your rightful compensation accurately. We believe every victim deserves unbiased access to justice; hence with Carlson Bier, rest assured you will receive premier-level expertise without compromising on personalized care. Going beyond mere legal representation, our approach prioritizes your healing by tackling the stressful bits of litigation while you recover peaceably from trauma—physical or psychological—in ideal environs like Windsor’s serene surroundings. For these reasons amongst others, choosing Carlson Bier for any dog-bite-related lawsuit ensures you benefit from our strategic acumen whilst capitalizing on jurisdictions across Illinois that bode well for clients’ interests.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Windsor Illinois

The law offices of Carlson Bier, rooted in the heartland of Illinois, stand firm as an uncompromising advocate for victims of personal injury cases – particularly those involving dog bite injuries. We understand that such incidents can result in serious physical and emotional trauma. Through our long-standing commitment to aiding individuals navigate these complex issues, we impart balanced legal insight paired with compassionate client care.

Dog bites are a deeply distressing type of injury and occur more frequently than you might expect. In fact, according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), about 4.5 million Americans are bitten by dogs each year, half of which involve children aged 5-9 years old. These injuries not only cause physical harm but often leave deep psychological scars that persist far longer than the visible wounds themselves.

Here at Carlson Bier, we emphasize several essential points regarding dog bite injuries: They can lead to significant medical expenses due to potentially lasting damage to muscles or bones; they may necessitate ongoing psychological therapy due to trauma; they could induce loss of income if your ability work is impaired following the incident; and they may engender other unexpected costs such as reconstructive surgery or rehabilitation efforts.

Under Illinois law – specifically under the Animal Control Act – it should be noted that a victim does not need to prove negligence on part of the animal’s owner to receive compensation for a dog-bite related injury. The Act states clearly: “If a dog or other animal attacks or injures any person who is peaceably conducting himself in any place where he may lawfully be, the owner of said dog or animal is liable…to said injured person.”

What this implies is that as long as you did not provoke the animal or unlawfully enter private property, you have strong grounds for financial recovery following a canine-inflicted injury. This extends even further: The right encompasses delivery persons traversing private property during their regular rounds.

It’s important to recognize that time is of the essence following dog bite incidents. In Illinois, you typically have only two years to file a lawsuit against the animal’s owner – right from the date of injury.

Carlson Bier provides crucial assistance in these matters by diligently documenting your medical expenses, gathering evidence, and conducting detailed investigations when necessary. With our robust understanding of local legislature and an unwavering commitment to client care, it is our goal to offset this distressing experience with an optimal legal outcome for you.

Navigating through personal injury cases can be challenging and often confusing but Carlson Bier is here every step of the way. As evidenced by numerous positive case outcomes and grateful client testimonials, we take pride in providing reliable representation built on integrity, accessibility, and effective communication.

Everyone deserves fair restitution after such an unfortunate incident. To provide accessible guidance for potential clients like you—those who may feel overwhelmed—we offer a free initial consultation session which allows us to understand your specific situation better while also allowing you to get comfortable with our team before moving forward.

Finally, if you’ve faced a traumatic dog-bite incident or other animal-related injuries in Illinois and are grappling with mounting expenses as well as emotional turmoil – it’s time to empower yourself legally! You shouldn’t needlessly shoulder financial burdens stemming from someone else’s negligence or irresponsibility concerning their pet.

Instead trust the knowledgeable team at Carlson Bier–personal injury attorneys who truly understand both sides of such complex issues—to guide you towards satisfactory resolution.

For more information about how much your case could be worth click on the button below; allow us leverage our expertise for your benefit—and together we’ll attain justice!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Windsor Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Windsor

Areas of Practice in Windsor

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Scald Damages

Extending expert legal advice for victims of major burn injuries caused by accidents or indifference.

Physician Misconduct

Delivering experienced legal representation for patients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Obligation

Managing cases involving unsafe products, extending expert legal help to customers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Malpractice

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Slip Incidents

Skilled in handling trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking compensation for their losses.

Infant Damages

Supplying legal assistance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Crashes: Dedicated to aiding victims of car accidents receive fair recompense for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal advice for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Truck Incident

Providing professional legal assistance for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for losses.

Worksite Accidents

Dedicated to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Neurological Harms

Expert in offering dedicated legal assistance for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Expertise in dealing with cases for people who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Dedicated to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unfair Death

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and skilled legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spine Impairment

Focused on advocating for victims with paralysis, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer