...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Woodstock

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the trepidation and trauma following spinal cord injuries, expert legal representation can make all the difference. At Carlson Bier, we tackle your challenges head-on. We bring a wealth of knowledge and unfaltering dedication to every case, positioning ourselves as trusted allies for those affected by spinal cord injuries. Committed to safeguarding your rights in Illinois—and especially serving clients in Woodstock—our firm has established a solid reputation for excellence over many years. At Carlson Bier, our experienced team focuses on helping you gain control over an otherwise overwhelming situation—invaluable assistance at this critical time that pays dividends far into the future. Elevating client care above everything else, it is not just our duty—it’s our ethos—to unravel complex matters efficiently and effectively while providing holistic support throughout the journey ahead: one marked by transparent communications and unwavering resolve toward obtaining maximum compensation possible under Illinois law—for each valuable client we’re privileged to serve.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Woodstock Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to representing clients who have sustained spinal cord injuries due to negligence. As personal injury lawyers rooted in Illinois, we understand the severe physical and emotional impact these life-changing incidents can incur.

Spinal cord injuries result from a sudden traumatic blow or direct damage to the nerves within the spinal canal’s bony protection, causing symptoms ranging from weakness and pain management difficulties to severe paralysis. They are typically brought about by events such as motor vehicle crashes, falls, sporting accidents and violent episodes— all scenarios where another party may be legally at fault.

In a legal context, determining liability ties into establishing negligence. It is crucial that any individual suffering from a spinal cord injury contact an experienced attorney as soon as possible. This allows for immediate initiation of necessary investigations and witness interviews so essential evidence does not disappear over time—a priority that our team at Carlson Bier ensures will receive prompt attention.

Once a lawsuit is filed with us taking on your case, you could be entitled to various forms of compensation:

• Current and future medical expenses directly related to your injury

• Lost wages due to being unable to work

• Pain and suffering endured as a result of the incident

• Loss of enjoyment in activities previously partaken in

Furthermore, it’s integral that our prospective clients understand Illinois’ comparative fault rule which essentially means – if an individual is partially responsible for his or her own accident, this will affect how much they can recover from other at-fault parties.

Lastly, it cannot be overstated how important early legal intervention is for viable cases – dates called “statutes of limitations” place boundaries on when one can file suit regarding certain matters. In Illinois specifically for personal injury issues? The statute of limitations is two years with some exceptions applied – reinforcing why contacting us immediately following an incident resulting in spinal cord damage should never be delayed.

We believe profoundly in advocating passionately for those affected by irreversible harm not brought about by their own actions. At Carlson Bier, with deep roots in Illinois and a firm commitment to help those experiencing the turmoil spinal cord injuries inflict, bringing justice for these unfortunate incidents is of utmost importance.

Never underestimate your right to fair compensation when facing life-altering challenges that such injuries can cause. The financial implications paired with possible societal reintegration barriers are not burdens that should be borne alone – especially when caused by the carelessness or disregard of another individual or entity.

If you have experienced a spinal cord injury and feel someone else may be legally at fault, our dedicated team at Carlson Bier is ready to assist. Calculating what your case is worth involves numerous complexities which only seasoned professionals can accurately navigate through—we never take a cookie-cutter approach but thoroughly examine each client’s unique situation.

In this difficult time, taking legal action may seem daunting—it doesn’t have to be. Allow us to guide you through the process while learning more about Illinois’ legal system concerning personal injury law involving spinal cord damage. Understandably, questions will arise regarding your hardships— we’re here to answer them every step along this journey towards garnering restitution.

We invite you now to take the subsequent proactive step – click on the button below for an evaluation of what your case could potentially yield monetarily—the journey towards regaining control starts here.Standard Terms & Conditions apply.Your claim value cannot be fully guaranteed as court outcomes and laws change.Bear in mind also that past performance does not predict future results.And it must always be remembered each case is unique just as everyone’s personal circumstances are unique.And no two cases’ monetary values will exactly match even under mostly similar conditions.Any potential award amount stated represent gross amounts from which attorney fees would need typically need still to be deducted.Lastly,Cases referred within our network could increase costs due.We encourage understanding all these variables before proceeding.but nonetheless we stand ready if you chose-let’s move forward together for justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Woodstock Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Woodstock

Areas of Practice in Woodstock

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Fire Burns

Supplying adept legal assistance for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Hospital Misconduct

Ensuring specialist legal representation for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Handling cases involving defective products, providing skilled legal guidance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Tumble Mishaps

Professional in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal guidance for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Accidents: Committed to guiding sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate settlement for damages and impairment.

Motorbike Mishaps

Committed to providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

18-Wheeler Crash

Ensuring specialist legal representation for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for harms.

Construction Incidents

Dedicated to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Injuries

Dedicated to providing professional legal support for clients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Wounds

Skilled in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Wrongful Passing

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and professional legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Backbone Damage

Focused on defending patients with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​