...

Burn Injuries in Witt

Burn Injuries Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

The devastating effects of burn injuries can transform lives in an instant, requiring not only immediate medical care but also substantial long-term treatment. Dealings with the legal complexities of such an accident shouldn’t compound this strain. At Illinois-based Carlson Bier, our seasoned attorneys focus exclusively on personal injury law, particularly burn injuries. As experts in representing victims of these severe traumas irrespective of their location, we bring unparalleled dedication to our clients’ cases while striving for optimum outcomes. What sets us apart is our meticulous approach and commitment to meticulously understand each case’s unique circumstances, enabling us to effectively advocate for you during the negotiation or litigation processes. We acknowledge that scars run deeper than skin – it’s about your future quality of life and ensuring fair compensation as a basis for rebuilding without financial worry. Arguably deemed one valuable choice when looking at Burn Injuries attorney options throughout Illinois territory; trust Carlson Bier as your proactive partner towards claims justice

About Carlson Bier

Burn Injuries Lawyers in Witt Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the disruptive effects and devastating aftermath of a burn injury. Our devoted team of personal injury lawyers in Illinois stands at the ready to navigate you through the complex process of filing a lawsuit. Every blaze is unique, as are its victims, but our steadfast commitment to offering support and diligent service remains consistent irrespective of your circumstances.

Burn injuries could range from mild first-degree burns that impact only the skin’s outer layer to fatal fourth-degree burns penetrating deep into bones and muscles. They could result from different sources such as thermal (fires or steam), chemical (acid or alkali burns), electrical (plugging in appliances or high voltage wires), and radiation (x-ray or UV rays). Victims may suffer persistent pain, impairment, disfigurement, rigorous therapy sessions alongside financial strain imposed by mounting medical bills.

• First degree burns: These superficial burns affect just the top layer of skin causing redness and discomfort.

• Second-degree burns: Penetrating deeper, these burns cause damage not only to the epidermis but also partway into the dermis beneath, resulting in blistering.

• Third-degree burns: Transpiring when flames engulf all layers of skin down to underlying tissues; this severe type poses potential complications like smoke inhalation damage.

• Fourth-degree burns: The most catastrophic kind leading often to charring with fire consuming everything down to muscle or bone—the aftermath typically involves significant surgeries coupled with extensive physical therapy.

A crucial factor not within public knowledge is that Illinois law permits victims to pursue compensation for damages beyond mere hospital charges. Tangible losses like loss of earnings if you’re unable to work post-accident can count towards your claim total as well as non-economic hardships imposed by factors like emotional distress—something prevalent among burn victims due substantial alterations in appearance.

While litigation may seem daunting especially amidst attempts at recovery from such a life-altering incident—removing monetary worries allows room for essential focus on recuperation. As experienced personal injury lawyers, we at Carlson Bier isolate pertinent elements ranging from medical records to eyewitness testimonies in order to manufacture a solid case destined for success.

Establishing blame is fundamental in ensuring your rightful compensation. Responsibility may lie firmly on one individual or can be shared amongst multiple parties involved—it could perhaps implicate an entity too such as the company manufacturing an appliance accountable for the mishap. At times, victims themselves bear a degree of fault—an aspect allowed consideration under Illinois’s comparative fault rule wherein you may still obtain damages reduced proportionally according based upon your percentage liability assigned.

We shoulder these burdens so you don’t have to—much like how no minute details escape our calculated exploration of every potential resource liable for recompense—we never overlook essential features that multiply claim values sparing you undue stress during already trying times.

A quality representative does more than just provide legal counsel – they offer solidarity and belief – showcasing genuine concern towards clients’ welfare and optimal outcome of their lawsuits. This embodies Carlson Bier’s unwavering purpose; we take immense pride in guarding rights along with securing fair treatment and utmost remuneration due deserved by burn injuries sufferers aiding them brave harrowing journey back to normalcy.

No plight should go unaccounted, especially those inflicted by preventable accidents owing to another’s disregard— employ our sturdy players championing your corner whilst ensuring transgressors are aptly admonished inspiring deterrence against similar future happenings safeguarding others alongside you in the process.

Our relentless pursuit spans decades with a prodigious portfolio laden with robust success stories—a legacy founded on trust exuding skill set considered peerless within this intricate arena—Carlson and Bier continue churning out victorious cases thanks largely attributable due dedicated commitment towards achieving justice mirrored by irreplaceable assistance simultaneously extended epitomizing advocacy at its apex.

For prospective clients seeking top-tier representation equipped intensely seasoned in guiding countless clients to significant settlements remarkably compensating for the suffering thrust upon them while grappling with personal devastation of burn-related injuries, look no further—drop us a line today and let’s explore potential timelines besides discussing subsequent steps. You’ve made it this far; take that first leap towards recuperation. Click on the button below to find out how much your case is worth.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Witt Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Burn Accident FAQ​

There are three main types of burn injuries:

  • First-degree burns: These burns affect the outer layer of skin, the epidermis. They cause redness, pain, and swelling.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns affect the epidermis and the dermis, the second layer of skin. They cause redness, pain, swelling, and blistering.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns destroy the epidermis and the dermis, and can also damage the underlying tissues. They cause white, leathery, or charred skin.

Burn injuries can be caused by a variety of factors, including:

  • Heat: This includes flames, hot liquids, steam, and hot objects.
  • Electricity: Electrical burns can be caused by contact with live wires or outlets.
  • Chemicals: Chemical burns can be caused by exposure to acids, alkalis, and other corrosive substances.
  • Radiation: Radiation burns can be caused by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays from the sun or to other types of radiation.

The signs and symptoms of a burn injury will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Redness
  • Pain
  • Swelling
  • Blistering
  • Charred skin
  • Difficulty breathing
  • Shock

The treatment options for burn injuries will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common treatment options include:

  • First-degree burns: These burns typically heal on their own within a few days. However, it is important to keep the area clean and moist.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns may need to be treated with medication or surgery.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns typically require surgery and skin grafts.

.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit if your burn injury was caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person or party. A burn injury lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Witt

Areas of Practice in Witt

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Extending skilled legal help for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Healthcare Malpractice

Delivering specialist legal support for victims affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Responsibility

Managing cases involving dangerous products, delivering professional legal help to individuals affected by defective items.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Stumble Incidents

Adept in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking compensation for their suffering.

Birth Harms

Delivering legal help for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Collisions

Accidents: Focused on guiding clients of car accidents obtain equitable payout for damages and losses.

Motorbike Crashes

Expert in providing legal advice for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Semi Crash

Extending experienced legal representation for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Building Site Incidents

Concentrated on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Harms

Dedicated to ensuring expert legal assistance for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at dealing with cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unfair Loss

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Focused on advocating for persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer