FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Winthrop Harbor

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with Dog Bite Injuries, it’s crucial to have expert legal guidance. Carlson Bier understands the real-life implications of these incidents in Winthrop Harbor and is uniquely equipped to manage dog bite injury cases effectively. Our attorney group practices a meticulous approach in all litigation stages, from information gathering to full representation at trial. With a comprehensive understanding of Illinois law, our lawyers deliver attention-to-detail that drastically improves your chances for fair compensation. We navigate the unique variables that influence these specific personal injury cases ensuring your rights are upheld throughout the process. Whether you’re embarking on an intimidating claim journey or maybe stalled due to complex jargon and procedures, let us offer support and assistance needed during this challenging time.

What sets Carlson Bier apart? It’s commitment; our relentless dedication toward securing positive outcomes for those affected by traumatic dog bites situations ensures we put infinite effort into every case. Trust us as your empathetic, knowledgeable accomplice who will stand tall beside you until justice has been served rightfully.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Winthrop Harbor Illinois

Dog bite injuries can have a potentially traumatic impact on a victim’s life. Mounting medical bills, the physical pain, and emotional distress can combine to create an overwhelming series of challenges. Severe dog bite injuries may require extensive medical treatment including surgeries, rehabilitation and counseling. However, as daunting as these issues might initially seem, you are not alone in this ordeal; Carlson Bier is here to provide comprehensive legal services if you or a loved one has been bitten by a dog in Illinois.

Laws concerning dog bites vary from state to state but in Illinois, the owner of the animal is held responsible if their pet injures someone without provocation. Specifically under Section 5/16 of the Illinois Animal Control Act (ACA), it is stated that “If a dog or other animal, without provocation, attacks … and causes an injury to or kills any person who is peaceably conducting himself … the owner of such dog or other animal is liable in civil damages to such person”.

Why choose Carlson Bier? Here are some unique points making our firm stand out:

• Proven experience: With hundreds of successful cases behind us regarding personal injuries inflicted by dogs

• Knowledgeable specialists: Our strategy begins with consolidating expert analysis backed up by years of specialization

• No win-no fees guarantee: We don’t take anything until we win your case

As professionals committed to justice for victims of personal injury we will guide you through every step from analyzing your case meticulously to ensuring complete documentation.

Medical costs associated with treatment following a dog bite attack could include hospitalization fees , long-term therapy costs and medication expenses among others. Moreover lost wages due to inability to work during recovery period could further compound financial hardship faced . At Carlson Bier we understand these layers complexities facing clients hence strive not only get compensation for current losses incurred but planning future needs caused permanent disability scarring psychological trauma resulting incident .

One pertinent detail often overlooked crucial role Illinois statute limitations pertaining bite injury claims which is two years according filing lawsuit against dog owner . Failure within timeframe could risk losing right pursue legal redress we here at Carlson Bier ensure timelines are honored .

Furthermore understanding of intricacies involved in holding accountable negligent parties beyond immediate owners, such as landlords or caretakers who might be partially responsible for allowing situation arise, enables us provide comprehensive assistance navigate murky waters legal accountability.

Before getting caught up in the labyrinth of legalese that typically arrises after a traumatic experience like a dog bite attack, take solace knowing that the professionals at Carlson Bier will utilize their expertise and resources to help you secure maximum compensation. Navigating legal channels can often seem intimidating. No matter how complex your case may appear initially, our lawyers are dedicated to presenting understandable explanations tailored to your individual scenario whilst devising optimal strategies for each unique circumstance.

If you’ve been bitten by a dog and have questions about where to go from there, turn now to the experts—Carlson Bier. We hope you found this content valuable and informative. To learn more and for actionable advice on what steps should be taken following such an incident, kindly click on the button below. Discover how much your case might be worth with one our trusted attorneys today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Winthrop Harbor Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Winthrop Harbor

Areas of Practice in Winthrop Harbor

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or perilous conditions.

Fire Damages

Supplying specialist legal support for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Extending dedicated legal representation for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Obligation

Handling cases involving problematic products, offering skilled legal support to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Abuse

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Tumble Occurrences

Adept in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Traumas

Extending legal help for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Collisions

Accidents: Focused on supporting patients of car accidents get reasonable payout for damages and damages.

Motorcycle Collisions

Committed to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Big Rig Incident

Providing professional legal support for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Dedicated to advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Neurological Injuries

Focused on delivering dedicated legal advice for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Wounds

Adept at tackling cases for clients who have suffered damages from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Focused on legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Fatality

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and experienced legal assistance to ensure redress.

Backbone Damage

Committed to representing patients with paralysis, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440