Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Wood Dale

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Facing a dog bite injury can be distressing, not only physically but emotionally. The repercussions can extend beyond immediate hospital bills to include ongoing medical expenses and psychological trauma. Carlson Bier steps in precisely here – guiding you through these complex terrains of law while escalating the justice deserved for your sufferings. Focusing on personal injuries caused by canine attacks, our expertise spans collecting evidence, negotiating settlements, and when necessary, litigating aggressively to secure maximum compensation for our clients’ damages based on Illinois law provisions. Exceptional legal skills accompanied by genuine empathy define us at Carlson Bier; we care about each case as much as our clients do; this spirit drives us forward relentlessly pursuing successful outcomes even amidst obstacles with unwavering commitment towards advocating the rights of those affected by dog bite incidents.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Wood Dale Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of experienced personal injury attorneys, with extensive knowledge and practice in the realm of dog bite injuries. We proudly serve those within Illinois who’ve unfortunately suffered from such traumas. Our aim is to not only assist victims in understanding their rights but also to aid them through legal proceedings so they may obtain rightful compensation.

Dog bites can cause serious harm that goes beyond physical injury; emotional trauma often accompanies these incidents and could potentially cause long-term effects. In fact, across America, millions of people fall victim to dog attacks each year, resulting in an array of injuries ranging from minor cuts or scratches to severe damages like disfigurement and scarring.

It’s crucial for victims to understand that under Illinois law – the ‘Animal Control Act’ – pet owners are held liable if their animal causes injury irrespective of whether previous violent behavior was displayed by the pet or not. Here at Carlson Bier, we ensure our clients comprehend this law thoroughly as it plays a key role in getting you the justice deserved.

As personal injury attorneys, some critical elements we advocate include:

– Reporting The Incident Instantly: It is essential that victims report a dog bite case promptly for appropriate action against the potential hazards posed by the biting dog.

– Medical Attention Is Key: Dog bites entail risks of infections or diseases such as rabies. Therefore immediate medical attention isn’t just beneficial but might be lifesaving.

– Collect Necessary Information: As much as possible gather details about the incident itself along with identifying information concerning

the dog owner

eye witnesses

addressing where it occurred

Compiling evidence will fortify your case exponentially aiding us significantly during legal proceedings on your behalf

Professional representation for dog bite victims involves careful scrutiny into specific circumstances surrounding each case devising strategic approaches towards securing deserving settlements.

Not all cases go trial many are settled outside court However having attorney expertly navigating insurance companies negotiations greatly enhances ability achieve maximum

Our experience of fighting for the rights of victims has led us to secure settlements that cover both physical and emotional damages. We thoroughly understand the laws concerning dog bite claims, ensuring a fair procedure towards claiming rightful compensation.

Being proactive after you’ve been bitten by a dog is important, but finding the right attorney can make all the difference. Not only are our team members experienced in handling such cases, but we also put our clients first and ensure they have access to quality medical treatment while representing them. It’s not just about reparation; at Carlson Bier, it’s about justice and helping survivors rebuild their lives after traumatic incidents.

Clicking on the button below will guide you through a simple process designed to estimate your case value with no obligation – this step could enlighten you towards understanding your legal positioning better when it comes to reclaiming what was lost due to an unfortunate incident that wasn’t your fault. Trust us here at Carlson Bier to be dedicated allies standing up passionately for your cause as we strive toward delivering justice speedily yet diligently because we believe every victim deserves a fresh start!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wood Dale Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Wood Dale

Areas of Practice in Wood Dale

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Scald Damages

Offering specialist legal support for victims of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Hospital Negligence

Extending experienced legal representation for victims affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Accountability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending professional legal assistance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Misconduct

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Stumble Accidents

Expert in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking compensation for their injuries.

Infant Harms

Providing legal guidance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Car Incidents

Collisions: Focused on supporting clients of car accidents secure just recompense for wounds and losses.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal advice for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

18-Wheeler Crash

Delivering adept legal services for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for injuries.

Building Site Accidents

Engaged in defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Expert in offering specialized legal assistance for patients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Expertise in managing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Passing

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and skilled legal guidance to ensure redress.

Neural Harm

Specializing in supporting clients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer