Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Worden

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re a resident of Worden facing the unfortunate aftermath of a dog bite injury, Carlson Bier is your go-to law firm for exceptional legal representation. Our experienced attorneys specialize in personal injury cases, with a notable emphasis on dog bite injuries. With its deep understanding of Illinois legislation related to animal attacks and dog owner liabilities, Carlson Bier effectively safeguards your rights while pushing for an equitable settlement or judgment. We are known not only for our extensive experience but also for comprehensive one-on-one consultation sessions that allow us to build compelling cases backed by thorough investigation and strategic planning. Dedicated to securing justice and fair compensation, we champion every victim’s cause relentlessly until their rightful claim has been met. With Carlson Bier’s skilled legal team standing beside you through this distressing ordeal, rest assured that they will leave no stone unturned in their quest to ensure the best possible outcome – because when it comes to protecting victims of dog bite incidents in Worden, nothing less than excellent will do at Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Worden Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we empathize with the traumatic experience of sustaining injuries from dog bites and understand the potential physical, emotional, and financial toll it can take on individuals. As premiere personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our comprehensive practice is designed to help you navigate these challenging circumstances while striving to secure a settlement that addresses your unique needs.

Dog bite injuries constitute a significant portion of personal injury categories in Illinois courts, as they often result in severe damages requiring medical attention—damages that should be borne not by you but the perpetrator’s party responsible for this unfortunate incident. It’s crucial to be aware of specific key factors surrounding this legislated matter:

– A strict liability state: The state of Illinois stands firm under “strict liability” theory in cases relating to dog bites. In simple terms, owners are held accountable for their pets’ aggressive behavior towards any individual without provocation.

– Bite isn’t mandatory: Importantly, “dog bite” law also covers situations where an individual might be knocked down or otherwise injured by a dog—injury needn’t necessitate an actual bite.

– Provocation plays a role: If it is proved that the victim incited or provoked the animal leading to an attack—the owner might not bear full responsibility.

On most occasions, dog bite victims are faced with mounting treatment costs coupled with psychological distress. Consequently, compensation secured from such claims may include economic aspects like hospital expenditures or future therapy along with non-economic referrals regarding pain and suffering endured so far.

Partnering with an experienced legal ally like Carlson Bier equips you with tactical strategies deployed at appropriate junctures while fighting against adversarial insurance corporations attempting to belittle your plight. Our knowledgeable attorney’s team scrutinizes every minute detail—from collecting substantive evidence ensuring fault liability assumes focus—to estimating accurate claim value since obtaining fair compensatory relief forms our objective heartline.

Alongside specifics encircling dog bite matters propounded above we work concertedly on other aspects including, but not limited to:

– Counseling you through every case timeline and provision intricacy.

– Representing your interests in mediation meetings or court trials if essential.

– Guiding time-critical decisions—like timely filing before the two-year statute of limitations deadline expires.

We pride ourselves on our client-centric approach – handling every case dignifiedly, providing rightful owner education, fostering communication transparency while demystifying complexities. Our reputation as steadfast personal injury advocates perpetuates our drive at Carlson Bier to seek optimal outcomes for you.

Sustaining a dog bite injury is unquestionably life-altering—catapulting financial strain, instigating emotional distress with potent debilitating effects. However, crucial it remains to remember that dedicated legal recourse exists at your disposal—the sole intent to alleviate sufferings imbued by someone else’s accountability lapse. You shouldn’t have to endure this ordeal alone—and that’s where we ply our trade. Solidifying reassurances around seeking just compensation commences your healing path anew—a testament we stand by invariably at Carlson Bier.

So how do you embark upon tapping into the respite advocated under Illinois law concerning dog bites? While uncertainties indeed persist considering navigating such complex legal terrains from a standpoint both unfamiliar and overwhelming—an initial consultation at Carlson Bier lays down clarity foundations beginning your journey towards substantial recovery right away.

We cordially invite you—you who’ve unfairly borne brunts of someone else’s oversight—to leverage our expansive Illinois based personal injury experience outlining successful measures against such testing times maneuvered countless clients aboard pacific settlements shores previously unthinkable. Feel free to click on the button below voiced by an indomitable spirit hoping justice doesn’t remain evasive anymore—for when quantifying true damages worth counterbalances undue hardship inflicted unknowingly—it’s then that authentic acknowledgment reigns supreme within premises practised since ages: Justice for all!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Worden Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Worden

Areas of Practice in Worden

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Focused on legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Supplying specialist legal services for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Negligence

Providing specialist legal representation for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Fault

Managing cases involving faulty products, extending adept legal help to clients affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Misconduct

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Fall Injuries

Expert in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking compensation for their damages.

Neonatal Wounds

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Incidents: Concentrated on supporting sufferers of car accidents get just remuneration for hurts and harm.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Truck Collision

Offering expert legal advice for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for damages.

Construction Site Incidents

Dedicated to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Head Harms

Specializing in delivering professional legal support for victims suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Expertise in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Undeserved Death

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and adept legal representation to ensure justice.

Neural Damage

Focused on supporting clients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer