Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Wonder Lake

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a dog bite injury in Wonder Lake? Seeking immediate legal assistance from an experienced personal injury lawyer is not just crucial, it’s indispensable. This is where Carlson Bier law firm outshines as the gold standard for dedicated representation. Anchor your trust in our proven track record of settlements and verdicts obtained, backed by decades of experience in handling numerous dog bite injuries cases across Illinois state lines. Masterful tactics employed by insurance companies are no match for our fierce advocacy & exceptional understanding of claim denials and dispute resolution mechanisms within the sphere of dog bite laws – elevating us among premier attorney groups serving victims throughout Wonder Lake region with assured professionalism & relentless pursuit for justice. At Carlson Bier, we empathize – turning life-altering traumas into victorious testimonies through expedient litigation processes while emphasizing transparency at every turn – treating clients’ rights to full compensation paramount above all else! Reach out today to still those trembling hands with the sturdiness that only Carlson Bier can offer.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Wonder Lake Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your dependable personal injury law firm located right here in Illinois. Our specialty is providing a robust defense for victims of various forms of personal injuries which encompasses an array of accidents and mishaps. Notably amongst these are incidents involving Dog Bite Injuries—a difficult situation that not only inflicts physical harm but can potentially have lasting emotional scars.

Dog Bite Injuries account for a significant proportion of personal injury cases in Illinois. It’s crucial to understand the specifics attached to this unique category of personal injury law due its inherent complexity and stringency—in terms fostering evidence substantiation and legal proceedings. At Carlson Bier, our seasoned attorneys bring rigor, competence and an unwavering dedication in championing your rights as a victim ensuring you receive deserving restitution.

Here’s what you should know about Dog Bite Injuries:

– Liability: As per Illinois laws, dog owners are virtually always held liable when their dogs cause harm or endanger someone without provocation; irrespective if it’s the first instance their pet has acted aggressively.

– Strict vs Negligent Standards: Wisconsin adopts strict liability standards while many states adopt the negligent rule hoping dog owners would demonstrate higher caution—Illinois too follows this strict liability approach.

– Determining Provocation: A critical determinant factor impacting claims revolves around establishing whether the victim provoked the animal causing the attack.

– Statute limitations: The State provides a two-year window from incident date for victims to file lawsuits against offending parties.

At Carlson Bier, we earnestly believe that understanding what options exist post such traumatic encounters helps alleviate some burden off victims—who are oftentimes left grappling with mounting medical bills, loss wages due working inability during recovery phase or dealing psychological turmoil. We provide expert guidance tailored to your specific circumstances—armed with years of exposure handling intricate variable challenges linked with successfully settling dog bite injury cases.

When navigating through this overwhelming period, having seasoned experts like us advocating on your behalf ensures that your rights are protected. We’re tough negotiators aiming to press insurance companies into delivering just compensations, but if trials become necessary rest assured—we’re ready and equipped to fight for your cause in court.

Recovering from Dog Bite Injuries can be daunting—physically, emotionally and financially. It’s crucial though not to let these adversities deter you from seeking deserved justice. Remember, the law’s designed empowering victims ensuring recourse deliverance;and while emotional recovery may take a while, financial relief necessary to aid this process can ease burdens considerably.

If person or loved ones have experienced canine attacks causing significant bodily harm—know Carlson Bier is here standing alongside lending expert legal support and aid during these difficult times. Our team is resolute–dedicated relentlessly fighting for achieving best outcomes possible leveraging our legal expertise that spans decades of practice along with an unyielding opportunities pursuit providing gratifying results.

Final Thought:

Understanding intricacies involving componential aspects relative to diverse personal injury claims often end up being cumbersome for most people. That’s why we at Carlson Bier strive simplifying this process by breaking down complex approaches then applying them effectively catering specifically towards individual claimant situations.

Recognize one elemental truth—an early consultation with legal professionals possessing precision-based knowledge relevant implementing tailored strategies optimizes realizing rightful compensation rewards thus aiding expedient recovery periods eventually helping resume normal life routines sooner. So why wait? Uncover claim potentiality today! Click on the button below AND find how much your dog bite injury case might potentially be worth NOW! Trust us—you’ll only realize true happiness once you’ve comprehensively been compensated for all suffered economic and non-economic damages resulting due someone else’s negligence’.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wonder Lake Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Wonder Lake

Areas of Practice in Wonder Lake

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Proficient in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Supplying expert legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Hospital Negligence

Offering dedicated legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Responsibility

Handling cases involving problematic products, supplying adept legal assistance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall & Fall Incidents

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking redress for their suffering.

Newborn Wounds

Supplying legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Mishaps: Focused on helping sufferers of car accidents gain fair compensation for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Trucking Collision

Providing specialist legal representation for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for harms.

Worksite Crashes

Focused on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Cognitive Traumas

Expert in providing dedicated legal support for patients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Damages

Specialized in tackling cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Committed to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unjust Death

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and adept legal representation to ensure justice.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in advocating for clients with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer