Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Wood River

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries, you need a team of skilled attorneys who can navigate the intricacies of the legal system on your behalf. You’ll find such professionals at Carlson Bier – experts in personal injury lawsuits and well-respected within Illinois’s judicial environment. Fundamentally experienced in handling dog bite injuries cases, they’ve comforted many victims, ensuring justice is rightly served while securing substantial compensation for sustained harm. No case is too complex or minute; their tenacious advocacy combined with profound knowledge lets them maneuver trials and negotiations expertly.

Firmly invested in Illinois communities due to strong local ties, Carlson Bier understands how traumatic a dog bite incident can be for both victims and their families. They believe that everyone deserves superior legal representation following such distressing occurrences irrespective of socio-economic background – promoting fair chance towards comprehensive restitution under law confines.

In summary, if you’re searching for trustworthy representation concerning dog bite injuries within Illinois, consider engaging Caldwell Bier’s suite of dedicated professionals committed to making daunting litigation processes as straightforward as possible while relentlessly pursuing your rightful claim by turning unfortunate circumstances into hope-filled outcomes.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Wood River Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the trauma caused by dog bite injuries and are well-versed in handling such personal injury claims proficiently. Our Illinois-based legal team of dedicated attorneys is equipped to guide you through the complex litigation process, ensuring that your rights are upheld and you receive every dollar you deserve.

Experiencing a dog bite can be an overwhelming event resulting in serious physical injuries and psychological effects. There’s no denying that debilitating scars, nerve damage, infections or emotional distress resultant from these unpleasant encounters contribute significantly to the totality of repercussions victims face. In addition to physical wounds, victims commonly deal with anxiety disorders like Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Understandably so considering traumatic events caused by aggressive dogs have far-reaching impacts on one’s wellbeing!

One pivotal point while exploring grounds for compensation revolves around proving negligence on behalf of the pet owner. The State of Illinois abides by the ‘strict liability’ rule in cases related to animal attacks which remarkably simplifies matters for dog bite victims. In essence, this means that proof of aggressive behavior on part of the accused party’s animal prior to an attack incident or lack thereof becomes irrelevant – if their pet bit someone unprovoked; they’re liable.

• To determine compensation amount factors accounted include: nature & severity of injuries sustained;

• Psychological damages incurred;

• How it has affected quality-of-life holistically;

Apart from quantifiable medical bills and treatment charges associated with a dog bite injury case; long-lasting pain & suffering endured plus lost earnings during recovery period also form considerable components contributory towards computing suitable recompense amounts.

Oftentimes victims contend against powerful insurance company lawyers who exhaust all avenues to minimize their financial obligations. As such it is integral that experienced legal professionals represent you so as not to leave any stone unturned seeking fair settlement sums efficiently sans unnecessary delays.

Over years vested practicing personal injury law primarily within vibrant state borders of Illinois – Carlson Bier has built a commendable reputation for being steadfast advocates championing rightful compensation for victims. A proven track record of winning well-deserved settlements and successful verdicts in multiple dog bite injury cases standing testament to our incessant commitment.

Navigating legal disputes sans seasoned guidance often leads to unfavorable results; self-representation especially in personal injury cases involving dog bites is ill-advised owing to that pronounced risk involved right from initiating claim procedures correctly, gathering incontrovertible evidence supporting your case through trial process management until the very end when you finally obtain just deserts based on court rulings or out-of-court resolutions agreed upon.

Being subjected to traumatic experiences like these require adequate healing time hence it is crucial having strong support structures by side allowing space & opportunity towards effective convalescence undertaking necessary health-focused activities whilst pursuing justice seeking commensurate remunerations purposefully with assistance from proficient allies advocating legally on your behalf!

Feel free to connect with Carlson Bier’s specialized personal injury attorneys who are ready to answer all queries shedding light upon this niche subject matter producing clarity easing journey ahead assuring confidence throughout entire proceeding compressing often tedious litigation progression into smoother transitions enabling amicable issue settlement culmination ultimately.

With years of experience under their belt, our dedicated litigators know how much cogency each specific case holds and perform evaluations exhaustively sifting evidential data thoroughly presenting superior arguments forcing opponents acknowledging full accountability delivering deserved reparations promptly as necessitated rightfully so. Click below now – find out potential worth associated with your unique case reflecting sheer depths of expert understanding concerning intricate personal injury law terrain that Carlson Bier consistently exhibits professionally.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wood River Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Wood River

Areas of Practice in Wood River

Cycling Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or risky conditions.

Thermal Damages

Extending professional legal support for people of severe burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Clinical Incompetence

Delivering specialist legal advice for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Obligation

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, delivering adept legal help to victims affected by harmful products.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip and Tumble Injuries

Expert in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking recovery for their injuries.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal help for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Mishaps

Collisions: Focused on guiding patients of car accidents receive equitable payout for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Collisions

Expert in providing representation for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

18-Wheeler Accident

Offering specialist legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for hurts.

Construction Site Crashes

Dedicated to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Head Harms

Dedicated to providing compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Adept at handling cases for people who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal support to ensure redress.

Spine Impairment

Expert in representing clients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer