FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Yorkville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be traumatic and life-altering. Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury lawyer group, specializes in derailing the complexities surrounding dog bite injuries so victims may focus on their recovery. In Illinois, including Yorkville, specific laws promote rights of victims bitten by negligent canine owners. Navigating these legal intricacies requires expert counsel like that embodied by Carlson Bier’s team of dedicated attorneys who understand the unique challenges facing injured parties in such cases. Known for its robust commitment to justice and fair recompense, our firm has accrued extensive experience handling diverse cases sensitively and meticulously–establishing us as uniquely adept at representing clients with dog bite injuries claims within Illinois jurisdictional confines effectively. Choosing us means you’re not just hiring any attorney; you’re aligning yourself with established professionals committed to securing your future wellbeing following this sudden onset adversity—a partner fervent about leveling the scales of justice when engaging unscrupulous pet owners’ negligence or indifference.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Yorkville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our team of highly-skilled Illinois-based personal injury attorneys understands the physical and emotional trauma that can arise from a dog bite incident. Possessing decades of combined experience handling cases related to animal-related injuries specifically in Illinois, we are committed to providing legal expertise you can count on in your time of need.

Dog bites account for more than one-third of all homeowners’ insurance liability claims paid out annually, with over 4.5 million people bitten by dogs each year according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Each state has its unique laws regarding dog bite incidents, and understanding Illinois law could be paramount for a positive outcome when filing a claim or lawsuit.

In Illinois, two statutes focus on dog owners’ specific liabilities when their pet attacks or injures another person: The Animal Control Act and Local County/City Dog Ordinances. These ordinances often contain stricter rules about responsible pet ownership along with further civil penalties if an attack occurs.

• Under the Illinois Animal Control Act, strict liability applies.

• Owners may be held accountable whether they were aware of their dog’s propensity for aggression or not.

• Even if the owner took measures to restrain the dog or warn others about the danger, they could still be liable.

• However parks, licensed hunters during hunting season & police/military dogs are typically exceptions.

Additionally, some local county/city ordinances have less leniency towards negligent pet owners. They call for tougher consequences even before an incident happens like requiring ‘vicious’ dogs being kept indoors or inside a locked kennel when outdoors.

Beyond this aspect of legal complexity that requires rigorous understanding and navigation is the daunting phase associated with effects of such bites which range from simple lacerations requiring minimal stitches to severe disfigurations leading extensive surgeries and rehabilitation processes potentially causing significant financial burdens. Also common but generally underestimated is psychological distress after such traumatic experiences including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), fear of animals, and depression.

Having a compassionate legal expert on your side can make the difference between just medical coverage or comprehensive restitution covering:

• All related past, current, and future medical expenses

• Lost wages due to time off work

• Pain and suffering

• Emotional distress

No one should be forced to bear these burdens alone, nor navigate through perplexing legal terrain whilst grappling with personal trauma. Our commitment at Carlson Bier is to handle your case with utmost diligence in asserting your rights so you receive full compensation warranted by Illinois law for losses sustained in such an unfortunate incident. We ensure that our clients understand their rights; offering clear explanations as we take you through existing laws applicable to your unique situation in an understandable manner.

We believe that informed representation coupled with aggressive action will help deliver success in securing justice for dog bite victims. Allow us to shine light on adduced claims where glaring incidents involving seemingly mundane activities such as everyday walks or neighborly visits turned hurtful due to unsecured pets. By providing insightful perspectives from real-life incidents, we aim not only deliver needed service but also raise safety awareness within communities towards preventing similar occurrences.

Contact us today – let’s lend our strength of experience and expertise behind pursuit of rightful claim enabling confident strides towards healing & recovery without undue stress over financial implications or confusions about the way forward legally speaking. Simply click on the button below now – find out what your case could potentially be worth right from experts committed entirely towards delivering justice efficiently while keeping you wholly caught up with every development concerning crucial journey returning back to normalcy after traumatic experiences caused by no fault of yours.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Yorkville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Yorkville

Areas of Practice in Yorkville

Cycling Incidents

Expert in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Providing specialist legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal representation for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, extending adept legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Abuse

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Stumble Accidents

Specialist in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking restitution for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Extending legal support for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Accidents

Mishaps: Focused on assisting clients of car accidents obtain just remuneration for harms and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Truck Mishap

Offering experienced legal services for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for harms.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Head Traumas

Committed to ensuring expert legal services for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at handling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unfair Demise

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and adept legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Focused on supporting patients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440