...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Woodstock

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries in Woodstock, the depth of experience and specialization matter. At Carlson Bier, we’ve distinguished ourselves in this complex field of law by our attentive approach to cases relating to Dog Bite Injuries. We understand that your paramount need is for justice; hence, we channel our vast legal acumen towards achieving satisfactory outcomes for you. Supported by a legacy built on sheer dedication and prompt action, Carlson Bier prides itself as an emblem of hope after devastating dog attacks. Our leading attorneys have successfully litigated numerous claims involving severe life-altering injuries caused by dogs— consistently outperforming expectations with their advanced knowledge and skillset tailored towards these unique cases. It doesn’t end there; behind every case taken up at Carlson Bier lies accountability—a core tenet that shapes our client-attorney relationship —given credence through consistent communication during each phase until resolution or verdict is reached…and beyond if necessary! With Carlson Bier representing your interests against liable parties you stand a chance to obtain the compensation commensurate with the harm you’ve unjustly endured.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Woodstock Illinois

At the heart of Carlson Bier is a comprehensive commitment to understanding and effectively addressing concerns related to Dog Bite Injuries. As seasoned personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we have cultivated a robust track record over years of providing support to victims who have suffered distress from various dog bite incidents.

Dog bite injuries can be more significant than many people often realize. These could vary from minor abrasions to severe tissue damage, psychological trauma, and diseases sometimes even culminating in fatal outcomes. It’s vital to understand that these ramifications are not just health or medically-related but could also pose logistical issues such as missed workdays and procedural challenges pertinent to compensation claims.

• Legal Rights: As a victim, Illinois law provides you with certain rights after being bitten by a dog. You may be entitled to recover costs for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering.

• Statute of Limitations: It’s crucial you’re aware that Illinois has a strict statute of limitations regarding dog bite lawsuits – traditionaly within two years post-incident; any delay beyond this limit might render your claim non-retrievable.

• Liability: Under the provisions of The Illinois Animal Control Act, if an unprovoked dog or other animal bites someone without provocation while they are on public property (or legally on private property), the owner of the animal is liable for all civil damages.

Our dedicated team at Carlson Bier is unwaveringly committed towards clearing misunderstandings around these issues while ensuring realization of all due legal entitlements for Dog Bite Injury victims. Our extensive experience dealing with cases like yours means we know how crucial immediate action can make disentangling legal procedures easier whilst bettering chances at maximum possible compensation under our state laws.

We believe dealing with Canine-related injuries should never take its toll on your time or resources anymore than it already has — which is why we pride ourselves in providing personalized client-driven strategies intending best possible outcomes for your unique circumstances. Our reputed attorneys are experienced professionals driven by core principles of legality, compassion and superior client service.

At Carlson Bier, we believe in maintaining full transparency throughout the legal process, providing clear explanations of procedures and regular updates on your case’s progress. We’re dedicated to making this experience as straightforward as possible, effectively simplifying jargon-loaded legal processes for easy comprehension.

We encourage you not only to seek immediate medical attention following a dog bite incident but also have timely consultations with an adept personal injury attorney. This ensures vital evidence is correctly preserved while initiating proper documentation necessitating strong validity for your claim within due course of time defined by Illinois law.

As compassionate advocates at the forefront of Personal Injury Law in Illinois, our team works dedicatedly towards getting you full justice deserved after suffering a Dog Bite Injury. Your emotional burden post-incident shouldn’t be compounded by financial strains or hustles through convoluted legal proceedings without adequate support and advice.

Intriguing isn’t it? Want to uncover how much you could potentially reclaim from a dog bite incident? Explore more about this often underestimated yet critical realm around canine-related accidents alongside their repercussions that Carlson Bier has mastered over time! Unleash further key details regarding processing efficient claims; click on the button below right now to determine just how much your case might fetch under our professional guidance.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Woodstock Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Woodstock

Areas of Practice in Woodstock

Bike Collisions

Proficient in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Flame Damages

Extending professional legal support for patients of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Medical Incompetence

Extending dedicated legal services for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Obligation

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal services to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Misconduct

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Trip Mishaps

Professional in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking compensation for their harm.

Infant Injuries

Providing legal help for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Mishaps: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents receive just remuneration for wounds and losses.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Expert in providing legal services for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Truck Collision

Extending specialist legal assistance for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for injuries.

Building Site Incidents

Committed to supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cognitive Impairments

Committed to providing compassionate legal assistance for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Damages

Skilled in addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unfair Passing

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and skilled legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Expert in supporting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​